What else do you call this post by yourself!?
Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:How could anyone forbid the use of SF, I mean, are you in your right mind?
Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:I will post, if anything just on this thread, as I can not post 100 replies in 5 threads.
will wait for the truth outing at some propicious point in time.
in the meantime, I would request pretty much everyone in this hating bunch, primarily Bram, Andreas, Possioto, Herbert, Vincent, etc., not to use SF for their analyses, as in SF code there have been at least 20 successful evaluation patches based on my ideas, and without those, SF would never have reached its current status.
do you want me to enumerate them all?
- advanced levers
- blocked storming pawns on the 6th rank
- edge a/h storming pawn, blocked by king
- minor-queen imbalances
- penalty for doubled pawns in terms of distnace between the pawns
- center bind bonus
- penalty for low mobility pieces on the edge
etc., etc., at least 20!
other ideas of mine have served for successful patches too, indirectly, because the primary notion has been mine, or because my suggestions have spurred thoughts along similar lines.
for example, a piece protector bonus has been proposed by me and tested at the framework long time ago.
attacking squares on the king side, not part of the shelter, too
bonus for penetration points, currently, minors attacking an outpost square
also, pawn push threat, and
most importantly, psqt bonus for connected defended and duo pawns in terms of rank, implemented in late 2013 by Joerg Oster and Ralph Stoesser.
do you know that this patch was a turning point in SF's development?
omly after it, SF began playing in a more positional vein, considering its advanced pawns.
only after it, SF was able to become the strongest engine on the planet!
without it, quite probably it would not have done so.
because of it, SF is currently playing KIDs best.
all these patches and the subsequent SF rise would have been impossible without me.
do you consider that at all, when attacking me in such an atrocious manner?
that is why, I would kindly ask you not to use SF any more in your tests and analyses.
Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:Ulisses P, Lanzo Nazaire and VR are the same person, right?
Nah, Ulysses P is the only account I have used on Talkchess. I was Uly and Vytron at Rybka Forum and OpenChess. I was Dylan Sharp at Hiarcs Forum. I've been Ovyron, and Yntec at other places.
When confronted, I always admit to my other nicknames in places, even when it causes me great trouble (the greatest trouble I faced was when I, as Dylan Sharp, admitted to Harvey Williamson that I was Ulysses P, and all hell broke loose and I lost my position as Captain of both Hiarcs Forum and Rybka Forum in the middle of a game, I'd have saved weeks of suffering by just withholding this info! But even my enemies can attest, that I'm always truthful when it comes to nicknames... when confronted.)
It's still nice to be confused with Vasik Rajlich, though