Houston: We have lift off ...
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
many are testing 30xxx vs 11248.. seems 11248 is finally within reach (30 elo away)
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
what's the network size for 11248?whereagles wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:45 pm many are testing 30xxx vs 11248.. seems 11248 is finally within reach (30 elo away)
-
- Posts: 2071
- Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:40 am
- Location: Dune
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
I highly doubt that. I have it at just slightly stronger than Stockfish 5 1CPU at 1 minute blitz and my tests run 200 games each. The best I've gotten from a test30 net is a 59% score which would put it about 60 elo stronger than SF5 1CPU on my machine (Ryzen 5 2600 with Nvidia 1080). If I had a 2080ti maybe it would perform about 100 elo higher on my machine than SF5 but that would still not put it anywhere near the best Test10 net 11250 which is about as strong as Stockfish 9.Laskos wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 6:39 amYes, 1m + 1s. It is close, Test30 is about 100 Elo points weaker than Test10.Leto wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:18 amI don't think Test30 is this close to Test10 in strength, I still think it's several hundred elo weaker. What's 60" + 1", is that game in 1 minute with an extra second per move?Laskos wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 3:56 pm I don't know why you are so enthusiastic. Runs 20xxx and 30xxx are pretty pathetic, especially considering how much resources they have eaten up. Some folks there have overdone something. Just a quick check with the latest engine (rc4) and one of the latest nets:
TC: 60'' + 1''
So, run 30xxx is still ~150 Elo points below run 10xxx, and barely ~100 Elo points above 6x64 net 9155 (run 9xxx). Taking into account that the games with 6x64 net were 10-12 times faster and taking into account the hardware resources allocated, the whole run 9xxx could have been completed in less than a day. Lame runs, these newest ones. But I still hope that they will improve some 200 real Elo points over current level, although this is not granted at all.Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws SF8 120 68 60 66.7% 43.3% 1 lc0_v19_11261 0 111 20 50.0% 50.0% 2 lc0_v19_31214 -147 128 20 30.0% 40.0% 3 lc0_v19_9155 -241 127 20 20.0% 40.0% Finished match
See this chart, it has 11250 between 200 and 300 elo stronger than the current test30 networks: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =952456918
-
- Posts: 1470
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:54 am
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Same size. Only 9xxx are smaller.chrisw wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:05 pmwhat's the network size for 11248?whereagles wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:45 pm many are testing 30xxx vs 11248.. seems 11248 is finally within reach (30 elo away)
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
sorry to be a pain, but what size is same size?
-
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:13 am
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Where can network 11248 be downloaded?
Thanks!![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Thanks!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:06 pm
- Location: Argentina
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
20 blocks, 256 filters
Follow my tournament and some Leela gauntlets live at http://twitch.tv/ccls
-
- Posts: 4317
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
thanks. now I know this “good” version was with a large net.CMCanavessi wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 1:13 am20 blocks, 256 filters
ok, the point I’ld like to make is this:
LC0 puts out a new net often, in a continuous stream, is quite a while since I downloaded one, but IIRC there were new nets every day. they get kind of tested at LC0 HQ in self play, but also tested kind of randomly by end users. With occasional post reports about how net XYZ is amazing or is crud depending, probably on the phase of the moon. Now if there are random tests on a stream of nets, there is also noise being testing. Net A0054 might have some fortuitous noise that causes it to play better, but when Net A0054 gets a bit of training and becomes Net A0055 the fortuitous noise changes and Net0055 doesn’t seem to perform so well, maybe, and so it goes on. What am i saying? Ok, there’s a difference between fortuitous noise that gives a higher ego signal, but is then lost, because it was only noise, and stable learnt weights which don’t lose their “knowledge” because that stable knowledge is genuinely there, and not lost with more “learning” twiddling. So, in any learning run, there will will random elo noise, and its no good pointing at, say 11345, and holding its elo as a target, if 11346 and 11347 and so on don’t hold the headline elo that 11345 achieved. If 11345 successors can’t hold the headline elo, then that elo was just fortuitous noise, not anything stably learnt.
You can’t just pick one net out of a series and claim the series is “best”, you need to show stability in the series in general. I don’t think that’s been shown, for any net series actually. Occasional headline glitches don’t mean anything, if they can’t be held, they’re not there.
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
main network site
https://lczero.org/networks/
do search for 11248 or just click the link below'
https://lczero.org/get_network?sha=994d ... 74419caecd
I would grab 11260 as well..
https://lczero.org/get_network?sha=7c06 ... f910af8841
-
- Posts: 1470
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:54 am
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
1xxxx, 2xxxx, 3xxxx are all 20x256.
9xxx are 6x64.
(Just seeing more recent posts now.)