Hi Edsel,
normaly I am thinking ...
At summer time I can try to be uptodate in testing engines. Programmers are in Holiday ...
No chance for a break in my list ...
I tested one engine and if I am ready two new versions are available.
A hard time for engine testers.
On the other hand ...
I have it ... the new Hannibal version after a long time a new version. In this case it's absolutely OK ... shit summer ... engines should be test ... much more important.
Best
Frank
Hannibal 1.7
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 am
- Full name: Edsel Apostol
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Thanks Guenther. That link was not updated for a long time.Guenther wrote:Hi Edsel,
There are some old and/or outdated links at the chess engine portal.
I have marked those with '=> (comment)', just in case you want to
update the link section
Guenther
I'll try to update it over the weekend taking note of your feedback as well as add new links.
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 am
- Full name: Edsel Apostol
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Hi Ingo, we have fixed the issue with ponder games on the Shredder UI. We'll be looking forward to see it in your list.IWB wrote:Hello Edsel,
I started a test already. If it gets into the TOP 16 it will throw out the old horse Naum
I remember Hanibal 1.5 having some ponder issues which causes a lot of time losses. The first 20 games of 1.7 are fine ... I am crossing fingers!
Thanks for the version
Ingo
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 am
- Full name: Edsel Apostol
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Thanks Frank! Looking forward to see it in the top 10 of your list. I'll add a link to your page to my Chess Engine Portal when I update it.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi Edsel,
normaly I am thinking ...
At summer time I can try to be uptodate in testing engines. Programmers are in Holiday ...
No chance for a break in my list ...
I tested one engine and if I am ready two new versions are available.
A hard time for engine testers.
On the other hand ...
I have it ... the new Hannibal version after a long time a new version. In this case it's absolutely OK ... shit summer ... engines should be test ... much more important.
Best
Frank
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Very nice - an excellent sparring partner for the latest crafty at time control 15 sec / .25 sec incrementEdsel Apostol wrote:Hannibal 1.7 is now available at
https://sites.google.com/site/edapostol/hannibal
It should be much stronger than 1.5.
Please see the readme file for the list of changes.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Rating Δ + - # Σ Σ% W L D W% =%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Crafty-25.1-080416 3110 0.0 76 76 40 21.5 53.8 13 10 17 32.5 42.5
2 Hannibal-1.7 3090 21.0 76 76 40 18.5 46.2 10 13 17 25.0 42.5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 am
- Full name: Edsel Apostol
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Latest Crafty seems strong. How much Elo was that compared to the last public release?MikeB wrote:Very nice - an excellent sparring partner for the latest crafty at time control 15 sec / .25 sec incrementEdsel Apostol wrote:Hannibal 1.7 is now available at
https://sites.google.com/site/edapostol/hannibal
It should be much stronger than 1.5.
Please see the readme file for the list of changes.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cejjt6qmuzxni ... l.pgn?dl=1Code: Select all
Rank Name Rating Δ + - # Σ Σ% W L D W% =% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Crafty-25.1-080416 3110 0.0 76 76 40 21.5 53.8 13 10 17 32.5 42.5 2 Hannibal-1.7 3090 21.0 76 76 40 18.5 46.2 10 13 17 25.0 42.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 7:54 am
- Location: Southwest USA
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Edsel Apostol wrote:MikeB wrote:Engine error Hannibal 1.7w32.....(not valid w32 engine)Edsel Apostol wrote:Hannibal 1.7 is now available at
https://sites.google.com/site/edapostol/hannibal
It should be much stronger than 1.5.
Please see the readme file for the list of changes.
Thx for the attempt...AR
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Just to clarify - this was a Windows 32 bit Hannibal running against a native 64 bit version of crafty - so the results above are not really a good indicator. With that said , I believe current crafty may be 40-50 ELO better - but what I see never really translate to what CCRL will show - one reason is different OS -, two my crafty compiles are uniquely tuned for my machine - a Mac Pro with 12 cores and three, not 100% convinced that the CCRL testers are focused on are making sure all the settings are optimal. Settings can vary from machine to machine - but probably all authors feel the same way - so in the end I think CCRL is fair and my results are probably a little biased towards crafty. So real world - I would hope for a 25 point ELO gain on CCRL.Edsel Apostol wrote:Latest Crafty seems strong. How much Elo was that compared to the last public release?MikeB wrote:Very nice - an excellent sparring partner for the latest crafty at time control 15 sec / .25 sec incrementEdsel Apostol wrote:Hannibal 1.7 is now available at
https://sites.google.com/site/edapostol/hannibal
It should be much stronger than 1.5.
Please see the readme file for the list of changes.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cejjt6qmuzxni ... l.pgn?dl=1Code: Select all
Rank Name Rating Δ + - # Σ Σ% W L D W% =% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Crafty-25.1-080416 3110 0.0 76 76 40 21.5 53.8 13 10 17 32.5 42.5 2 Hannibal-1.7 3090 21.0 76 76 40 18.5 46.2 10 13 17 25.0 42.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Hello Edsel,Edsel Apostol wrote:Hi Ingo, we have fixed the issue with ponder games on the Shredder UI. We'll be looking forward to see it in your list.IWB wrote:Hello Edsel,
I started a test already. If it gets into the TOP 16 it will throw out the old horse Naum
I remember Hanibal 1.5 having some ponder issues which causes a lot of time losses. The first 20 games of 1.7 are fine ... I am crossing fingers!
Thanks for the version
Ingo
It is not completly gone. In 2014 games I have 7 losses on time. That is nothing to worry about but it is still there.
Do you allways keep some time on the clock left or do you play in the last fraction of the last second?
Besides that, the performance until now is briliant!
Ingo
-
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Hannibal 1.7
According to your site you play with +3s increment, is that right?IWB wrote: It is not completly gone. In 2014 games I have 7 losses on time. That is nothing to worry about but it is still there.
Do you allways keep some time on the clock left or do you play in the last fraction of the last second?
Besides that, the performance until now is briliant! :-)
Ingo
Then it shouldn't really lose on time.
Is there any pattern to those 7 time losses, e.g. resolving fail lows
in already bad positions, or very drawish endgames near the 50 moves draw?
Guenther