Page 5 of 5

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:50 pm
by BubbaTough
MikeGL wrote:
Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
Windows XP 32 bit.

:oops: pgado daan :oops:

I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows. :lol:
I have to do a new compile for xp. I can do it tomorrow.

Sam

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:00 pm
by Edsel Apostol
MikeGL wrote:
Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
Windows XP 32 bit.

:oops: pgado daan :oops:

I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows. :lol:
Ilonggo ka man? :)

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:09 pm
by MikeGL
BubbaTough wrote:
MikeGL wrote:
Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
Windows XP 32 bit.

:oops: pgado daan :oops:

I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows. :lol:
I have to do a new compile for xp. I can do it tomorrow.

Sam
Thanks Sam and Edsel. Excited to try out your engine.
Kind regards


p.s.
oo ed, karay-a takun ; )
check your private msg inbox

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:29 pm
by IWB
Just to finish that topic:

3520 games with 10 losses on time. With a performance of 44% that would be about 4 point more in total (in average). That is about 0.3% performance loss ... nothing I would worry about!

Ingo

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:26 pm
by rainhaus
You have my respect for keeping your promise so right on time :!: http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ghlight=me
Simply because of historical reasons Hannibal is to be expected that the pyrenees must not be an obstacle. In this case the engine will push Andscas (from Andorra, Pyrenees) from the 10th place and Naum does not longer belong to the top 16 of the Ipon list.
Subject to the requirement that Hannibal is the Carthaginian commander who crossed the alps and not the cannibalic serial killer!

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 11:04 pm
by cdani
:-)

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 6:46 am
by Edsel Apostol
IWB wrote:Just to finish that topic:

3520 games with 10 losses on time. With a performance of 44% that would be about 4 point more in total (in average). That is about 0.3% performance loss ... nothing I would worry about!

Ingo
Thanks Ingo! Nice to see it in the top 10. Hopefully Daniel don't release new Andscacs soon, else will be out of the top 10. :)

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 1:17 pm
by BubbaTough
I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.

-Sam

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:28 pm
by MikeGL
BubbaTough wrote:I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.

-Sam
Hi Sam,

I am willing to beta test your new Hannibal 1.7 engine. Not sure what are the pre-requisites to qualify though.

But I have a bunch of test suites and games which I could use to check. Most of my test suites are taken from public domain although I have some of my own too, which was slightly tweaked positions from my actual games. I have also just replied to your private msg.

Thanks in advance

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:40 pm
by Rebel
cdani wrote:Just to comment it, I leave unused upto 3 x increment time, so should be impossible that Andscacs loses on time. If it happens is something of the operating system.
Or a busy PC doing other things.