Ah, I see, I knew I had seen it sometimes somewhere before.acase wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:00 am It comes from an old test position originally from John Dart That I modified from about 10 years ago, see here:
http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... on#p333988
Mate in 19
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: Mate in 19
Peter.
-
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:04 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain.
Re: Mate in 19.
Hello Ignacio:
No comments on Gustav, the solution time is enough.
Regards from Spain.
Ajedrecista.
Thank you very much! Just looking at the number of nodes and the speed I was getting, it would have taken around 18 or 20 hours in my PC, if not more, so totally unfeasible for me, who do not like overnight runs.Ignacio wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 9:33 pm Here is your mate in 10:
FEN: r5kr/pp2q1pp/2pp3B/3n2Q1/3P4/P4R2/6PP/5RK1 w - - 3 8
Chest 5.2:
FEN: r5kr/pp2q1pp/2pp3B/3n2Q1/3P4/P4R2/6PP/5RK1 w - - (9+11)
Position-Analysis: C0/R0/K1/P7/X32 W:8/41
Search for 1. Special-Mate [C0/R0/K2/P9/X42] in 126 ... (Hash=2044MB)
10 3:08:42 6.085.802.965 1.043.794 +M10 Dg5-g4
Search completed ... (Time=11321.96s)
Mate in 10 found ! (1. Solution in 3:08:41)
10/10 3:12:15 11.745.866.641 1.037.441 +M10 Dg5-g4 c6-c5 h2-h4 c5-c4 h4-h5 c4-c3 Ah6xg7 Cd5-e3 Tf3xe3 De7xe3+ Rg1-h1 De3-e8 Ag7-h6+ De8-g6 h5xg6 Ta8-e8 g6xh7+ Rg8xh7 Dg4-g7+
Gustav is better, 12 minutes.
Best.
No comments on Gustav, the solution time is enough.
Regards from Spain.
Ajedrecista.
-
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: Mate in 19.
Mate- field h7 was a mistake too, shorter mates of course can happen on other fields too.
Peter.