For quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Milos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
To spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Milos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
After MGP 2400 Elo crushed Stockfish into little meatballs....I thought it would be fun to give SF @ 1 ply a chance. This is Fun!
Code: Select all
Result:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# name games wins draws losses score los% elo+/-
1. Sargon 1978 V1.00 35 23 3 9 24.5 99.3 147.2
2. Stockfish 141020 35 9 3 23 10.5 0.7 -147.2
Cross table:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# name score games 1 2
1. Sargon 1978 V1.00 24.5 35 x 101111=1111101101011=10100=11010111
2. Stockfish 141020 10.5 35 010000=0000010010100=01011=00101000 x
Tech:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tech (average nodes, depths, time/m per move, others per game), counted for computing moves only, ignored moves with zero nodes:
# name nodes/m NPS depth/m time/m moves time
1. Sargon 1978 V1.00 225K 30876 5.7 7.3 36.0 262.4
2. Stockfish 141020 8K 719472 1.0 0.0 36.2 0.4
all --- 113K 31882 3.3 3.6 36.1 131.4
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Again to spell for retard who is obviously clueless, Elo is a relative measure that without a common base is a meaningless number. 1978 dedicated chess computer is at least 500 Elo weaker than SF-NNUE depth 1 totally irrespective of how SF absolute rating is calculated vs. humans or today's engines or 1970/80s chess computers. You again demonstrate that you are seriously challenged in basic comprehension.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:56 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
The fun thing is that an ape in a zoo has better understanding of human language than you do.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:56 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
After MGP 2400 Elo crushed Stockfish into little meatballs....I thought it would be fun to give SF @ 1 ply a chance. This is Fun!
Code: Select all
Result: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # name games wins draws losses score los% elo+/- 1. Sargon 1978 V1.00 35 23 3 9 24.5 99.3 147.2 2. Stockfish 141020 35 9 3 23 10.5 0.7 -147.2 Cross table: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # name score games 1 2 1. Sargon 1978 V1.00 24.5 35 x 101111=1111101101011=10100=11010111 2. Stockfish 141020 10.5 35 010000=0000010010100=01011=00101000 x Tech: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tech (average nodes, depths, time/m per move, others per game), counted for computing moves only, ignored moves with zero nodes: # name nodes/m NPS depth/m time/m moves time 1. Sargon 1978 V1.00 225K 30876 5.7 7.3 36.0 262.4 2. Stockfish 141020 8K 719472 1.0 0.0 36.2 0.4 all --- 113K 31882 3.3 3.6 36.1 131.4
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
That is why we run test. Who is better. And Stockfish at 1 ply is clearly rated much much worse then MGP from 1993, and much worse then Sargon from 1978.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:01 amAgain to spell for retard who is obviously clueless, Elo is a relative measure that without a common base is a meaningless number. 1978 dedicated chess computer is at least 500 Elo weaker than SF-NNUE depth 1 totally irrespective of how SF absolute rating is calculated vs. humans or today's engines or 1970/80s chess computers. You again demonstrate that you are seriously challenged in basic comprehension.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:56 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
You know that talking about oneself in plural is quite worrying indication of schizophrenia?mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:08 amThat is why we run test. Who is better. And Stockfish at 1 ply is clearly rated much much worse then MPG from 1993, and much worse then Sargon from 1978.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:01 amAgain to spell for retard who is obviously clueless, Elo is a relative measure that without a common base is a meaningless number. 1978 dedicated chess computer is at least 500 Elo weaker than SF-NNUE depth 1 totally irrespective of how SF absolute rating is calculated vs. humans or today's engines or 1970/80s chess computers. You again demonstrate that you are seriously challenged in basic comprehension.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:56 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
I was talking about testers, and we see again. You do not test, but just spill B.S. as facts. I know clearly that you do not test.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:13 amYou know that talking about oneself in plural is quite worrying indication of schizophrenia?mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:08 amThat is why we run test. Who is better. And Stockfish at 1 ply is clearly rated much much worse then MPG from 1993, and much worse then Sargon from 1978.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:01 amAgain to spell for retard who is obviously clueless, Elo is a relative measure that without a common base is a meaningless number. 1978 dedicated chess computer is at least 500 Elo weaker than SF-NNUE depth 1 totally irrespective of how SF absolute rating is calculated vs. humans or today's engines or 1970/80s chess computers. You again demonstrate that you are seriously challenged in basic comprehension.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:56 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am
Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
The only thing that is BS are your tests. Apart from being totally useless they are often fixed. You rename an engine with a fake name, or let it play on 1 core only while giving opponent all the cores, etc.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:18 amI was talking about testers, and we see again. You do not test, but just spill B.S. as facts. I know clearly that you do not test.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:13 amYou know that talking about oneself in plural is quite worrying indication of schizophrenia?mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:08 amThat is why we run test. Who is better. And Stockfish at 1 ply is clearly rated much much worse then MPG from 1993, and much worse then Sargon from 1978.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:01 amAgain to spell for retard who is obviously clueless, Elo is a relative measure that without a common base is a meaningless number. 1978 dedicated chess computer is at least 500 Elo weaker than SF-NNUE depth 1 totally irrespective of how SF absolute rating is calculated vs. humans or today's engines or 1970/80s chess computers. You again demonstrate that you are seriously challenged in basic comprehension.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:56 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. This is your claim! And is tested easily.....Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:54 amTo spell for retard, dedicated chess computer is an engine playing on 6502, that's 1975 10um CPU, not playing on 2018 Zen+ 12nm CPU.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:49 amMilos---"SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That is at least 500 Elo above the best dedicated chess." computers.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:40 amFor quality trolling one needs some intelligence. You lack even the basic comprehension. Discussion that you hijacked was about running on 6502. You obviously don't even know what's that.mwyoung wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 amI know, and did you see the fake Mephisto Gideon professional by Ed Schröder crush Stockfish even worse....Ask Ed if MGP is also fake.Milos wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:14 amYou are missing that a retard is playing an engine called Sargon on 2950x CPU and has 50kN/s. As usual all his tests are outright fake.lkaufman wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:42 pmSargon from 1978?? My recollection was that in 1978 the best chess computer one could buy ( excluding million dollar computers or the like) was no better than 1500 (probably much worse), and that was with 2 hours; at 5+5 should be like 1000 or worse. SF one ply shouldn't be that bad! What am I missing here? Chess computers one could buy weren't half-decent until early 1980s, unless my memory is quite wrong.mwyoung wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:55 pmYou could not even engine test your way out of a paper bag. And your engine testing are as spot on as your conclusions.
As usual!
Sargon from 1978 vs Stockfish NNUE @ 1 ply (TC=5m+5s)
Live feed:
You can download the "fake" Sargon for UCI here. https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2020/ ... n-100.html
Your conclusions, and memory, and your facts.