Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderators: hgm , Rebel , chrisw
ChickenLogic
Posts: 154 Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:23 am
Full name: kek w
Post
by ChickenLogic » Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:55 am
cdani wrote: ↑ Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:34 pm
Quick test 30 + 0.2 of your net (stnnuecl1) against the previous best net known for me. Yours is a bit better:
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 stnnuecl1 : 2868.0 10.7 269.0 504 53.4%
2 stnnue : 2844.0 10.7 235.0 504 46.6%
Now testing it against the latest one of Additional Pylon halfkp 256.
Yeah, about that. I kinda have something to tell you.
You see, this Additional Pylon dude on discord (I hate him) is kinda the same person as me.
Raphexon
Posts: 476 Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:00 pm
Full name: Henk Drost
Post
by Raphexon » Fri Jun 19, 2020 10:13 am
ChickenLogic wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:55 am
cdani wrote: ↑ Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:34 pm
Quick test 30 + 0.2 of your net (stnnuecl1) against the previous best net known for me. Yours is a bit better:
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 stnnuecl1 : 2868.0 10.7 269.0 504 53.4%
2 stnnue : 2844.0 10.7 235.0 504 46.6%
Now testing it against the latest one of Additional Pylon halfkp 256.
Yeah, about that. I kinda have something to tell you.
You see, this Additional Pylon dude on discord (I hate him) is kinda the same person as me.
Trust no one, not even yourself.
cdani
Posts: 2204 Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra
Post
by cdani » Fri Jun 19, 2020 11:01 am
ChickenLogic wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:55 am
cdani wrote: ↑ Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:34 pm
Quick test 30 + 0.2 of your net (stnnuecl1) against the previous best net known for me. Yours is a bit better:
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 stnnuecl1 : 2868.0 10.7 269.0 504 53.4%
2 stnnue : 2844.0 10.7 235.0 504 46.6%
Now testing it against the latest one of Additional Pylon halfkp 256.
Yeah, about that. I kinda have something to tell you.
You see, this Additional Pylon dude on discord (I hate him) is kinda the same person as me.
!!!
cdani
Posts: 2204 Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra
Post
by cdani » Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:43 pm
I have done a longer time control test. 600 seconds (10 minutes) + 2 seconds against latest Stockfish dev. So maybe 80 elo less than Stockfish.
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2896.3 9.9 203.5 333 61.1%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2815.7 9.9 129.5 333 38.9%
Games:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aj8wlSmr_Hq3if4nhbX ... g?e=FDQtrt
Last edited by cdani on Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
lkaufman
Posts: 5960 Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Post
by lkaufman » Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:46 pm
cdani wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:43 pm
I have done a longer time control test. 600 seconds (10 minutes) + 2 seconds against latest Stockfish dev. So maybe 80 elo less than Stockfish.
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2896.3 9.9 203.5 333 61.1%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2815.7 9.9 129.5 333 38.9%
What value are you using for slowmover? My best result was with 70, with 60 close behind.
Komodo rules!
cdani
Posts: 2204 Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra
Post
by cdani » Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:48 pm
lkaufman wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:46 pm
What value are you using for slowmover? My best result was with 70, with 60 close behind.
Default one.
cdani
Posts: 2204 Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra
Post
by cdani » Fri Jun 19, 2020 9:50 pm
lkaufman wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:46 pm
cdani wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:43 pm
I have done a longer time control test. 600 seconds (10 minutes) + 2 seconds against latest Stockfish dev. So maybe 80 elo less than Stockfish.
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2896.3 9.9 203.5 333 61.1%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2815.7 9.9 129.5 333 38.9%
What value are you using for slowmover? My best result was with 70, with 60 close behind.
I'm repeating the test with Slow Mover 60. Tomorrow the results.
Jesse Gersenson
Posts: 593 Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:43 am
Post
by Jesse Gersenson » Sat Jun 20, 2020 8:33 am
Does this run in linux?
cdani
Posts: 2204 Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra
Post
by cdani » Sat Jun 20, 2020 10:10 am
cdani wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 9:50 pm
lkaufman wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:46 pm
cdani wrote: ↑ Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:43 pm
I have done a longer time control test. 600 seconds (10 minutes) + 2 seconds against latest Stockfish dev. So maybe 80 elo less than Stockfish.
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2896.3 9.9 203.5 333 61.1%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2815.7 9.9 129.5 333 38.9%
What value are you using for slowmover? My best result was with 70, with 60 close behind.
I'm repeating the test with Slow Mover 60. Tomorrow the results.
Here the results with Slow Mover 60:
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2886.2 9.8 220.0 377 58.4%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2825.8 9.8 157.0 377 41.6%
So as told is better, maybe 60 elo from Stockfish dev.
The games:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aj8wlSmr_Hq3if4rM1y ... w?e=0baeAp
cdani
Posts: 2204 Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra
Post
by cdani » Sun Jun 21, 2020 3:23 pm
I have done also a test in multithreading, 3 threads as the computers have 6 cores.
Somehow the short time control is very bad, but at long time control is ok:
Code: Select all
Stc 50 + 0.3 3 threads:
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2916.6 11.2 290.0 437 66.4%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2795.4 11.2 147.0 437 33.6%
Ltc 200+0.5 3 threads
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 st200617 : 2887.8 9.0 207.5 352 58.9%
2 stnnuecl1 : 2824.2 9.0 144.5 352 41.1%
Now I will test the newest nets of ChickenLogic vs the one of Gekkehenker.