Re: free Aquarium
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 10:32 am
P.S.
Brainfish does not measure engine strength. 100% of the boost in strength is data.
Brainfish does not measure engine strength. 100% of the boost in strength is data.
Really?syzygy wrote:The update was not by him...Rodolfo Leoni wrote:I needed to tell I sometimes use the recent update by Michael Byrne.
This is just a fork, which always adds changes from the real asmfish github and gives compilations (and only since not very long) - please read the commits.Rodolfo Leoni wrote:Really?syzygy wrote:The update was not by him... :roll:Rodolfo Leoni wrote:I needed to tell I sometimes use the recent update by Michael Byrne.
https://github.com/MichaelB7/asmFish/re ... g/01202018
The version by Mike Byrne has some of McBrain features, like UCI_ELO or support for Cerebellum. And I was exactly refering to that version. It's matter of security check in free Aquarium server. If you log, you can find SF8 in compatible, SF9 not yet. So if Michael Rohleder includes a version that is only half byte different from the one I'm using, I cannot connect the engine to the server. This caution is to avoid fools to rename a crappy engine to SF or Komodo and to destroy the book.Guenther wrote:This is just a fork, which always adds changes from the real asmfish github and gives compilations (and only since not very long) - please read the commits.Rodolfo Leoni wrote:Really?syzygy wrote:The update was not by him...Rodolfo Leoni wrote:I needed to tell I sometimes use the recent update by Michael Byrne.
https://github.com/MichaelB7/asmFish/re ... g/01202018
This was probably only setup for the confused, who wanted new compilations for asmfish despite there were only 'cosmetic changes' since 11/17.
This is the real one:
https://github.com/lantonov/asmFish
A short circuit. You need to be right? Feel free.syzygy wrote:What is so difficult about this: there is no asmFish version by Mike Byrne.
He just typed "make". There is no authorship in typing "make".
And contrary to what you seem to believe, proper attribution is important. In particular, misattribution should be avoided.
On the contrary, I try to admit a mistake whenever I realise I made one. How about you?Rodolfo Leoni wrote:A short circuit. You need to be right? Feel free.syzygy wrote:What is so difficult about this: there is no asmFish version by Mike Byrne.
He just typed "make". There is no authorship in typing "make".
And contrary to what you seem to believe, proper attribution is important. In particular, misattribution should be avoided.
The only possible mistake on my side could have been the use of the word "version" instead of "release". Could be, but I still consider Cerebellum addition a substantial change. Mike Byrne didn't just type "make" and Carebellum + UCI_ELO suddenly appeared by some magic or divine intervention. So I consider it a version.syzygy wrote:On the contrary, I try to admit a mistake whenever I realise I made one. How about you?Rodolfo Leoni wrote:A short circuit. You need to be right? Feel free.syzygy wrote:What is so difficult about this: there is no asmFish version by Mike Byrne.
He just typed "make". There is no authorship in typing "make".
And contrary to what you seem to believe, proper attribution is important. In particular, misattribution should be avoided.
If I misread that you were still referring to an asmFish version "by" someone who is clearly not an author, then I apologise for my mistake. But did i misread?
Do you mean this topic?Rodolfo Leoni wrote:The best thing you can do is to post your opinion about it in the original topic by Mike Byrne. It's not difficult to find. Could be at page 5 or 6 on this forum.
You read the opening post and was misled by it. So now you know.MikeB wrote:It is pure amsfish , assembly is not something I should tinker with.