Stockfish 160318 64 POPCNT (8 threads): 31.2 plies; 6.863kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz 2592MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads)
Not usual.
[pgn] [Event "Rated game, 2 min"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2018.03.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Chessbulle"]
[Black "Grand-father"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C44"]
[WhiteElo "1584"]
[BlackElo "2016"]
[PlyCount "236"]
[EventDate "2018.03.20"]
[SourceTitle "playchess.com"]
[TimeControl "120"]
1. e4 {B 0} e5 {1} 2. Cf3 {B 0} Cc6 {1} 3. Ac4 {B 0} Ad6 {1} 4. O-O {B 0} Cf6 {
1} 5. c3 {0.97/23 6} Ae7 {2 (0-0)} 6. d4 {1.06/23 2} d6 {1} 7. Ad3 {0.80/23 1}
O-O {2 (Lg4)} 8. d5 {0.75/21 3} Cb8 {1} 9. Ae3 {0.72/23 0} Ce8 {2 (Lg4)} 10. h3
{1.23/21 2} b6 {0 (c6)} 11. c4 {1.31/24 5} g6 {1 (Sd7)} 12. Ah6 {2} Cg7 {
1.41/22 0} 13. Cc3 {1.28/23 6} f6 {1 (f5)} 14. g4 {1.55/19 2} Tf7 {4 (Sd7)} 15.
Rh1 {1.64/22 4} Cd7 {2} 16. Tg1 {1.67/21 0} Cf8 {1 (a5)} 17. h4 {1.95/19 1} a6
{3 (Sd7)} 18. h5 {2.03/21 6} g5 {1 (Lb7)} 19. Cd2 {2.14/22 8} Cd7 {11 (c6)} 20.
Cf1 {2.15/21 2} Af8 {1} 21. a3 {2.20/22 1} Ce8 {1} 22. Axf8 {3} Cxf8 {2.18/25 0
} 23. Ce3 {2.15/24 1} h6 {2 (Sg7)} 24. Dd2 {2.07/23 4} Rh7 {2 (Sg7)} 25. Rg2 {
2.27/20 3} Ab7 {1 (Sg7)} 26. Tgd1 {2.30/22 6} Cg7 {1 (c5)} 27. f3 {2.24/22 3}
Cd7 {1 (c6)} 28. Ac2 {2.27/20 1} De7 {1 (Tf8)} 29. b4 {2.35/31 1} Tff8 {8} 30.
Aa4 {2.35/29 1} Ta7 {3 (a5)} 31. Dc2 {2.28/17 3} Tfa8 {1 (Td8)} 32. Tdc1 {
2.39/20 3} Rh8 {6 (Td8)} 33. Axd7 {2.39/23 3} Dxd7 {2} 34. c5 {2.51/26 0} De7 {
12 (dxc5)} 35. c6 {3.40/27 1} Ac8 {2} 36. a4 {3.40/36 0} Rg8 {9 (Tb8)} 37. a5 {
3.54/31 1} b5 {2} 38. Ce2 {3.54/44 0} Ce8 {9 (Tb8)} 39. Rf2 {3.54/41 1} Rg7 {
1 (Sg7)} 40. Te1 {3.54/40 1} Rh8 {0 (Df7)} 41. Rg2 {3.54/38 1} Rg7 {0 (Sg7)}
42. Th1 {1} Rh8 {3.54/41 0 (Kg8)} 43. The1 {3.54/41 1} Rh7 {0 (Sg7)} 44. Cg3 {
3.54/40 1} Rh8 {1 (Df7)} 45. Dc3 {3.54/39 1} Dh7 {1 (Kg8)} 46. Dd3 {3.54/38 1}
Rg8 {0} 47. Tab1 {3.54/41 0} Rf8 {1 (Df7)} 48. Dc3 {3.54/39 1} Rg8 {1} 49. Tbc1
{3.54/44 0} Rf8 {1 (Df7)} 50. Te2 {1} Rg8 {3.54/41 0} 51. Td2 {0} Rf8 {3.54/39
0 (De7)} 52. Th1 {1} Rg8 {3.54/39 0} 53. Te2 {0} Rf8 {3.54/39 0 (Tb8)} 54. Rf2
{1} Rg8 {3.54/40 0} 55. Tee1 {0} Rf8 {3.54/42 0 (Sg7)} 56. Thf1 {1} Rg8 {
3.54/39 0} 57. Th1 {0} Rf8 {3.54/43 0 (Sg7)} 58. Dd3 {1} Rg8 {3.54/43 0} 59.
Dc2 {0} Rf8 {3.54/43 0 (Sg7)} 60. Tc1 {1} Rg8 {3.54/39 0} 61. Rg2 {3.54/42 0}
Rh8 {1 (Df7)} 62. The1 {1} Rg8 {3.54/41 0} 63. Th1 {0} Rh8 {3.54/45 0 (Df7)}
64. Tb1 {1} Rg8 {3.54/41 0} 65. Dc3 {0} Rh8 {3.54/42 0 (Sg7)} 66. Rg1 {1} Rg8 {
3.54/37 0} 67. Tb2 {0} Rh8 {3.54/40 0 (Tb8)} 68. Thh2 {1} Rg8 {3.54/40 0} 69.
Thc2 {0} Rh8 {3.54/37 0 (Kg7)} 70. Th2 {1} Rg8 {3.54/37 0} 71. Tbf2 {0} Rh8 {
3.54/35 0 (Df7)} 72. Dd2 {2} Rg8 {3.54/34 0} 73. Dd3 {0} Rh8 {3.54/33 0 (Df7)}
74. Thg2 {1} Rg8 {3.54/29 0 (Df7)} 75. Tc2 {4} Rh8 {3.54/29 0 (Df7)} 76. Tc1 {
3.54/25 1} Rg8 {1} 77. Tb2 {3.54/23 0} Rh8 {0 (Sg7)} 78. Th2 {1} Rg8 {3.54/20 0
} 79. Th1 {0} Rh8 {3.54/21 0 (Sg7)} 80. Th2 {2} Rg8 {3.54/18 0} 81. Td1 {
3.46/16 0} Rh8 {0 (Kf8)} 82. Thd2 {3.38/17 2} Rg8 {0} 83. Dc3 {3.31/18 0} Rh8 {
0 (Df7)} 84. Te1 {1.50/20 1} Rg8 {0} 85. Cgf5 {1.61/25 0} Axf5 {2 (Kf7)} 86.
exf5 {0} Rh8 {2.12/22 0 (Df7)} 87. Cd1 {2.19/29 0} Rg8 {0 (Tb8)} 88. De3 {
2.61/26 0} Rf8 {0 (De7)} 89. Cf2 {3.25/29 0} Rf7 {0 (Df7)} 90. Rg2 {3.25/31 0}
Rf8 {1 (Kg8)} 91. Ted1 {0} Rf7 {3.25/31 0 (Df7)} 92. Te1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/33 0
(Kg8)} 93. Tde2 {0} Rf7 {3.25/34 0 (Df7)} 94. Ce4 {0} Rf8 {3.25/30 0 (Kg7)} 95.
Td1 {0} Rf7 {3.25/30 0 (Kg8)} 96. Th1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/29 0 (Kg8)} 97. Rf2 {0} Rf7
{3.25/30 0 (Kg8)} 98. Td1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/30 0 (Kg7)} 99. Tde1 {0} Rf7 {3.25/26
0 (Df7)} 100. Rg1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/28 0 (Kg8)} 101. Rf2 {0} Rf7 {3.25/28 0 (Df7)}
102. Rg1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/30 0 (Kg8)} 103. Ta1 {0} Rf7 {3.25/26 0 (Df7)} 104. Tc1
{0} Rf8 {3.25/24 0 (Kg7)} 105. Rg2 {0} Rf7 {3.25/22 0 (Df7)} 106. Tee1 {0} Rf8
{3.25/22 0 (Kg7)} 107. Tcd1 {0} Rf7 {3.25/23 0 (Df7)} 108. Tf1 {0} Rf8 {
3.25/20 0 (Kg8)} 109. Th1 {0} Rf7 {3.25/23 0 (Kg8)} 110. The1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/23
0 (Kg8)} 111. Td2 {0} Rf7 {3.25/24 0 (Kg8)} 112. Tf2 {0} Rf8 {3.25/22 0 (Kg8)}
113. Td2 {0} Rf7 {3.25/21 0 (Kg8)} 114. Tee2 {0} Rf8 {3.25/23 0 (Kg8)} 115. Td1
{0} Rf7 {3.25/23 0 (Kg8)} 116. Tde1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/21 0 (Dg7)} 117. Th1 {0} Rf7
{3.25/23 0} 118. Td1 {0} Rf8 {3.25/39 0 (Kg7)} 0-1[/pgn]
[pgn]r3nk2/r1p4q/p1Pp1p1p/Pp1PpPpP/1P2N1P1/4QP2/4R1K1/3R4 w - - 0 119[pgn]
Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing e4
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:39 am
- Location: Colombia
- Full name: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing e4
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:39 am
- Location: Colombia
- Full name: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Again I need help or a hand to motion,Thanks in advance...
Again I need help to the motion,Thanks in advance...
Best regards chess community,
Pablo Ignacio
Father @ Grand-Father playchess.com usser
Best regards chess community,
Pablo Ignacio
Father @ Grand-Father playchess.com usser
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:39 am
- Location: Colombia
- Full name: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
[pgn]r3nk2/r1p4q/p1Pp1p1p/Pp1PpPpP/1P2N1P1/4QP2/4R1K1/3R4 w - - 0 119[/pgn]
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
-
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
you have been posting the same game for years. what is your rating 1500? top programs are 3400. what is your point? why do you keep repeating yourself?
no chess program was born totally from one mind. all chess programs have many ideas from many minds.
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
He believes to be the last man standing in the man vs machine chess war.kgburcham wrote:you have been posting the same game for years. what is your rating 1500? top programs are 3400. what is your point? why do you keep repeating yourself?
At least these games are real (Pablo really went and used Premove to take advantage of lag and buggy GUI with engine not configured to compensate to win on time), unlike other people's fabrications...
Your beliefs create your reality, so be careful what you wish for.
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:37 am
- Location: TURKEY
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
+1kgburcham wrote:you have been posting the same game for years. what is your rating 1500? top programs are 3400. what is your point? why do you keep repeating yourself?
-
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:34 pm
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
There's no way top engines are 3400.kgburcham wrote:you have been posting the same game for years. what is your rating 1500? top programs are 3400. what is your point? why do you keep repeating yourself?
I honestly believe that top programs are over-rated.
The problem is that engines don't compete in FIDE against top humans so we can't really know how strong top engines really are.
If the top chess engines were to compete against the top humans like Vladimir Kramnik, Gary Kasparov, Vasily Smyslov, Magnus Carlsen, Anatoly Karpov, Vishy Anand and Hikaru Nakamura then only then we could know how strong they really are.
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:20 am
- Location: New Hampshire
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
Well there are games with GM Hikaru Nakamura (Elo 2787) . Every time I see the GM's play the computers they never play on equal terms, the computer always has to start by missing a pawn or down an exchange etc.Uri wrote:There's no way top engines are 3400.kgburcham wrote:you have been posting the same game for years. what is your rating 1500? top programs are 3400. what is your point? why do you keep repeating yourself?
I honestly believe that top programs are over-rated.
The problem is that engines don't compete in FIDE against top humans so we can't really know how strong top engines really are.
If the top chess engines were to compete against the top humans like Vladimir Kramnik, Gary Kasparov, Vasily Smyslov, Magnus Carlsen, Anatoly Karpov, Vishy Anand and Hikaru Nakamura then only then we could know how strong they really are.
There used to be a Harvard Cup where the top human players played against the top computers but they don't dare do that any more.
https://www.chess.com/news/view/komodo- ... attle-1331
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:39 am
- Location: Colombia
- Full name: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
Jhon.
Not anymore have not exist more public competitions. Exist silence and lies.
Not anymore have not exist more public competitions. Exist silence and lies.
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:11 pm
- Location: upstate
Re: Human humiliates in bullet to the supercomputer playing
Easy on the hyperbole, Don Pablo. The i7-6700HQ is a laptop processor that might have qualified as a supercomputer chip 30 years ago, not today. Ten years ago there were desktops at least as fast.
And I don't think bullet games are of interest to anyone.
And I don't think bullet games are of interest to anyone.