http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v5 ... 4413a.html
https://www.amazon.ca/Deep-Thinking-Mac ... p+Thinking
Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Cre
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:58 pm
- Location: Canada
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:59 pm
- Location: Winder, GA
- Full name: Robert C. Maddox
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
"In Deep Thinking, Kasparov offers an engaging insight into his psychological state during the match. To a degree, he walks back on his earlier claims, concluding that although IBM probably did not cheat, it violated the spirit of fair competition by obscuring useful information."
In other words, the Deep Blue team unfairly followed the rules?
In other words, the Deep Blue team unfairly followed the rules?
-
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:34 pm
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
Modern desktop computers are probably not fast enough and have not enough memory to truly surpass human world champion chess capability.
My computer for example only uses 6 physical cores and only 8 Gigs of RAM. I believe that's not enough to truly surpass the world champion.
However I believe that in the future computers will be fast enough and have enough memory to truly surpass world champion.
My computer for example only uses 6 physical cores and only 8 Gigs of RAM. I believe that's not enough to truly surpass the world champion.
However I believe that in the future computers will be fast enough and have enough memory to truly surpass world champion.
-
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:58 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
Wrong!Uri wrote:Modern desktop computers are probably not fast enough and have not enough memory to truly surpass human world champion chess capability.
My computer for example only uses 6 physical cores and only 8 Gigs of RAM. I believe that's not enough to truly surpass the world champion.
However I believe that in the future computers will be fast enough and have enough memory to truly surpass world champion.
-
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:34 pm
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
Why is it wrong? Because you say so?Sean Evans wrote:Wrong!
There are many instances of Kasparov making better moves than the computer.
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:28 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
I agree with Sean's statement.Sean Evans wrote:Wrong!Uri wrote:Modern desktop computers are probably not fast enough and have not enough memory to truly surpass human world champion chess capability.
My computer for example only uses 6 physical cores and only 8 Gigs of RAM. I believe that's not enough to truly surpass the world champion.
However I believe that in the future computers will be fast enough and have enough memory to truly surpass world champion.
"Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken." (Dune - 1984)
Lonnie
Lonnie
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
Lol, congratz man, you are really the king of trolls.Uri wrote:Modern desktop computers are probably not fast enough and have not enough memory to truly surpass human world champion chess capability.
My computer for example only uses 6 physical cores and only 8 Gigs of RAM. I believe that's not enough to truly surpass the world champion.
However I believe that in the future computers will be fast enough and have enough memory to truly surpass world champion.
My cellphone running DroidFish would have at least 60% against Carlsen on FIDE time control. In blitz that would easily go to 80%.
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
3 years old cheap cellphone.Milos wrote:Lol, congratz man, you are really the king of trolls.Uri wrote:Modern desktop computers are probably not fast enough and have not enough memory to truly surpass human world champion chess capability.
My computer for example only uses 6 physical cores and only 8 Gigs of RAM. I believe that's not enough to truly surpass the world champion.
However I believe that in the future computers will be fast enough and have enough memory to truly surpass world champion.
My cellphone running DroidFish would have at least 60% against Carlsen on FIDE time control. In blitz that would easily go to 80%.
-
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:34 pm
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
And you are the king of idiots.Milos wrote:Lol, congratz man, you are really the king of trolls.
Seriously, why are you guys so hostile?
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:39 pm
Re: Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human
It's a mere fact. Take whatever computer chess rating list (e.g. CEGT, CCRL, IPON), then read.
True, the Elo from each list is not calibrated on a reference human basepoint.
But I think, every specialist would agree that on the computer you mentioned in your fist post, the current top 3 programs
(Stockfish, Komodo, Houdini) should have at least a 3200+ Elo (and I'm VERY conservative), would their Elo be managed by FIDE
across regular participation of those programs competing on your hardware in human OTB tournaments.
True, the Elo from each list is not calibrated on a reference human basepoint.
But I think, every specialist would agree that on the computer you mentioned in your fist post, the current top 3 programs
(Stockfish, Komodo, Houdini) should have at least a 3200+ Elo (and I'm VERY conservative), would their Elo be managed by FIDE
across regular participation of those programs competing on your hardware in human OTB tournaments.
Per ardua ad astra