Sting SF 16

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Sting SF 16

Post by lech »

download:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/uns9igdwh ... 6.zip/file

Some very important changes.
I found next bugs in "Stockfish 2.1.1" and now I hope Sting should work in a stable way (without crashing).
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
Paloma
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:07 pm
Full name: Herbert L

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by Paloma »

Thanks Marek
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by lech »

This version starts with threads = 1 and Hash = 1024M. I hope it is not a problem.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
ChickenLogic
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:23 am
Full name: kek w

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by ChickenLogic »

That's great. I'd like to know more about what you changed.
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by Ovyron »

lech wrote: Sat Jul 27, 2019 2:16 pm This version starts with threads = 1 and Hash = 1024M. I hope it is not a problem.
Hash = 1024 is definitively a problem, I usually have many engines loaded to they're sent to the swap file.
Your beliefs create your reality, so be careful what you wish for.
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by lech »

ChickenLogic wrote: Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:19 pm That's great. I'd like to know more about what you changed.
There is nothing new to explain users.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by lech »

Ovyron wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:54 am
lech wrote: Sat Jul 27, 2019 2:16 pm This version starts with threads = 1 and Hash = 1024M. I hope it is not a problem.
Hash = 1024 is definitively a problem, I usually have many engines loaded to they're sent to the swap file.
Load Sting first and change hash to your liked value.
BTW. I recommend to use Sting with minimum 1024M hash.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by Ovyron »

lech wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:27 pmBTW. I recommend to use Sting with minimum 1024M hash.
Can you provide an example where this provides an improvement? I haven't been able to see any engine improving with more than 128MB hash, and even improvement from 64MB to 128MB was negligible. But perhaps Sting is different and it's an engine that benefits from giving it 8 times more hash than I do to others.
Your beliefs create your reality, so be careful what you wish for.
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by lech »

Ovyron wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:58 pm
lech wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:27 pmBTW. I recommend to use Sting with minimum 1024M hash.
Can you provide an example where this provides an improvement? I haven't been able to see any engine improving with more than 128MB hash, and even improvement from 64MB to 128MB was negligible. But perhaps Sting is different and it's an engine that benefits from giving it 8 times more hash than I do to others.
Of course, Sting gives a possibility to change the starting size of hash.
I recommend 1024M only to a deep analysis.
Seriously, if the big starting size of hash can be a problem, I will change it in the next version. :)
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: Sting SF 16

Post by Ovyron »

As long as I don't see any evidence of improvement from jumping from 128MB to 1GB RAM, I'll continue to use 128MB for all engines, this isn't specific to Sting.
lech wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:52 amSeriously, if the big starting size of hash can be a problem, I will change it in the next version. :)
Thanks, that would be great!
Your beliefs create your reality, so be careful what you wish for.