Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
Javier Ros
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:48 am
Location: Seville (SPAIN)
Full name: Javier Ros

Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by Javier Ros » Sun Oct 28, 2018 12:59 pm

From one of my tests, lc0 played the opening novelty 10..h5 putting the rook in play in an original way and sacrificing it later for a bishop.

19. Bg5 {lc0 0.00/27 16} Rxg5 {Sf9 1.31/14 7.7s}

After 74..Rxg6 the next incredible position was reached, where Sf9 is cornered and lost.



Stockfish 9 with two logical cores of the i7 980x, which allows calculating about 2.9 million nodes per second against 3300 of lc0 11261(GTX 1060 3Gb), with a ratio of:
LeR = 3300 * 875/2900000 = 0.996
Both played from Silver Test Suite without tablebases at 16 seconds per move.


The love relationship between a chess engine tester and his computer can be summarized in one sentence:
Until heat do us part.

jdart
Posts: 3842
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 4:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by jdart » Sun Oct 28, 2018 1:41 pm

It can play really nice positional chess. But it still seems to have occasional tactical blindness. The modern alpha-beta engines are so selective, they are throwing out huge pieces of the search tree. But it is still kind of amazing to me that these NN engines can play as well as they do, since they are effectively visiting even less of the tree.

--Jon

peter
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by peter » Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:12 pm

Hi!
Javier Ros wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 12:59 pm
From one of my tests, lc0 played the opening novelty 10..h5
That's not a novelty. It's just transposing to other less seldom played move orders and therefore not in all books to be found at once, but it's even in Brainfish- Cerebellum too.
Not to be played actively but to be answered with 11.h3 by Brainfish.
Answering 11.Kb1 instead leads to lines in Hiarcs online and in Noomen- book again.
Peter.

Javier Ros
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:48 am
Location: Seville (SPAIN)
Full name: Javier Ros

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by Javier Ros » Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:46 pm

peter wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:12 pm
Hi!
Javier Ros wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 12:59 pm
From one of my tests, lc0 played the opening novelty 10..h5
That's not a novelty. It's just transposing to other less seldom played move orders and therefore not in all books to be found at once, but it's even in Brainfish- Cerebellum too.
Not to be played actively but to be answered with 11.h3 by Brainfish.
Answering 11.Kb1 instead leads to lines in Hiarcs online and in Noomen- book again.
You are right, although it doesn't appear in the bigbases, after 11.h3 it appears by transposition, the novelty is 11..h4.
The love relationship between a chess engine tester and his computer can be summarized in one sentence:
Until heat do us part.

MikeGL
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:49 pm

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by MikeGL » Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:02 pm

Javier Ros wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 12:59 pm
From one of my tests, lc0 played the opening novelty 10..h5 putting the rook in play in an original way and sacrificing it later for a bishop.

19. Bg5 {lc0 0.00/27 16} Rxg5 {Sf9 1.31/14 7.7s}

After 74..Rxg6 the next incredible position was reached, where Sf9 is cornered and lost.



Stockfish 9 with two logical cores of the i7 980x, which allows calculating about 2.9 million nodes per second against 3300 of lc0 11261(GTX 1060 3Gb), with a ratio of:
LeR = 3300 * 875/2900000 = 0.996
Both played from Silver Test Suite without tablebases at 16 seconds per move.


Thanks for this instructive endgame. Funny how a B pair of LC0 defeats R-pair of SF9.
Amazingly done by ensuring few or no open files are made by Lc0 so as to make the rooks weaker than bishops.
I told my wife that a husband is like a fine wine; he gets better with age. The next day, she locked me in the cellar.

peter
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by peter » Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:11 pm

Javier Ros wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:46 pm
You are right, although it doesn't appear in the bigbases, after 11.h3 it appears by transposition, the novelty is 11..h4.
Also only if you don't look for transpositions in online- database, e.g. chessbase.
After 12 moves of the engine- game that transposes to this one after 11 moves. Difference comes from LC0 playing h6-h5 in two steps, which may be new, but one could simply call it loss of tempo too, even if LC0 is not to blame for that fully, having had 8...h6 in "book".


And we are in Noomen- book again and in Cerebellum too.
Peter.

User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 3109
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon
Contact:

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by Guenther » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:32 pm

peter wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:11 pm
...
After 12 moves of the engine- game that transposes to this one after 11 moves. Difference comes from LC0 playing h6-h5 in two steps, which may be new, but one could simply call it loss of tempo too, even if LC0 is not to blame for that fully, having had 8...h6 in "book".
...
And we are in Noomen- book again and in Cerebellum too.
There is no loss of tempo, you missed that a full move pair is inserted with Bg5 h6.
Current foe list count : [101]
http://rwbc-chess.de/chronology.htm

peter
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Opening novelty, positional exchange sacrifice by lc0 and incredible position

Post by peter » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:27 pm

Guenther wrote:
Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:32 pm
There is no loss of tempo, you missed that a full move pair is inserted with Bg5 h6.
There is loss of tempo yet, but for both sides compared to Nijboer-Bosboom.
That's why the same position is reached one move earlier there with same side to move, that's what I meant.
Peter.

Post Reply