Look what Lc0 Bignet (which agrees most of the times with human openings and midgames) thinks of SF_dev (the last one) opening and midgame performance from the initial standard opening position in LTC 60 min + 15 seconds games side and reversed. RTX 2070 and 4 cores i7. The reverse game is not yet finished, but the opening and midgame are pretty much there, and I am going to bed. SF_dev after some time has to agree with the bad opinion of Lc0 about its play in opening and midgame.Laskos wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:22 pmYes, I maybe will do such a thing in 2 LTC games. Lc0 with "bignet", which seems to agree by far the most with the human opening theory against SF_dev from the standard opening position, side and reversed. I am curious how Lc0 "bignet" will evaluate SF_dev opening moves and quiet midgame moves.
First game: Lc0 Bignet White:
SF_dev was outplayed in the opening and midgame (and SF agrees too), and drew because Lc0 made a mistake in the endgame.
Second game: Lc0 Bignet Black (unfinished).
SF_dev was again outplayed in the opening and midgame (and SF agrees again), with unclear result.
I am curious. You are an experienced ICCF player, a GM if I am not wrong. You should know a lot about these things. Really, would you rely on Stockfish long back and forth analysis in the openings? Would you rely on Rybka 3? On Fritz 7? When you started to trust regular engines in the openings?