Says you, who obviously has no clue.Krzysztof Grzelak wrote:You need to change the way programmers think. Too many programmers fell into the so-called programming experience - and this is not good.Evert wrote:I tried to add elo++ in my own code, but sadly it didn't help.
Tell you what though, if you think it's so easy to improve Stockfish, why don't you prove it?
I have a notion of what I write, because in this respect nothing has changed.syzygy wrote:Says you, who obviously has no clue.
No you don't.Krzysztof Grzelak wrote:I have a notion of what I write, because in this respect nothing has changed.syzygy wrote:Says you, who obviously has no clue.
Krzysztof Grzelak wrote:You need to change the way programmers think. Too many programmers fell into the so-called programming experience - and this is not good.Evert wrote:I tried to add elo++ in my own code, but sadly it didn't help.
Tell you what though, if you think it's so easy to improve Stockfish, why don't you prove it?
I am sorry but what you are aiming for now.syzygy wrote:No you don't.
It worked! Thanks to all people who suggested this magic Ctrl + F5. I'll try it again tomorrow to check if there's a SF 10 release!tpoppins wrote:
Try Ctrl+F5 in your browser.
Perhaps yes, maybe no, I do not know.Hai wrote:You only need to rent amazon ec2 instances and donate them to Stockfish framework.
For example if the Stockfish framework needs 100 cores + 3 years for 100 ELO.
You should change it into much more cores and much less time for 100 ELO.
If everybody here would rent and donate at least 1 machine, then Stockfish would reach +100 ELO after 6 months.
funny post, interesting.syzygy wrote:No you don't.Krzysztof Grzelak wrote:I have a notion of what I write, because in this respect nothing has changed.syzygy wrote:Says you, who obviously has no clue.
Clearly elo++ is only going to increment by 1. You need to add a for loop e.g.Evert wrote:I tried to add elo++ in my own code, but sadly it didn't help.
Code: Select all
for(i = 0; i < desired_improvement; i++) elo++;