Page 1 of 10

Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:16 am
by Chessqueen

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:46 am
by DrCliche
Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes.

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:42 am
by Laskos
DrCliche wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:46 am Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes.
Just a different worldview and perceptions. I guess the priors of both of you have a similar mean but very different widths. Both of you expected SF NNUE to be stronger than SF Classic by a similar margin, say 124 Elo points, but with different emotional and mental attitude about your confidence in that.

I pictured the priors here:

Image

After these 3 TCEC draws, the posterior estimate of the difference between SF NNUE and SF Classic in his case dropped to 32 Elo points from a priori 124 Elo points, in your case dropped to 113 Elo points from the same 124 a priori Elo points. So he is legit in asking "Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?" and you are right in replying "Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes."

:twisted:

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:15 am
by peter
Laskos wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:42 am
DrCliche wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:46 am Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes.
Just a different worldview and perceptions. I guess the priors of both of you have a similar mean but very different widths. Both of you expected SF NNUE to be stronger than SF Classic by a similar margin, say 124 Elo points, but with different emotional and mental attitude about your confidence in that.

I pictured the priors here:

Image

After these 3 TCEC draws, the posterior estimate of the difference between SF NNUE and SF Classic in his case dropped to 32 Elo points from a priori 124 Elo points, in your case dropped to 113 Elo points from the same 124 a priori Elo points. So he is legit in asking "Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?" and you are right in replying "Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes."

:twisted:
:D
46 games right now in this division with 3 games won, so 43 draws.

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:14 pm
by Laskos
peter wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:15 am
Laskos wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:42 am
DrCliche wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:46 am Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes.
Just a different worldview and perceptions. I guess the priors of both of you have a similar mean but very different widths. Both of you expected SF NNUE to be stronger than SF Classic by a similar margin, say 124 Elo points, but with different emotional and mental attitude about your confidence in that.

I pictured the priors here:

Image

After these 3 TCEC draws, the posterior estimate of the difference between SF NNUE and SF Classic in his case dropped to 32 Elo points from a priori 124 Elo points, in your case dropped to 113 Elo points from the same 124 a priori Elo points. So he is legit in asking "Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?" and you are right in replying "Sure enough that three draws (lol) at TCEC shouldn't measurably change our extreme confidence, yes."

:twisted:
:D
46 games right now in this division with 3 games won, so 43 draws.
Where is Jeroen? His openings usually avoided this drawfest. With TCEC if one goes with the usual openings the draw rates between top engines are above 90%.

6 more draws of SF NNUE, and DrCliche will start to listen to Chessqueen :lol:

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:02 pm
by peter
Laskos wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:14 pm Where is Jeroen? His openings usually avoided this drawfest.
As far as I just read at TCEC-Rules, Premier Division is played
with a randomized 8-move opening book by Nelson Hernandez
Jeroen's openings will come at Superfinal.

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:03 pm
by Nay Lin Tun
It is already 6 games, 6 draws for SFNNUE! :mrgreen: :twisted:

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:10 pm
by peter
Nay Lin Tun wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:03 pm It is already 6 games, 6 draws for SFNNUE! :mrgreen: :twisted:
Yet only one less win than LC0, Stoofvlees (which has lost one game on the other hand too) and Ethereal have each. So no really clear superperformance over the 6 draws neither from any of the other engines.
:wink:

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:39 pm
by mwyoung
Chessqueen wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:16 am https://tcec-chess.com/live.html
Where have we seen results like this before?

Re: Are we sure that Stockfish NNUE is better than the Normal Stockfish ?

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:51 pm
by peter
mwyoung wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 1:39 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:16 am https://tcec-chess.com/live.html
Where have we seen results like this before?
In this one Bonus
StockfishNNUE 20200704-StockFiNN-0.2 vs Top4
of latest season

https://tcec-chess.com/#div=nnueg&game=1&season=18

from 56 games hefty 4 ones were won.