We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
gonzochess75
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:29 pm
Full name: Adam Treat

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by gonzochess75 » Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:28 am

connor_mcmonigle wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:20 am
In fact, the only testing that's inconsistent with the general consensus which has formed as to the FF2 network's strength (-5 to -20 elo to SF 13) is Albert's published testing on ChessBase. Why aren't you so vocally decrying Albert's testing as a scam?
Let's also remember that those tests had very little transparency in comparison to the official stockfish testing. The testing methodology SF used was the same standard that every proposed patch for SF is subjected to and the SF projects results speak for themselves.

noobpwnftw
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:10 pm

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by noobpwnftw » Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:36 am

gonzochess75 wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:28 am
Let's also remember that those tests had very little transparency in comparison to the official stockfish testing. The testing methodology SF used was the same standard that every proposed patch for SF is subjected to and the SF projects results speak for themselves.
Only this time it doesn't show what they like to see so it has to be a scam.

dkappe
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:52 pm
Full name: Dietrich Kappe

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by dkappe » Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:07 am

noobpwnftw wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:21 am
dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:11 am
Or are you just going to attack anyone who doesn’t agree with you?
You mean like what you do?
I don’t attack just anyone. I’m standing up to you and your bullying tactics.

noobpwnftw
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:10 pm

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by noobpwnftw » Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:25 am

dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:07 am
I don’t attack just anyone. I’m standing up to you and your bullying tactics.
I recognize your courage but I don't think it's fair for you, and this doesn't even count as bullying.

dkappe
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:52 pm
Full name: Dietrich Kappe

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by dkappe » Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:33 am

noobpwnftw wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:25 am
dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:07 am
I don’t attack just anyone. I’m standing up to you and your bullying tactics.
I recognize your courage but I don't think it's fair for you, and this doesn't even count as bullying.
Then talk to your buddy Andy. He does nothing but sh*t all over other peoples work.

the_real_greco
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2019 3:55 am
Full name: Andy!

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by the_real_greco » Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:47 am

Let's get this straight. He is Andrew. I am Greco.

AndrewGrant
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 4:08 am
Location: U.S.A
Full name: Andrew Grant
Contact:

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by AndrewGrant » Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:48 am

dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:33 am
noobpwnftw wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:25 am
dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:07 am
I don’t attack just anyone. I’m standing up to you and your bullying tactics.
I recognize your courage but I don't think it's fair for you, and this doesn't even count as bullying.
Then talk to your buddy Andy. He does nothing but sh*t all over other peoples work.
False! I shit on things that people pass off as their own work, but its not! I love people who do work. Great people. Best people.

RubiChess
Posts: 275
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:20 am
Full name: Andreas Matthies

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by RubiChess » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:20 am

dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:11 am
Typical fishtest scam.
The same "fishtest scam" that is the main tool for developing the best engine.
Dietrich, you are so lame. Again. I'm in the Stockfish corner.

User avatar
towforce
Posts: 10745
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Birmingham UK

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by towforce » Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:30 am

dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:01 am
towforce wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 pm
Does anyone understand what witch hunting has to do with the facts about FF2?
(and the lies in the beginning and the marketing scam, which goes down to pieces now slowly)
Probably he still believes in a witchhunt vs. Houdini too?

The sentence 'I am a tester not a judge' leaves some bitter aftertaste, it is quite analogue to a lot of horrible wrongdoings in mankind.
Which silly person wrote this? What tosh.

I'm not commenting on the quality of the writing, but to answer your question, if you follow the thread back by clicking on the up-arrow symbols, you'll see that it was written by Guenther.
Writing is the antidote to confusion

User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 3796
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon
Contact:

Re: We are the Computer Chess Community. We control ourselves.

Post by Guenther » Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:47 am

towforce wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:30 am
dkappe wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:01 am
towforce wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 pm
Does anyone understand what witch hunting has to do with the facts about FF2?
(and the lies in the beginning and the marketing scam, which goes down to pieces now slowly)
Probably he still believes in a witchhunt vs. Houdini too?

The sentence 'I am a tester not a judge' leaves some bitter aftertaste, it is quite analogue to a lot of horrible wrongdoings in mankind.
Which silly person wrote this? What tosh.

I'm not commenting on the quality of the writing, but to answer your question, if you follow the thread back by clicking on the up-arrow symbols, you'll see that it was written by Guenther.
...and meanwhile it's two levels away from the original context, which you had removed from the beginning.
http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 60#p884100
https://rwbc-chess.de
HGM@'chessqueen' 2018-present, aka: 'George' 2013-2016, 'pichy' 2006-2013, 'Jorge Pichard' 2000-2006 (old forum) wrote: http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 79#p789713

Post Reply