Page 19 of 25

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 8:06 pm
by xr_a_y
Minic 1.19 is now released

I shall be a little stronger due to some history (included CMH) tuning
Some UCI fixes about pondering, but probably still not ok

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:32 am
by xr_a_y
The given figure is Minic SMP scaling in elo from 1 to 8 threads on a i7-9700K using only 256Mb hash.
What are your opinion on it ?

Code: Select all

   1 minic_dev_8_threads            94      24     303   63.2%   61.1%
   2 minic_dev_7_threads            70      22     303   59.9%   65.7%
   3 minic_dev_6_threads            66      24     303   59.4%   61.4%
   4 minic_dev_5_threads            25      22     302   53.6%   66.9%
   5 minic_dev_4_threads            10      24     302   51.5%   63.9%
   6 minic_dev_3_threads           -24      23     302   46.5%   64.6%
   7 minic_dev_2_threads           -74      25     302   39.6%   57.9%
   8 minic_dev                    -180      28     303   26.2%   45.9%

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:40 am
by Guenther
xr_a_y wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:32 am The given figure is Minic SMP scaling in elo from 1 to 8 threads on a i7-9700K using only 256Mb hash.
What are your opinion on it ?

Code: Select all

   1 minic_dev_8_threads            94      24     303   63.2%   61.1%
   2 minic_dev_7_threads            70      22     303   59.9%   65.7%
   3 minic_dev_6_threads            66      24     303   59.4%   61.4%
   4 minic_dev_5_threads            25      22     302   53.6%   66.9%
   5 minic_dev_4_threads            10      24     302   51.5%   63.9%
   6 minic_dev_3_threads           -24      23     302   46.5%   64.6%
   7 minic_dev_2_threads           -74      25     302   39.6%   57.9%
   8 minic_dev                    -180      28     303   26.2%   45.9%
Is the third column the average error bar?

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 1:19 pm
by CMCanavessi
To me it looks like elo, error, games played, % of points, % of draws.

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 1:32 pm
by Alayan
xr_a_y wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:32 am The given figure is Minic SMP scaling in elo from 1 to 8 threads on a i7-9700K using only 256Mb hash.
What are your opinion on it ?
This data is not very useful, because what really matters is how single-core with T time compare to N threads with T/N time (keeping the total hardware time the same). Giving the same time to different threads count creates an extra dependency on how much strength Minic gains with extra time at the bullet TC you used.

The ideal measure would be "time to elo" curves, but that requires more effort to get that T - 1 vs T/N - N.

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 6:32 pm
by xr_a_y
CMCanavessi wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 1:19 pm To me it looks like elo, error, games played, % of points, % of draws.
Exactly, cutechess output, sorry for the missed header.

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:18 am
by xr_a_y
I've just released Minic 1.21 with some fixes (UCI support shall be better/good ?).
This is the version that may be used for TCEC in a few days :D

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:16 pm
by xr_a_y
Late patch for TCEC : Minic 1.22 is available

Not well tested versus other engines :oops: , mainly intuition ... so I keep fingers crossed ...

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:45 pm
by CMCanavessi
Did you fix ponder or it's still on the to-do list?

Re: A complete 2000 lines of code engine

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:01 pm
by xr_a_y
CMCanavessi wrote: Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:45 pm Did you fix ponder or it's still on the to-do list?
Ponder UCI option is here.
"Ponder move" is displayed but I'm still not sure how to handle ponderhit.
I see other engines going from "infinite mode" to "timed mode" and continue to search, but I don't get that.
So for now I just stop search on ponderhit and wait for another go command.

I feel silly about that.

After reading http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 9&start=50, I am even more lost.