Re: Incredible Stockfish Patch
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:00 am
Many are looking forward to this. I always liked learning programs and this will be the best one.
thank you very much for updating the Cerebellum a0 Analysis Page ...Thomas Zipproth wrote:Thanks for your support. You are right, Cerebellum and the Sirius Gui will be published.Leo wrote:Once Brainfish and the Cerebellum Library (not yet released) is available for purchase then we can make our own learning library.
The delay is due to a lack of time , but currently I'm working on the project. I will publish a new release date as soon as I can predict it reliable.
Btw, I have updated the Cerebellum AlphaZero Analysis Page to make it more readable.
http://www.zipproth.de/Brainfish/Cerebe ... aZero.html
Thomas
I am not going to disagree with you there. I've said it...I'll say it again, most of these 'engine programmers' are spending their time being little more than guys who tweak here, tweak there, test and hope to hit upon something. Just my humble opinion...people can throw their tomatoes if they like...Ovyron wrote:Indeed, Houdini attempted a learning feature, but it was so bad nobody used it and it was removed from later versions....etccarldaman wrote:Stockfish and Houdini would be worth much less in comparison, if that were to happen.
Why don't other top free engine authors implement learning? They're too busy chasing elo, what with them not even fully implementing UCI? etc
Well, I don't know how controversial what I'm going to say is going to sound, but particularly for Houdini, here's my report of the engine's analysis quality for correspondence games (and I claim this would hold for any kind of analysis.)leavenfish wrote:I am not going to disagree with you there. I've said it...I'll say it again, most of these 'engine programmers' are spending their time being little more than guys who tweak here, tweak there, test and hope to hit upon something. Just my humble opinion...people can throw their tomatoes if they like...