Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 12:23 pm
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
It plays with 8 cores on my PC, much to my surprise. It even shows 8 cores on CB GUI
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 12:23 pm
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
Akkad 052b
Panchess 0611
Panchess 0611
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
May be you have just hyperthreading enabled on a machine with 4 real cores?attakinski wrote:It plays with 8 cores on my PC, much to my surprise. It even shows 8 cores on CB GUI
Guenther
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 12:23 pm
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
I have an AMD Ryzen 1800.
I expected Counter to play with 1 core as its predecessors did. Did not adjust anything. Just to play against another weaker engine.
But to my surprise it showed 16 cores. It took all the available threads/cores.
I expected Counter to play with 1 core as its predecessors did. Did not adjust anything. Just to play against another weaker engine.
But to my surprise it showed 16 cores. It took all the available threads/cores.
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
May be it checks at runtime the max cores/threads available - that's bad for creating exact data for my list. (my hardware has 4 cores no HT)attakinski wrote:I have an AMD Ryzen 1800.
I expected Counter to play with 1 core as its predecessors did. Did not adjust anything. Just to play against another weaker engine.
But to my surprise it showed 16 cores. It took all the available threads/cores.
Would you mind to check what it reports on your hardware?
Just run it from the commandline and type 'uci' and look at the max value for 'threads'.
If it then also reports a max of 4 for the threads option I am clueless.
(BTW the AMD Ryzen is an 8 core machine, obviously you have HT on, then 16 threads appear)
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
Yes, it appears to check for max threads available. On my quadcore with HT on, Counter displays the following:Guenther wrote:May be it checks at runtime the max cores/threads available - that's bad for creating exact data for my list. (my hardware has 4 cores no HT)attakinski wrote:I have an AMD Ryzen 1800.
I expected Counter to play with 1 core as its predecessors did. Did not adjust anything. Just to play against another weaker engine.
But to my surprise it showed 16 cores. It took all the available threads/cores.
Would you mind to check what it reports on your hardware?
Just run it from the commandline and type 'uci' and look at the max value for 'threads'.
If it then also reports a max of 4 for the threads option I am clueless.
(BTW the AMD Ryzen is an 8 core machine, obviously you have HT on, then 16 threads appear)
Code: Select all
Counter 2.0.1
uci
id name Counter 2.0.1
id author Vadim Chizhov
option name Hash type spin default 4 min 4 max 512
option name Threads type spin default 8 min 1 max 8
option name ExperimentSettings type check default false
uciok
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
Ouch, that's really bad for improving my list. Thanks god only a few seem to do this. It would be very nice if someone - you Adam? :) - may check a list I will give later today or tomorrow.Adam Hair wrote:Yes, it appears to check for max threads available. On my quadcore with HT on, Counter displays the following:Guenther wrote:May be it checks at runtime the max cores/threads available - that's bad for creating exact data for my list. (my hardware has 4 cores no HT)attakinski wrote:I have an AMD Ryzen 1800.
I expected Counter to play with 1 core as its predecessors did. Did not adjust anything. Just to play against another weaker engine.
But to my surprise it showed 16 cores. It took all the available threads/cores.
Would you mind to check what it reports on your hardware?
Just run it from the commandline and type 'uci' and look at the max value for 'threads'.
If it then also reports a max of 4 for the threads option I am clueless.
(BTW the AMD Ryzen is an 8 core machine, obviously you have HT on, then 16 threads appear)
Code: Select all
Counter 2.0.1 uci id name Counter 2.0.1 id author Vadim Chizhov option name Hash type spin default 4 min 4 max 512 option name Threads type spin default 8 min 1 max 8 option name ExperimentSettings type check default false uciok
This list will contain all programs which report a max of 4 cores/threads etc. here.
BTW did you receive my mail with benchmarks? I assume you are quite busy lately? (I was to lazy to do more than one run for all core settings, sorry)
Best wishes,
Guenther
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
I will try to help out.Guenther wrote:Ouch, that's really bad for improving my list. Thanks god only a few seem to do this. It would be very nice if someone - you Adam? - may check a list I will give later today or tomorrow.Adam Hair wrote:Yes, it appears to check for max threads available. On my quadcore with HT on, Counter displays the following:Guenther wrote:May be it checks at runtime the max cores/threads available - that's bad for creating exact data for my list. (my hardware has 4 cores no HT)attakinski wrote:I have an AMD Ryzen 1800.
I expected Counter to play with 1 core as its predecessors did. Did not adjust anything. Just to play against another weaker engine.
But to my surprise it showed 16 cores. It took all the available threads/cores.
Would you mind to check what it reports on your hardware?
Just run it from the commandline and type 'uci' and look at the max value for 'threads'.
If it then also reports a max of 4 for the threads option I am clueless.
(BTW the AMD Ryzen is an 8 core machine, obviously you have HT on, then 16 threads appear)
Code: Select all
Counter 2.0.1 uci id name Counter 2.0.1 id author Vadim Chizhov option name Hash type spin default 4 min 4 max 512 option name Threads type spin default 8 min 1 max 8 option name ExperimentSettings type check default false uciok
This list will contain all programs which report a max of 4 cores/threads etc. here.
Yes, I did receive it and I responded last night.BTW did you receive my mail with benchmarks? I assume you are quite busy lately? (I was to lazy to do more than one run for all core settings, sorry)
Best wishes,
Guenther
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
What is the max limit Sven?Sven Schüle wrote:Jumbo 0.4.34 64-bit (supports as many cores as available)
Guenther
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Engines that can use 8 cores or more (July 2017)
Thanks in advance Adam. I had not yet checked the mails, now I seeAdam Hair wrote:I will try to help out.Guenther wrote:
Ouch, that's really bad for improving my list. Thanks god only a few seem to do this. It would be very nice if someone - you Adam? :) - may check a list I will give later today or tomorrow.
This list will contain all programs which report a max of 4 cores/threads etc. here.
Yes, I did receive it and I responded last night.BTW did you receive my mail with benchmarks? I assume you are quite busy lately? (I was to lazy to do more than one run for all core settings, sorry)
Best wishes,
Guenther
you had answered tonight.
Here is a simplified list extracted from the chronology (some errors corrected and some info omitted for simplicity):
There is still quite some work left. All entries with a '?' must be checked,
sometimes probably only the authors can tell the answer and/or the
owners of commercial programs with super hardware.
(even readmes or manuals didn't reveal the max info sometimes)
All entries with 4 max must be checked again (*), because those could be
just a result of the limitation of my own hardware.
Code: Select all
Name Vers. LR YM-LR MP Max Check
Amy 0.87b DC 2004-03 yes 2
Andscacs 0.91 2017-05 yes 128
Ant (& Gi-Ant) 2007-B / (Gi-Ant = MP) 2010-12 yes 4 *
ArabianKnight 1.55 2017-01 yes 256
ArasanX 20.1 2017-04 yes 64
Arminius 2017-01-01 2017-01 yes 32
BagaturChess 1.5c 2017-05 yes 64
BeRoChess 1.00-2012.04.10.0112 2012-04 yes 4 *
Bobcat 8.0 2016-11 yes 64
Booot 6.2 2017-05 yes 16
Bright 0.5c 2010-01 yes 8
BrutusChess 8.05 JA 2010-01 yes 8
BugChess2 1.9 2011-04 yes 8
Butcher (=Rzeznik) 1.64 2012-04 yes 30
Cheng4 (& Cheng3) 0.39 (Cheng4) 2015-07 yes 64
Chiron 4 2017-01 yes 512
Cinnamon (& Butterfly) 2.0 2016-04 yes 64
Counter 2.0.1 2017-06 yes 4 *
Crafty 25.2 PO 2016-10 yes ?
Critter 1.6a 2012-06 yes 32
DanChess CCT7 2005-02 yes ?
Delfi 5.4 2008-07 yes 2
Delphil 3.2 2014-09 yes 32
Demolito 20170618 2017-06 yes 64
Detroid 1.0 2017-05 yes 4 *
DisasterArea 1.65 2016-07 yes 8
Dorky 4.5 2016-09 yes ?
Dragontooth 0.2 Bahamut 2017-05 yes 128
Equinox* 3.30 2014-12 yes 32
EXchess 7.97 2017-02 yes 32
FireFly 2.70 2014-01 yes 4 *
Fizbo 1.9 2016-12 yes 56
Frenzee (Deep) 3.5.19 2011-11 yes #
Fridolin 2.0 2015-06 yes 4 *
Gogobello 1.2 2017-05 yes 8
GopherCheck 0.2.3 2017-02 yes 4 *
GullChess** 3 2016-07 yes 4 *
Hamsters 0.71 2008-11 yes 8
Hannibal 1.7 2016-08 yes 512
Hermann 2.8 2011-06 yes 8
Hiarcs (Deep) 14 2012-08 yes ?
HoiChess 0.21.0 2017-03 yes ?
Houdini* 5.01 / 5.01 Pro 2016-11 yes 128
Jazz (Orchestra) r840 2015-03 yes 16
Jellyfish 1.1 2015-04 yes 4 *
Jonny 4.00 2010-10 yes 128
Jumbo 0.4.34 2017-05 yes ?
Junior (Deep) 13.8.04 2013-11 yes ?
Komodo (&Doch) 11.01 2017-05 yes 64
Laser 1.4 2017-05 yes 128
LittleThought 1.052 2010-04 yes 8
Loop (& Loop List etc.) 2007 (=13.6) 2010-05 yes 16
MinkoChess (& Umko**) 1.3 JA 2012-05 yes 16
Myrddin 0.87 2015-01 yes 16
Napoleon (=NapoleonPP) 1.8 2017-06 yes 8
Naum* 4.6 2014-09 yes 16
Nebiyu 1.45 (II) 2013-11 yes ?
Nebula 2.0 2013-03 yes 16
Nemorino 3.00 2017-06 yes 128
OctoChess r5506 HK 2016-10 yes 4 *
Onno* 1.27 2010-05 yes 4 *
Patzer (Deep) 3.80 2006-08 yes ?
Pedone 1.6 2017-06 yes 128
Pharaon (& ZChess) 3.51 2006-03 yes 4 *
POSDeepBrute (& POS) 2.1 2013-12 yes ?
Project Invincible 2.10 2013-07 yes ?
Protector** 1.90 2015-10 yes 32
RedQueen 1.1.98 2015-08 yes 32
RodentIII(& R.II/R.**) III 0.172 / II 0.9.64 2017-03 yes 4 *
Rybka* 4.1 / Fritz 15 2015-11 yes 2048
Sayuri 2017.06.05 2017-06 yes 64
Scorpio 2.77 JA 2015-08 yes ?
Senpai 1.0 2014-03 yes 16
Shredder (Deep) 13 2016-10 yes 128
Sjeng (Deep) WC 2008 (MP) 2010-10 yes 4 *
Smash (Deep) 1.03a JV 2014-01 yes 4 *
Spark 1.0 2010-12 yes 16
Spike 1.4 build 84 2011-02 yes 12
Stockfish (& Glaurung) 8 / 17070307 (dev) 2017-07 yes 512
Texel 1.0.7a9 lazy 2017-03 yes 512
The Baron 3.29 2015-07 yes 12
TheKing (=Chessmaster) 3.50 (CM11) 2007-10 yes ?
Thinker* 5.4d 2009-03 yes 4 *
Tornado 8 2017-01 yes 64
Typhoon 1.00 rev358 JA 2008-08 yes ?
Tytan 9.32 2007-07 yes ?
Vajolet2 (& Vajolet) 2.3 2017-02 yes 128
Violet (Deep) 4.0 2016-10 yes ?
Viper 0.1 2006-05 yes 4 *
Wasp 2.01 2017-05 yes 64
Zappa MexicoII 2008-02 yes ?
ZCT 3.2500 JA 2009-06 yes ?
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...