glennsamuel32 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 10:13 pm
What's the point in working backwards from move 175 when move 5 is dubious ???
Also, I'm showing that move 5 could not have happened with stronger engines...
Btw, what's the TC ?
You don't seem to understand this position at all.
Play from this with black with your super engines. I will be white and i will win easily https://lichess.org/575tw2EV
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
glennsamuel32 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 10:13 pm
What's the point in working backwards from move 175 when move 5 is dubious ???
Also, I'm showing that move 5 could not have happened with stronger engines...
Btw, what's the TC ?
if you want to prove it's not a mate, find the LATEST point in the move order where mate is impossible (0.00 eval that you trust/cannot resolve). share that here & someone will either give you the appropriate reply or you'll have proven your point.
'solving' from the beginning is wasting a tremendous amount of your time, unless you think people are just making up the mate in 127, in which case i don't know why you'd even bother.
glennsamuel32 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 10:13 pm
What's the point in working backwards from move 175 when move 5 is dubious ???
Also, I'm showing that move 5 could not have happened with stronger engines...
Btw, what's the TC ?
if you want to prove it's not a mate, find the LATEST point in the move order where mate is impossible (0.00 eval that you trust/cannot resolve). share that here & someone will either give you the appropriate reply or you'll have proven your point.
'solving' from the beginning is wasting a tremendous amount of your time, unless you think people are just making up the mate in 127, in which case i don't know why you'd even bother.
If you still don't get the point I'm trying to make, feel free to ignore my post or even me for that matter.
You can use the button...
