BeyondCritics wrote: This is kings indian...
Nevertheless i insist: Black should understand that he is fighting with the back against the wall. Very energetic action is required. So maybe with 10..h5 and 16..f5 and 19...b5 black can create enough of a mayhem.
All good!
Completely agree...every KID player who handles it in a passive way loses most of their games by getting positionally crushed - only energetic play by black can attempt to undermine white's space advantage.
We could generalize and say that if black hasn't managed ...b5 or ...f5 by move 15, it's time to resign.
BeyondCritics wrote: This is kings indian...
Nevertheless i insist: Black should understand that he is fighting with the back against the wall. Very energetic action is required. So maybe with 10..h5 and 16..f5 and 19...b5 black can create enough of a mayhem.
All good!
Completely agree...every KID player who handles it in a passive way loses most of their games by getting positionally crushed - only energetic play by black can attempt to undermine white's space advantage.
We could generalize and say that if black hasn't managed ...b5 or ...f5 by move 15, it's time to resign.
Master Om wrote:Means it needs more than a hour to find it in SPV ?
AFAIK no one uses 25 lines to analyse though.
Then whats the minimum MPV lines One should use to analyse ?
I do not know but maybe if you have 1 hour to analyze the best way to use it is to start with multi-pv with almost all the root moves except obvious tactical mistakes and reduce the number of lines after some minutes.
Well when I've suggested something like this before, it was denounced.
I imagined an exceptionally rich man with 50 very fast PCs. Each PC would analyse a different possible first move for the side to play.
People said it would yield less than 50 elo advantage over Stockfish running on 1 PC in single PV mode.
Master Om wrote:Means it needs more than a hour to find it in SPV ?
AFAIK no one uses 25 lines to analyse though.
Then whats the minimum MPV lines One should use to analyse ?
I do not know but maybe if you have 1 hour to analyze the best way to use it is to start with multi-pv with almost all the root moves except obvious tactical mistakes and reduce the number of lines after some minutes.
Well when I've suggested something like this before, it was denounced.
I imagined an exceptionally rich man with 50 very fast PCs. Each PC would analyse a different possible first move for the side to play.
People said it would yield less than 50 elo advantage over Stockfish running on 1 PC in single PV mode.
But I'm not not so sure.
Well we are not rich enough to find such pcs. So we need a poor way to find the best move. Now I have got a spark what to do in idea such that I dont miss any move. Your idea makes clear that programs are far for being perfect atleast in KID.
Ah, 20.f4! As expected. For a human this is quite obvious . Probably engines don't like it at first, as it leads to a 'weak' square on e5 and Bg7 gets more mobility.
Jeroen wrote:Ah, 20.f4! As expected. For a human this is quite obvious . Probably engines don't like it at first, as it leads to a 'weak' square on e5 and Bg7 gets more mobility.
. Probably engines don't like it at first, as it leads to a 'weak' square on e5 and Bg7 gets more mobility.