TalkChess.com

dkappe wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 12:12 pm

smatovic wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 11:58 am Ups, did the clone wars started again?

Some people should take some time to think about what the GPL philosophy stands
for, what was the intention of an programmer or an community if they put their
stuff under GPL, and - respect that.

--
Srdja

When you put your software under the GPL you are granting anyone who wants to use the software rights, including selling access to it as a SaaS offering. The GPL is not some magical commercial chastity belt.

dkappe wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:57 am

Werewolf wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:58 am Wasn’t he disqualified from something for basically just copying Lc0 and passing it off as his own work?

Did I just dream that up? I have a vague memory of that but might have got that wrong.

You dreamed that bit of libelous BS up. TCEC cooked up some seriously odd rules, though, to prevent third party nets from entering with the lc0 net container.

crem wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:59 am

dkappe wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:57 am
You dreamed that bit of libelous BS up. TCEC cooked up some seriously odd rules, though, to prevent third party nets from entering with the lc0 net container.

What is "Lc0 net container"?

"DeusX" was Lc0 binary, Lc0 neural network architecture and implementation, trained with Lc0 scripts (so the only thing different is NN weights, it's not even "different neural net" as some people say).
I don't know what "Fat Fritz" is, but I expect it's the same.

Whether it's fine to commercialize is debatable, but what I don't like the most is that what "Fat Fritz" really is is hidden from people paying money for it.

AdminX wrote: ↑Thu Aug 15, 2019 9:59 pm If the root binary is LC0, then I would rather use LC0.

Ovyron wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 1:12 pm The Rybka Cluster all over again...