Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:45 pm
many are testing 30xxx vs 11248.. seems 11248 is finally within reach (30 elo away)
Hosted by Your Move Chess & Games - chessusa.com
I highly doubt that. I have it at just slightly stronger than Stockfish 5 1CPU at 1 minute blitz and my tests run 200 games each. The best I've gotten from a test30 net is a 59% score which would put it about 60 elo stronger than SF5 1CPU on my machine (Ryzen 5 2600 with Nvidia 1080). If I had a 2080ti maybe it would perform about 100 elo higher on my machine than SF5 but that would still not put it anywhere near the best Test10 net 11250 which is about as strong as Stockfish 9.Laskos wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 5:39 amYes, 1m + 1s. It is close, Test30 is about 100 Elo points weaker than Test10.Leto wrote: ↑Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:18 amI don't think Test30 is this close to Test10 in strength, I still think it's several hundred elo weaker. What's 60" + 1", is that game in 1 minute with an extra second per move?Laskos wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:56 pmI don't know why you are so enthusiastic. Runs 20xxx and 30xxx are pretty pathetic, especially considering how much resources they have eaten up. Some folks there have overdone something. Just a quick check with the latest engine (rc4) and one of the latest nets:
TC: 60'' + 1''
So, run 30xxx is still ~150 Elo points below run 10xxx, and barely ~100 Elo points above 6x64 net 9155 (run 9xxx). Taking into account that the games with 6x64 net were 10-12 times faster and taking into account the hardware resources allocated, the whole run 9xxx could have been completed in less than a day. Lame runs, these newest ones. But I still hope that they will improve some 200 real Elo points over current level, although this is not granted at all.
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws SF8 120 68 60 66.7% 43.3% 1 lc0_v19_11261 0 111 20 50.0% 50.0% 2 lc0_v19_31214 -147 128 20 30.0% 40.0% 3 lc0_v19_9155 -241 127 20 20.0% 40.0% Finished match
sorry to be a pain, but what size is same size?
thanks. now I know this “good” version was with a large net.CMCanavessi wrote: ↑Tue Nov 20, 2018 12:13 am
main network site
1xxxx, 2xxxx, 3xxxx are all 20x256.