Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Chessqueen
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Chessqueen »

Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
Chessqueen
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Chessqueen »

Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:09 pm Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?
Result of games using intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz 128 Hashtable
Score of Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 vs igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0: 0 - 14 - 6 [0.150]
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing White: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing Black: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... White vs Black: 7 - 7 - 6 [0.500] 20
Elo difference: -301.3 +/- 161.0, LOS: 0.0 %, DrawRatio: 30.0 %
20 of 20 games finished.

This was the last game
[Event "My Tournament"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2021.04.10"]
[Round "10"]
[White "igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0"]
[Black "Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C55"]
[GameDuration "00:13:24"]
[GameEndTime "2021-04-10T12:28:52.443 Central Daylight Time"]
[GameStartTime "2021-04-10T12:15:27.972 Central Daylight Time"]
[Opening "Two knights defense (Modern Bishop's Opening)"]
[PlyCount "221"]
[TimeControl "300+1"]

1. e4 {+0.49/27 26s} e5 {-0.30/20 17s} 2. Nf3 {+0.53/27 22s} Nc6 {-0.33/18 6.8s}
3. Bc4 {+0.37/25 17s} Nf6 {-0.17/18 7.8s} 4. d3 {+0.42/26 19s}
Bc5 {-0.13/19 14s} 5. Nc3 {+0.38/24 18s} d6 {-0.11/18 7.2s}
6. Na4 {+0.42/25 13s} Bb6 {-0.23/18 6.2s} 7. O-O {+0.45/23 8.7s}
Na5 {-0.20/19 8.5s} 8. Bd5 {+0.34/24 7.7s} c6 {0.00/19 8.7s}
9. Nxb6 {+0.22/24 10s} axb6 {-0.20/18 7.5s} 10. Bxf7+ {+0.17/23 14s}
Kxf7 {+0.15/21 6.3s} 11. b4 {+0.01/23 8.6s} Re8 {-0.18/18 7.2s}
12. a4 {+0.20/22 13s} Kg8 {-0.01/18 6.0s} 13. bxa5 {+0.20/23 12s}
Rxa5 {-0.06/18 6.8s} 14. Be3 {0.00/23 7.5s} h6 {-0.01/18 5.3s}
15. c4 {0.00/22 9.6s} Bg4 {+0.06/20 12s} 16. h3 {+0.42/23 9.7s}
Bh5 {+0.01/19 7.0s} 17. Qb3 {+0.56/25 7.3s} Nd7 {+0.19/18 3.8s}
18. Nh2 {+0.52/24 4.5s} Kh7 {-0.22/21 12s} 19. Rfb1 {+0.60/23 6.0s}
Ra6 {-0.24/20 5.7s} 20. Nf1 {+0.39/21 5.5s} Nc5 {-0.19/18 4.1s}
21. Bxc5 {+0.86/21 3.3s} dxc5 {-0.20/19 5.4s} 22. Ra3 {+0.80/21 3.4s}
Bf7 {-0.51/21 14s} 23. Qc3 {+0.81/22 4.6s} Qc7 {-0.72/20 7.0s}
24. Nh2 {+0.74/21 6.6s} Be6 {-0.39/21 9.6s} 25. Nf3 {+0.58/23 6.2s}
Bc8 {-0.23/20 5.5s} 26. Rbb3 {+0.87/22 5.7s} Re6 {-0.23/23 6.9s}
27. Ra1 {+0.62/23 5.4s} Re8 {-0.23/22 3.0s} 28. Qb2 {+0.69/24 2.9s}
Kg8 {-0.23/22 4.9s} 29. Rb1 {+0.66/20 1.8s} Qd6 {-0.23/20 3.1s}
30. Qc3 {+0.76/21 3.0s} Qc7 {-0.23/22 5.4s} 31. R1b2 {+0.79/20 1.7s}
Kh7 {-0.23/22 4.9s} 32. Ne1 {+0.64/20 3.0s} Rxa4 {-0.05/23 10s}
33. Rxb6 {+0.78/21 2.4s} Rf8 {-0.21/20 3.0s} 34. Nf3 {+0.77/21 1.9s}
Qd8 {-0.16/20 5.9s} 35. Nxe5 {+0.14/23 4.2s} Qg5 {-0.11/22 13s}
36. Ng4 {+0.22/22 2.0s} h5 {+0.01/19 3.8s} 37. Ne3 {+0.31/23 3.8s}
h4 {-0.07/18 3.3s} 38. Qe1 {+0.66/20 3.6s} Ra3 {-0.57/19 6.6s}
39. Qd1 {+0.28/21 3.3s} Bxh3 {-0.28/19 3.4s} 40. Rxb7 {+0.33/20 2.5s}
Raa8 {-0.47/17 1.9s} 41. Kh1 {+0.08/19 2.0s} Bc8 {+0.01/16 2.0s}
42. R7b6 {+0.53/22 2.0s} Qe5 {-0.01/20 5.2s} 43. Qe2 {+0.58/21 2.2s}
Ra7 {-0.01/19 5.2s} 44. Rb1 {+0.84/21 1.8s} Raf7 {+0.01/19 3.9s}
45. Rf1 {+0.69/22 2.3s} Rf6 {-0.01/20 4.6s} 46. Rb2 {+0.55/22 2.5s}
Qg5 {+0.01/20 4.1s} 47. Ra2 {+0.87/20 1.8s} R6f7 {+0.01/20 3.5s}
48. f3 {+0.71/19 1.6s} h3 {+0.33/19 3.7s} 49. g4 {+0.31/21 2.4s}
g6 {+0.01/16 1.2s} 50. Raa1 {+0.85/20 2.3s} Qf4 {+0.01/20 5.7s}
51. Rf2 {+0.93/21 2.2s} Be6 {+0.13/19 3.0s} 52. Raf1 {+1.09/21 1.3s}
Bc8 {+0.01/21 8.0s} 53. Nd1 {+1.20/18 1.4s} Rd8 {+0.01/18 3.1s}
54. e5 {+2.23/18 0.99s} Re8 {-0.61/17 2.4s} 55. Re1 {+1.47/18 2.0s}
Qg3 {-0.99/19 5.7s} 56. Qe4 {+2.31/18 1.4s} h2 {-0.82/19 5.0s}
57. Qe3 {+2.90/19 2.3s} Kg7 {-0.60/17 2.1s} 58. Qe2 {+2.38/20 2.2s}
Kg8 {-0.30/18 4.1s} 59. Rff1 {+3.16/21 2.0s} Be6 {-1.82/18 3.5s}
60. Nc3 {+3.12/22 1.6s} Ref8 {-1.10/16 1.7s} 61. Ne4 {+3.23/20 2.3s}
Qxe5 {-0.98/15 0.81s} 62. Rf2 {+2.76/22 2.1s} Qf4 {-2.07/18 3.1s}
63. Ref1 {+3.50/19 2.1s} Bd7 {-2.07/16 0.96s} 64. Qb2 {+3.80/20 1.9s}
Rh7 {-2.58/18 2.3s} 65. Nxc5 {+3.69/19 1.1s} Bc8 {-2.51/17 1.00s}
66. Ne4 {+3.77/20 0.91s} Be6 {-2.64/17 1.0s} 67. Qc1 {+3.65/17 0.73s}
Qxc1 {-3.18/16 1.0s} 68. Rxc1 {+3.88/17 0.69s} Bc8 {-3.03/16 0.97s}
69. Ra1 {+4.15/16 0.51s} Rd7 {-4.14/16 1.0s} 70. Ra3 {+4.44/16 0.40s}
Rdf7 {-4.20/16 1.0s} 71. Ra8 {+4.49/17 0.56s} Bd7 {-4.44/16 1.0s}
72. Rxf8+ {+4.85/17 0.61s} Kxf8 {-4.90/18 1.00s} 73. Kxh2 {+4.93/17 1.4s}
Be8 {-4.94/17 1.0s} 74. Kg3 {+4.83/17 1.2s} Ra7 {-4.96/17 1.0s}
75. Re2 {+4.99/16 0.66s} Ra3 {-5.14/17 0.97s} 76. Nc5 {+5.05/16 0.68s}
Ra7 {-5.36/18 1.0s} 77. Re5 {+5.20/15 1.4s} Re7 {-5.04/17 1.0s}
78. f4 {+4.86/17 1.3s} Ra7 {-5.78/17 1.00s} 79. Kf3 {+4.99/16 0.74s}
Ra1 {-4.78/17 1.0s} 80. Kf2 {+5.10/16 1.1s} Kf7 {-4.97/18 0.96s}
81. Ke3 {+5.10/16 0.95s} Rf1 {-5.03/17 1.0s} 82. Re4 {+4.97/17 1.4s}
Rg1 {-4.56/17 0.90s} 83. Kf3 {+4.91/15 0.54s} Rf1+ {-4.53/17 1.0s}
84. Kg3 {+5.23/16 0.72s} Rh1 {-5.44/18 1.1s} 85. g5 {+5.23/15 1.4s}
Ra1 {-5.63/18 1.00s} 86. Kf3 {+4.93/19 1.2s} Rg1 {-5.42/17 1.0s}
87. Re2 {+5.11/16 0.75s} Rf1+ {-5.28/17 0.98s} 88. Ke3 {+5.07/18 0.94s}
Ke7 {-5.04/17 0.99s} 89. Ra2 {+5.10/17 1.3s} Kf8 {-6.47/17 1.0s}
90. Ke2 {+5.23/18 1.3s} Rh1 {-5.66/17 0.99s} 91. Ra7 {+5.18/18 0.51s}
Kg8 {-7.42/17 1.0s} 92. Re7 {+5.31/15 0.68s} Rh2+ {-7.54/17 0.98s}
93. Kf3 {+5.38/16 0.61s} Bf7 {-7.49/17 1.00s} 94. Nd7 {+6.18/20 0.86s}
c5 {-7.79/18 1.0s} 95. Ne5 {+7.60/18 0.78s} Rh7 {-8.92/17 1.0s}
96. Rxf7 {+11.10/21 1.4s} Rxf7 {-11.44/19 0.99s} 97. Nxf7 {+18.03/24 1.4s}
Kxf7 {-14.94/22 0.99s} 98. Ke3 {+241.61/26 1.4s} Ke7 {-9.68/21 1.0s}
99. d4 {+286.07/25 1.3s} cxd4+ {-19.48/20 0.99s} 100. Kxd4 {+321.47/24 1.3s}
Kd6 {-52.37/21 1.0s} 101. c5+ {+325.22/23 1.3s} Kc6 {-18.21/20 1.0s}
102. f5 {+M19/31 1.3s} Kc7 {-M20/24 1.0s} 103. fxg6 {+M17/28 0.61s}
Kd7 {-M16/28 0.76s} 104. g7 {+M15/29 0.57s} Ke6 {-M14/31 0.57s}
105. g8=Q+ {+M13/30 0.67s} Kf5 {-M12/37 0.73s} 106. g6 {+M11/34 0.60s}
Kf4 {-M10/35 1.3s} 107. Qf7+ {+M9/61 0.59s} Kg5 {-M8/57 0.48s}
108. g7 {+M7/92 0.56s} Kh6 {-M6/73 0.51s} 109. c6 {+M5/127 0.15s}
Kg5 {-M4/127 0.055s} 110. g8=Q+ {+M3/127 0.006s} Kh4 {-M2/127 0.022s}
111. Qfh7# {+M1/127 0.003s, White mates} 1-0
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 4605
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon

Re: Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Guenther »

Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:53 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:09 pm Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?
Result of games using intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz 128 Hashtable
Score of Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 vs igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0: 0 - 14 - 6 [0.150]
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing White: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing Black: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... White vs Black: 7 - 7 - 6 [0.500] 20
Elo difference: -301.3 +/- 161.0, LOS: 0.0 %, DrawRatio: 30.0 %
20 of 20 games finished.

This was the last game
...
[White "igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0"]
[Black "Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2"]
...
[TimeControl "300+1"]

1. e4 {+0.49/27 26s} e5 {-0.30/20 17s} 2. Nf3 {+0.53/27 22s} Nc6 {-0.33/18 6.8s}
Depth 20 in 17s, even on my slow old hardware Ethereal 12.75 would be on depth 23 already.
Your usual stupid setup, or may you even mixed up Ethereal with another program, or even both? Let the excuses roll in...chesstroll

This is the pichy we know since twenty years, he was born that way, lol

It doesn't ring the slightest bell in you that you have managed to get zero wins for Ethereal in around 50! games already,
when they should be around equal currently after the Igel 3.0 update?
https://rwbc-chess.de

trollwatch:
Chessqueen + chessica + AlexChess + Eduard + Sylwy
Chessqueen
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Chessqueen »

Guenther wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:51 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:53 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:09 pm Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?
Result of games using intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz 128 Hashtable
Score of Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 vs igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0: 0 - 14 - 6 [0.150]
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing White: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing Black: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... White vs Black: 7 - 7 - 6 [0.500] 20
Elo difference: -301.3 +/- 161.0, LOS: 0.0 %, DrawRatio: 30.0 %
20 of 20 games finished.

This was the last game
...
[White "igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0"]
[Black "Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2"]
...
[TimeControl "300+1"]

1. e4 {+0.49/27 26s} e5 {-0.30/20 17s} 2. Nf3 {+0.53/27 22s} Nc6 {-0.33/18 6.8s}
Depth 20 in 17s, even on my slow old hardware Ethereal 12.75 would be on depth 23 already.
Your usual stupid setup, or may you even mixed up Ethereal with another program, or even both? Let the excuses roll in...chesstroll
Most of your 1000th of test are done with opening book, correct? Have you ever done engines testing without opening books to determine how good certain engine can open up a particular opening without the help of Opening Book ? Therefore, you should know that in the very beginning of any chess game there are too many moves that any given engine has to consider without the help of an opening book. Why don't you use your old computer that you claim that is faster than my and test these two same engines without any opening and post the 2nd move of your old computer.

As the game progresses and the engine does not have to figure the very best response to the initial opening it will eventually calculate faster and faster.

66. Ne4 {+3.77/20 0.91s} Be6 {-2.64/17 1.0s Depth 17 in just 1.0s [/color][/b]
100. Kxd4 {+321.47/24 1.3s} Kd6 {-52.37/21 1.0s} Depth 24 in just 1.3s [/color][/b]

Now I am waiting your your 2nd move as you pointed out using your old computer which you claim much faster due to your smart setup :?:
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
Chessqueen
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Chessqueen »

Guenther wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:28 am
Chessqueen wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:09 am
Guenther wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:51 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:53 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:09 pm Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?

1. e4 {+0.49/27 26s} e5 {-0.30/20 17s} 2. Nf3 {+0.53/27 22s} Nc6 {-0.33/18 6.8s}
Depth 20 in 17s, even on my slow old hardware Ethereal 12.75 would be on depth 23 already.
Your usual stupid setup, or may you even mixed up Ethereal with another program, or even both? Let the excuses roll in...chesstroll
Most of your 1000th of test are done with opening book, correct? Have you ever done engines testing without opening books to determine how good certain engine can open up a particular opening without the help of Opening Book ? Therefore you should know that in the very beginning of any chess game there are too many options that any given engine has to consider without the help of an opening book. Why don't you use the old computer that you claim that is faster than my and test these two same engines without any opening and post the 2nd move of your old computer.

As the game progresses and the engine does not have to figure the very best response the the initial opening it will eventually calculate faster and faster.

66. Ne4 {+3.77/20 0.91s} Be6 {-2.64/17 1.0s Depth 17 in just 1.0s [/color][/b]
100. Kxd4 {+321.47/24 1.3s} Kd6 {-52.37/21 1.0s} Depth 24 in just 1.3s [/color][/b]

Now I am waiting your your 2nd move as you pointed out using your old computer which you claim much faster due to your smart setup :?:
Of course I did exactly this you pompous idiot, otherwise I wouldn't have posted chesstroll.
There are some people here, who know what they are doing unlike you.

Old Quadcore from 2009, not even popcount! Open your eyes pichy.

Code: Select all

uci
id name Ethereal 12.75
id author Andrew Grant, Alayan & Laldon
option name Hash type spin default 16 min 2 max 131072
option name Threads type spin default 1 min 1 max 2048
option name MultiPV type spin default 1 min 1 max 256
option name ContemptDrawPenalty type spin default 0 min -300 max 300
option name ContemptComplexity type spin default 0 min -100 max 100
option name MoveOverhead type spin default 100 min 0 max 10000
option name SyzygyPath type string default <empty>
option name SyzygyProbeDepth type spin default 0 min 0 max 127
option name Ponder type check default false
option name AnalysisMode type check default false
option name UCI_Chess960 type check default false
uciok
ucinewgame
isready
readyok
setoption Hash value 128
position startpos moves e2e4
go infinite
info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp -4 time 0 nodes 5 nps 5000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6
info depth 2 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 117 time 0 nodes 11 nps 11000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 a2a3 f6e4
info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 117 time 0 nodes 25 nps 25000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 a2a3 f6e4
info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 79 time 0 nodes 87 nps 87000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 f1d3 b8c6 a2a3
info depth 5 seldepth 5 multipv 1 score cp 23 time 0 nodes 427 nps 427000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 d1f3 e7e5 a2a3 a7a6
info depth 6 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 35 time 0 nodes 643 nps 643000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 d2d3 b8c6 a2a3
info depth 7 seldepth 7 multipv 1 score cp 34 time 0 nodes 2459 nps 2459000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv b8c6 b1c3 e7e5 b2b3 g8f6 g1f3
info depth 8 seldepth 11 multipv 1 score cp -33 time 15 nodes 8648 nps 540000 tbhits 0 hashfull 1 pv e7e5 g1f3 b8c6 f1c4 d8e7 c4d5 e7f6 b1c3
info depth 9 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp -39 time 15 nodes 14030 nps 876000 tbhits 0 hashfull 2 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 e7e6 f1c4 d8c7 e1g1 a7a6
info depth 10 seldepth 14 multipv 1 score cp -38 time 31 nodes 21708 nps 678000 tbhits 0 hashfull 4 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 d2d4 c5d4 f3d4 g8f6 b1c3 e7e6 d4c6 b7c6
info depth 11 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp -25 time 47 nodes 28545 nps 594000 tbhits 0 hashfull 6 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 e7e6 d2d4 c5d4 f3d4 f8c5 d4b5
info depth 12 seldepth 16 multipv 1 score cp -14 time 62 nodes 50055 nps 794000 tbhits 0 hashfull 11 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 g8f6 g2g3 d7d5 e4d5 f6d5 f1g2 e7e6 d2d4
info depth 13 seldepth 22 multipv 1 score cp -31 time 203 nodes 154198 nps 755000 tbhits 0 hashfull 25 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6g4 d1e2 f7f6 e5e6 d7e6 e2c4 e6e5 c3e4 e7e6 h2h3 g4h6 e4c5
info depth 14 seldepth 18 multipv 1 score cp -21 time 234 nodes 178781 nps 760000 tbhits 0 hashfull 26 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6g4 d1e2 f7f6 e5f6 g7f6 e2e4 d7d6 h2h3 g4e5
info depth 15 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -38 time 749 nodes 569426 nps 759000 tbhits 0 hashfull 90 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 g7g6 g2g3 d7d6 h2h3 f8g7 f1g2 d4c6 e1g1 g8f6 c1e3 e8g8 d3d4
info depth 16 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -27 time 842 nodes 645725 nps 765000 tbhits 0 hashfull 103 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 g7g6 g2g3 d7d6 h2h3 f8g7 f1g2 g8f6 e1g1 e8g8 c1g5 d4c6 g5e3 c8d7
info depth 17 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -26 time 1185 nodes 890491 nps 750000 tbhits 0 hashfull 143 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 d7d6 f3d4 c5d4 c3e2 e7e5 c2c3 d6d5 f2f4 d4c3 e2c3 d5d4 c3d5 d8a5 d1d2
.
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
Chessqueen
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Chessqueen »

Analyzing and asking the computer to go infinite is NOT the same as letting Igel play versus Ethereal and after Igel select the 1st move 1.e4 to see in how many seconds Ethereal will reach 20 depth :roll:

Ethereal 12.75 (PEXT):
6/4 00:00 3k 2,917k +0.24 Nf6 Qf3 g6 a3
7/10 00:00 16k 16,370k -0.44 Nc6 d4 d5 Nc3 e6 Nf3 dxe4 Nxe4
8/8 00:00 38k 38,415k -0.45 c6 Nc3 d5 d4 Nf6 e5
9/8 00:00 57k 57,115k -0.32 d5 exd5 c6 Nf3 cxd5 c3 Nf6 d4
10/9 00:00 97k 97,398k -0.17 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Nc3
11/14 00:00 130k 8,099k -0.23 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Bc4 Nc6 0-0 Bg7 Bg5 Kf8
12/19 00:00 507k 10,790k -0.35 d5 exd5 c6 d4 cxd5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bd6 0-0 Nf6
13/18 00:00 969k 10,309k -0.51 d5 exd5 c6 d4 cxd5 Bd3 Nf6 c3 g6 Nf3 e6 0-0 Bg7 h3
14/22 00:00 1,659k 9,643k -0.41 d5 exd5 c6 d4 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Nf3 Bg4 0-0 e6 Re1 Bd6 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3
15/18 00:00 2,519k 10,035k -0.23 c5 Nf3 e6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 b6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Be3 Nf6 Nxc6 dxc6
16/27 00:00 4,355k 9,591k -0.36 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Be3 d6 f3 Bd7 Bc4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 0-0 0-0 Kh1 Qc7
17/23 00:00 5,169k 9,449k -0.21 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Be3 d6 Be2 Bd7 0-0 Nf6 f3 0-0 Bc4 Qb6 Bb3 Nxd4 Bxd4
18/26 00:01 14,824k 9,207k -0.21 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Qc2 Qc7 h3 e6 Be2 Nc6 Na3 a6 0-0 b5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4
19/26 00:02 18,234k 9,112k -0.15 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Qc2 Qc7 h3 e6 Be2 Be7 0-0 Bd7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 0-0 Nf3 h6 Nbd2 d5
20/32- 00:02 26,481k 9,062k -0.25
20/40 00:03 31,848k 9,017k -0.23 c5 Nf3 d6 Bb5+ Bd7 Bxd7+ Qxd7 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 0-0 g6 h3 Nc6 Qd3 Bg7 Nc3 0-0 Rd1 Rac8 a3 Qd8 Nd5 Nxd5
21/33 00:04 38,195k 8,984k -0.27 c5 Nf3 d6 Bb5+ Bd7 Bxd7+ Qxd7 0-0 Nf6 d3 e6 c4 Be7 Nc3 Nc6 Be3 0-0 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 a3
22/34+ 00:04 40,774k 8,967k -0.17 c5
22/32 00:04 41,851k 8,957k -0.17 c5 Nf3 d6 Bb5+ Bd7 Bxd7+ Qxd7 0-0 Nc6 c3 d5 d3 dxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Rxd1 h6 a4 Nf6 e5 Ne4 e6 Rd8 exf7+ Kxf7
23/37- 00:06 53,889k 8,911k -0.27
23/34+ 00:07 63,836k 8,861k -0.17 c5
23/38 00:08 76,378k 8,822k -0.26 c5 Nf3 d6 Bb5+ Bd7 Bxd7+ Nxd7 0-0 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3 a6 d3 e6 Be3 Ne7 d4 0-0 d5 Ne5 Qe2 Nxf3+ Qxf3 exd5 Nxd5 Bxb2
24/37 00:09 83,482k 8,801k -0.20 c5 Nf3 d6 Bb5+ Nc6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 Be7 d3 Nf6 0-0 0-0 Re1 Be6 Bd2 a6 a4 Qc8 h3 h6 a5 Qd7 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 Nb4 Bxb4
25/40+ 00:13 118,213k 8,715k -0.10 c5
25/37 00:17 176,409k 8,644k -0.05 c5 Nf3 e6 Nc3 a6 g3 b5 Bg2 Bb7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 0-0 b4 Na4 Bxe4 Bxe4 Nxe4 Re1 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Qf3 hxg5 Qxa8 Ng4 Qe4 Nxh2
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
Chessqueen
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Ribichess Vs Igel Next

Post by Chessqueen »

Guenther wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:28 am
Chessqueen wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:09 am
Guenther wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:51 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:53 pm
Chessqueen wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:09 pm Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?
Result of games using intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz 128 Hashtable
Score of Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 vs igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0: 0 - 14 - 6 [0.150]
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing White: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2 playing Black: 0 - 7 - 3 [0.150] 10
... White vs Black: 7 - 7 - 6 [0.500] 20
Elo difference: -301.3 +/- 161.0, LOS: 0.0 %, DrawRatio: 30.0 %
20 of 20 games finished.

This was the last game
...
[White "igel-x64_bmi2_avx2_3_0_0"]
[Black "Ethereal12.75-x64-popcnt-avx2"]
...
[TimeControl "300+1"]

1. e4 {+0.49/27 26s} e5 {-0.30/20 17s} 2. Nf3 {+0.53/27 22s} Nc6 {-0.33/18 6.8s}
Depth 20 in 17s, even on my slow old hardware Ethereal 12.75 would be on depth 23 already.
Your usual stupid setup, or may you even mixed up Ethereal with another program, or even both? Let the excuses roll in...chesstroll
Most of your 1000th of test are done with opening book, correct? Have you ever done engines testing without opening books to determine how good certain engine can open up a particular opening without the help of Opening Book ? Therefore you should know that in the very beginning of any chess game there are too many options that any given engine has to consider without the help of an opening book. Why don't you use the old computer that you claim that is faster than my and test these two same engines without any opening and post the 2nd move of your old computer.

As the game progresses and the engine does not have to figure the very best response the the initial opening it will eventually calculate faster and faster.

66. Ne4 {+3.77/20 0.91s} Be6 {-2.64/17 1.0s Depth 17 in just 1.0s [/color][/b]
100. Kxd4 {+321.47/24 1.3s} Kd6 {-52.37/21 1.0s} Depth 24 in just 1.3s [/color][/b]

Now I am waiting your your 2nd move as you pointed out using your old computer which you claim much faster due to your smart setup :?:
Of course I did exactly this you pompous idiot, otherwise I wouldn't have posted chesstroll.
There are some people here, who know what they are doing unlike you.

Old Quadcore from 2009, not even popcount! Open your eyes pichy.

Code: Select all

uci
id name Ethereal 12.75
id author Andrew Grant, Alayan & Laldon
option name Hash type spin default 16 min 2 max 131072
option name Threads type spin default 1 min 1 max 2048
option name MultiPV type spin default 1 min 1 max 256
option name ContemptDrawPenalty type spin default 0 min -300 max 300
option name ContemptComplexity type spin default 0 min -100 max 100
option name MoveOverhead type spin default 100 min 0 max 10000
option name SyzygyPath type string default <empty>
option name SyzygyProbeDepth type spin default 0 min 0 max 127
option name Ponder type check default false
option name AnalysisMode type check default false
option name UCI_Chess960 type check default false
uciok
ucinewgame
isready
readyok
setoption Hash value 128
position startpos moves e2e4
go infinite
info depth 1 seldepth 1 multipv 1 score cp -4 time 0 nodes 5 nps 5000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6
info depth 2 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 117 time 0 nodes 11 nps 11000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 a2a3 f6e4
info depth 3 seldepth 3 multipv 1 score cp 117 time 0 nodes 25 nps 25000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 a2a3 f6e4
info depth 4 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 79 time 0 nodes 87 nps 87000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 f1d3 b8c6 a2a3
info depth 5 seldepth 5 multipv 1 score cp 23 time 0 nodes 427 nps 427000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 d1f3 e7e5 a2a3 a7a6
info depth 6 seldepth 4 multipv 1 score cp 35 time 0 nodes 643 nps 643000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv g8f6 d2d3 b8c6 a2a3
info depth 7 seldepth 7 multipv 1 score cp 34 time 0 nodes 2459 nps 2459000 tbhits 0 hashfull 0 pv b8c6 b1c3 e7e5 b2b3 g8f6 g1f3
info depth 8 seldepth 11 multipv 1 score cp -33 time 15 nodes 8648 nps 540000 tbhits 0 hashfull 1 pv e7e5 g1f3 b8c6 f1c4 d8e7 c4d5 e7f6 b1c3
info depth 9 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp -39 time 15 nodes 14030 nps 876000 tbhits 0 hashfull 2 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 e7e6 f1c4 d8c7 e1g1 a7a6
info depth 10 seldepth 14 multipv 1 score cp -38 time 31 nodes 21708 nps 678000 tbhits 0 hashfull 4 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 d2d4 c5d4 f3d4 g8f6 b1c3 e7e6 d4c6 b7c6
info depth 11 seldepth 12 multipv 1 score cp -25 time 47 nodes 28545 nps 594000 tbhits 0 hashfull 6 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 e7e6 d2d4 c5d4 f3d4 f8c5 d4b5
info depth 12 seldepth 16 multipv 1 score cp -14 time 62 nodes 50055 nps 794000 tbhits 0 hashfull 11 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 g8f6 g2g3 d7d5 e4d5 f6d5 f1g2 e7e6 d2d4
info depth 13 seldepth 22 multipv 1 score cp -31 time 203 nodes 154198 nps 755000 tbhits 0 hashfull 25 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6g4 d1e2 f7f6 e5e6 d7e6 e2c4 e6e5 c3e4 e7e6 h2h3 g4h6 e4c5
info depth 14 seldepth 18 multipv 1 score cp -21 time 234 nodes 178781 nps 760000 tbhits 0 hashfull 26 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6g4 d1e2 f7f6 e5f6 g7f6 e2e4 d7d6 h2h3 g4e5
info depth 15 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -38 time 749 nodes 569426 nps 759000 tbhits 0 hashfull 90 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 g7g6 g2g3 d7d6 h2h3 f8g7 f1g2 d4c6 e1g1 g8f6 c1e3 e8g8 d3d4
info depth 16 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -27 time 842 nodes 645725 nps 765000 tbhits 0 hashfull 103 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 g7g6 g2g3 d7d6 h2h3 f8g7 f1g2 g8f6 e1g1 e8g8 c1g5 d4c6 g5e3 c8d7
info depth 17 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -26 time 1185 nodes 890491 nps 750000 tbhits 0 hashfull 143 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 d7d6 f3d4 c5d4 c3e2 e7e5 c2c3 d6d5 f2f4 d4c3 e2c3 d5d4 c3d5 d8a5 d1d2
info depth 18 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -35 time 1638 nodes 1218876 nps 743000 tbhits 0 hashfull 206 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 d2d3 g7g6 f3d4 c5d4 c3e2 f8g7 c2c3 d4c3 e2c3 d7d5 c3d5 e7e6 d5e3 g8e7 d1b3 e7c6 c1d2
...
info depth 19 seldepth 27 multipv 1 score cp -40 time 2730 nodes 2028613 nps 742000 tbhits 0 hashfull 338 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 b1c3 c6d4 g2g3 d7d6 f1g2 g7g6 d2d3 c8g4 h2h3 g4f3 g2f3 b7b5 c1e3 b5b4 e3d4 c5d4
info depth 20 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 20 seldepth 28 multipv 1 score cp -30 lowerbound time 3401 nodes 2519875 nps 740000 tbhits 0 hashfull 415 pv c7c5
info depth 20 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 20 seldepth 26 multipv 1 score cp -20 lowerbound time 3697 nodes 2750598 nps 743000 tbhits 0 hashfull 448 pv c7c5
...
info depth 20 seldepth 26 multipv 1 score cp -35 time 3993 nodes 2938620 nps 735000 tbhits 0 hashfull 468 pv c7c5 g1f3 e7e6 b1c3 a7a6 g2g3 b7b5 f1g2 c8b7 e1g1 b5b4 c3a4 b7e4 d2d3 e4b7 c1e3 d8c7 d3d4 c5d4 f3d4
info depth 21 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 21 seldepth 28 multipv 1 score cp -25 lowerbound time 4383 nodes 3230857 nps 736000 tbhits 0 hashfull 510 pv c7c5
...
info depth 21 seldepth 30 multipv 1 score cp -27 time 4883 nodes 3583490 nps 733000 tbhits 0 hashfull 553 pv c7c5 g1f3 e7e6 b1c3 a7a6 d2d4 c5d4 d1d4 b8c6 d4d3 g8f6 c1f4 d7d5 e4d5 c6b4 d3e2 b4d5 c3d5 f6d5 e1c1 c8d7 g2g3
...
info depth 22 seldepth 34 multipv 1 score cp -37 upperbound time 9095 nodes 6670660 nps 733000 tbhits 0 hashfull 825 pv
info depth 22 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 22 seldepth 32 multipv 1 score cp -27 lowerbound time 9766 nodes 7165048 nps 733000 tbhits 0 hashfull 854 pv c7c5
...
info depth 22 seldepth 30 multipv 1 score cp -34 time 11606 nodes 8496376 nps 732000 tbhits 0 hashfull 905 pv c7c5 g1f3 e7e6 c2c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6d5 f1c4 d5b6 c4b3 b8c6 d2d4 d7d5 e1g1 f8e7 b3c2 c8d7 h2h3 b6c4 c2d3 e8g8 f1e1 c5d4 c3d4
info depth 23 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 23 seldepth 31 multipv 1 score cp -24 lowerbound time 12386 nodes 9064172 nps 731000 tbhits 0 hashfull 922 pv c7c5
...
info depth 23 seldepth 34 multipv 1 score cp -23 time 14056 nodes 10296579 nps 732000 tbhits 0 hashfull 950 pv c7c5 g1f3 e7e6 c2c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6d5 f1c4 d7d6 d2d4 c5d4 c3d4 d6e5 d4e5 f8b4 c1d2 b8c6 d2b4 c6b4 b1c3 e8g8 e1g1 h7h6 c3d5 e6d5
info depth 24 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 24 seldepth 40 multipv 1 score cp -13 lowerbound time 18814 nodes 13744946 nps 730000 tbhits 0 hashfull 984 pv c7c5
...
info depth 24 seldepth 35 multipv 1 score cp -22 time 22043 nodes 16118103 nps 731000 tbhits 0 hashfull 993 pv c7c5 g1f3 b8c6 c2c3 g8f6 e4e5 f6d5 d2d4 c5d4 f1c4 d5b6 c4b3 d7d5 e5d6 c8f5 c3d4 e7e6 e1g1 d8d6 b1c3 a8d8 c1e3 f8e7 d4d5 b6d5 c3d5 e6d5
info depth 25 currmove c7c5 currmovenumber 1
info depth 25 seldepth 38 multipv 1 score cp -12 lowerbound time 25241 nodes 18454710 nps 731000 tbhits 0 hashfull 996 pv c7c5


WOW your OLD computer is faster than my everybody can see that, N O W ,but my slow computer can also solve this problem too, and by the way, everybody here notice that you are the one trolling me :oops: :roll: :mrgreen:

[d]r4rk1/1bpqbppp/p1n5/1p1np3/8/1B1P1N1P/PPPN1PP1/R1BQR1K1 w - - 2 12

Stockfish 13:
6/6 00:00 6k 2,972k +0.68 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 a5 Re1 a4
7/7 00:00 8k 4,205k +0.19 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Ne4
8/11 00:00 11k 3,537k +1.08 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 a5 a4
9/9 00:00 12k 3,954k +1.30 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nb6 Re1 Rae8
10/14 00:00 25k 4,976k +1.43 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bf6 Re1 Rfe8 Rxe8+ Qxe8 Ne4
11/15 00:00 105k 5,516k +0.54 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Qg4 Qxg4 hxg4 Bf6 Rc5 Ne2+ Kf1 Nxc1 Rxc1 Bxb2 Rb1
12/20 00:00 145k 5,563k +0.73 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Nxh3+ gxh3 Qxh3 Bd5 Bxd5 Rxd5
13/19 00:00 239k 5,982k +0.56 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 Rad8 c3 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Bxf3 Qxd7 Rxd7 gxf3
14/21 00:00 373k 6,107k +0.62 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 Rad8 c3 c5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Qf5
15/27 00:00 561k 6,375k +0.50 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 c5 c3 Rad8 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Bb4 Rf1 Rfe8 Bg5 Be7 Re1
16/26 00:00 611k 6,368k +0.44 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 c5 a4 Rad8 Be3 Qc7 axb5 axb5 Qe2 Bf6 c3 Rfe8
17/26 00:00 773k 6,440k +0.61 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 c5 a4 Rad8 Be3 h6 c3 Qxd3 Qxd3 Rxd3 Bc2 Rdd8 Bxg6 fxg6 Ne5 Bd6 Nxg6 Rfe8
18/31 00:00 1,109k 6,602k +0.47 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 c5 a4 Rad8 Be3 Qc6 c3 Bf6 d4 Rfe8 axb5 axb5 d5 Qc7
19/29 00:00 1,149k 6,564k +0.50 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 c5 c3 Rad8 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Bxf3 Qxd7 Rxd7 gxf3 Nh4 Rd1 Nxf3+ Kf1 Rxd1+ Bxd1 Ne5 Be2 Rd8 Be3 Nc4
20/34 00:00 1,398k 6,628k +0.75 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Ng6 Re1 c5 c3 Rad8 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Bxf3 Qxd7 Rxd7 gxf3 Nh4 Kf1 Nxf3 Re3 Nh4 Re6 Bd6 Re4 Nf5
21/33 00:00 4,261k 6,839k +0.62 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Nf4 Nf3 Nxh3+ gxh3 c5 Bf4 c4 dxc4 Qxh3 Bg3 Bd6 Qf1 Qxf1+ Rxf1 Bxf3 Re3 Bxg3 fxg3 Bc6 c5 Ra7 c3 Rd7 Re2 Rfd8 Rfe1 Rd2 Rxd2
22/35 00:02 14,871k 6,778k +0.09 Ne4 Kh8 d4 exd4 c3 Rae8 cxd4 Nf6 Nc5 Bxc5 dxc5 Qxd1 Rxd1 Na5 Bc2 Bxf3 gxf3 Nc6 Be3 a5 Bf5
23/28 00:02 18,702k 6,766k +0.13 Ne4 Kh8 Nfg5 f6 c4 fxg5 cxd5 Nd4 Bxg5 Bd6 Be3 Nxb3 Qxb3 Qf7 a4 Bxd5 Qc3 Kg8 Rac1 Rae8 Nxd6 cxd6 axb5
24/26+ 00:03 21,761k 6,754k +0.29 a4
24/29- 00:03 22,204k 6,751k +0.05 a4 Nf4
24/32 00:03 26,054k 6,755k 0.00 a4 Nf4 Ne4 Ng6 axb5 axb5 Rxa8 Bxa8 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Be3 Qc6 Ng3 Qd7 Bc1
25/9+ 00:03 26,218k 6,752k +0.08 a4
25/33+ 00:03 26,481k 6,748k +0.16 a4
25/33 00:03 26,544k 6,746k +0.08 a4 Nf4 Ne4 Ng6 axb5 axb5 Rxa8 Bxa8 Ng3 h6 c3 Rd8 Bc2 b4 Bd2 Bb7 Qe2 Qd5 Nf5 bxc3 bxc3 Bf8 Qe4 Qxe4 Rxe4 Nce7 Nxe7+ Bxe7 Ra4
26/30- 00:04 29,997k 6,744k 0.00 a4 Nf4
26/35+ 00:04 31,053k 6,740k +0.08 a4
26/35 00:04 32,486k 6,737k +0.05 a4 Nf4 Ne4 Ng6 c3 h6 Be3 Rfd8 axb5 axb5 Bc2 b4 Rxa8 Bxa8 Ng3 bxc3 bxc3 Bb7 Ne4 Ba6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Nb4 Bb1 Bb7 Ng3 Bd5 Bxg6 fxg6
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll: