benchmark new smartphones:

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Dann Corbit, hgm

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Milton
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:58 pm

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by Milton » Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:23 pm

Lion wrote:
Sun Sep 29, 2019 9:33 am
Do we have some data for the newly released iPhone Pro 11 ?

Rgds
I actually did 2 benchmarks on my iPhone 11 Pro Max. I did not post them because my understanding is that for them to be official you have to post a screen shot. The url I used for that purpose closed and I did not feel like opening a new account somewhere else. But, FWIW, I got these results:

1.at 2:01 I got 6290.7 kN/s
2. at 2:00, I got 6275.8 kN/s

Lion
Posts: 521
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by Lion » Wed Oct 02, 2019 2:45 pm

Thank you very much for sharing your results.

If compared to an iPhone Xs measured at 5'119 kn/s this is over 20% improvement. Not bad at all!

rgds

User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2698
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by Nordlandia » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:55 am

Milton wrote:
Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:23 pm
Lion wrote:
Sun Sep 29, 2019 9:33 am
Do we have some data for the newly released iPhone Pro 11 ?

Rgds
I actually did 2 benchmarks on my iPhone 11 Pro Max. I did not post them because my understanding is that for them to be official you have to post a screen shot. The url I used for that purpose closed and I did not feel like opening a new account somewhere else. But, FWIW, I got these results:

1.at 2:01 I got 6290.7 kN/s
2. at 2:00, I got 6275.8 kN/s
Can you try this FEN



It was the Sedat benchmark position for stockfish. https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... benchrules

User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18353
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by mclane » Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:41 am

Before we benchmark them for chess we see how they benchmark in antutu

https://youtu.be/4MMsZdRQIp0
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....

User avatar
MikeB
Posts: 4505
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:34 am
Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by MikeB » Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:45 am

Nordlandia wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:55 am
Milton wrote:
Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:23 pm
Lion wrote:
Sun Sep 29, 2019 9:33 am
Do we have some data for the newly released iPhone Pro 11 ?

Rgds
I actually did 2 benchmarks on my iPhone 11 Pro Max. I did not post them because my understanding is that for them to be official you have to post a screen shot. The url I used for that purpose closed and I did not feel like opening a new account somewhere else. But, FWIW, I got these results:

1.at 2:01 I got 6290.7 kN/s
2. at 2:00, I got 6275.8 kN/s
Can you try this FEN



It was the Sedat benchmark position for stockfish. https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... benchrules
one second. never changes
Image

User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18353
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by mclane » Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:41 pm

2 phones:

Realme X2 pro, 12 GB / 256 GB
A new company. They want to storm the flagship market and beat ONE PLUS or Xiaomi.

The cpu is sd855+.
Ram is very fast. Nevertheless not only cpu and RAM is important but also cooling because of throttle experience coming close to the 2 minute time control we benchmark.

Therefore disapointing 4.619.000


Same cpu but now gaming mobile:
Asus Rog Phone 2, tencent version 8/128 GB.

5.618.000 NPS.

Could be the better cooling is the reason for this,

Both have fast display. Realme has 90 hz, Asus even 120 hz.
They also have ufs3.0 memory.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....

User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18353
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by mclane » Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:20 am

Huawei mate 30.
Android 10
Google apps.
Kirin 990
5232 k

So the Kirin scores as good as a snapdragon 855+

Mostly the cooling of the devices decides about the range of results. The cheap realme x2 pro has a lousy cooling, Asus ROG phone 2 has a marvelous cooling.
In between the result of the Kirin 990 CPU.

In antutu it gets 430.000

Despite all efforts of President Trump to stop Huawei, the mate 30 series is life and kicking.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....

Jhoravi
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 4:49 am

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by Jhoravi » Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:37 pm

Thats amazing for a smartphone. My laptop 8th gen core i7-8550u can can only manage 4200k at best & much slower most of the time. Something must be wrong.

User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18353
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by mclane » Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:35 pm

It means 5232 = 5.232.000 Nps on 8 cores mobile phone.

If your intel Cpu has less, you maybe do the bench only on 1 core.

If you use all 4 cores it should be more.
Another thing, has the U machine 4 cores or only 2 ? E.g. my i7 7500U has only 2 cores and Hyperthread.
Last edited by mclane on Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....

User avatar
Laskos
Posts: 10946
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:21 pm
Full name: Kai Laskos

Re: benchmark new smartphones:

Post by Laskos » Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:36 pm

Jhoravi wrote:
Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:37 pm
Thats amazing for a smartphone. My laptop 8th gen core i7-8550u can can only manage 4200k at best & much slower most of the time. Something must be wrong.
Probably not wrong. On my fast i7 4th generation 4.0 GHz, 4 cores, I am getting about 6500k. On my cheapo Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, I am getting 3300k after 2 minutes. It's odd, but not wrong. When they will have tensor cores on GPU, and someone writes the backend for Lc0, it will be impressive in every aspect. I don't know, it seems the phone chips are the most impressive things there in in these fields. Probably the volume of sales lowers prices too, and the research on them is more active.

Post Reply