TalkChess.com

Posted: **Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:01 pm**

Richard Allbert wrote:Hi Tony,

Thanks for using Lime in these tests. It's nice to it is proving useful - even if taking a beating!

Richard

Did you know that Lime play better against stronger opponents such as Zappa, Francesca, and Arasan? May be Romi got some Anti-Lime algorithm, I am still waiting for Lime 6.4.

Posted: **Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:03 am**

Rubinus wrote:
Michael Sherwin wrote:Hey Tony,
Thanks for the test! It's looking like the next beta might break your 2500 barrier! If everything works out smoothly then you should have it in a couple of weeks, if not sooner.
Mike
Send me new Romichess, please.
My last version P3j. 64 bit variants not work (XP64, Athlon64 3200+).
Hi Pavel

Hi Pavel,

Please email me, mjsherwin_at_netzero_dot_com, and I will send to you the latest beta when it is ready. The one that I am working on now looks like it will take another nice ELO jump so there is not much point in getting an earlier one. It will be ready in a week or two. OTOH if you want an earlier beta, I will certainly send it to you.

Mike

Posted: **Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:30 am**

Suicide tournament is finished, Romi only scored 36/120, not enough points to get anything above the last place. If she had scored another 2.5 points, she could have made it to one spot above, so she isnt that far away from breaking in to that group. However, to get to the middle of the group, she still needs more than 100 points.

Posted: **Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:06 am**

I didnt post the data earlier because I wasnt at my house. Here they are anyway. Start rating is 2500. Funny thing you should note is that Romi wasnt able to get any points against a previous version of Arasan. Also note that Romi played against some outdated versions, so it could have been worse.

Code: Select all

47 RomiChessDK5              &#58; 2366  120 (+ 25,= 22,- 73&#41;, 30.0 %

Amyan 1.597                   &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %
Alaric 061011                 &#58;   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1&#41;, 62.5 %
Colossus2006f                 &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %
Arasan 9.4                    &#58;   4 (+  0,=  0,-  4&#41;,  0.0 %
Comet_B68                     &#58;   4 (+  2,=  0,-  2&#41;, 50.0 %
Green Light Chess 3.01.2.2    &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Patzer 3.80                   &#58;   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1&#41;, 62.5 %
Nejmet_307                    &#58;   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1&#41;, 62.5 %
Trace 1.36 NC3                &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %
Crafty Cito 2.0               &#58;   4 (+  0,=  1,-  3&#41;, 12.5 %
Quark 2.35                    &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Zarkov 4.89                   &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
E.T.Chess 18.10.05            &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
AnMon 5.60                    &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Petir 3.99d                   &#58;   4 (+  0,=  0,-  4&#41;,  0.0 %
Yace.099.56                   &#58;   4 (+  0,=  1,-  3&#41;, 12.5 %
Pepit 1.59                    &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %
Zappa 1.1                     &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Ufim 8.02                     &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %
Frenzee 3.0                   &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Tao 5.6 Blitz Specialist      &#58;   4 (+  0,=  3,-  1&#41;, 37.5 %
WildCat 6.0                   &#58;   4 (+  0,=  0,-  4&#41;,  0.0 %
Pseudo07c                     &#58;   4 (+  1,=  2,-  1&#41;, 50.0 %
Chiron v0.8.1b10.3            &#58;   4 (+  0,=  2,-  2&#41;, 25.0 %
Fruity xxx                     &#58;   4 (+  0,=  1,-  3&#41;, 12.5 %
Bright 0.1                    &#58;   4 (+  0,=  2,-  2&#41;, 25.0 %
Crafty 21.5 MB                &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Booot 4.13.0                  &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %
Movei00_8_403                 &#58;   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3&#41;, 25.0 %
Baron 1.8.1                   &#58;   4 (+  1,=  1,-  2&#41;, 37.5 %

Posted: **Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:21 pm**

I was expecting worse! The fact that only three engines from this group blanked Romi is interesting.

Posted: **Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:55 pm**

Michael Sherwin wrote:I was expecting worse! The fact that only three engines from this group blanked Romi is interesting.

You dont want me to test it against premier engines, do you?

Posted: **Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:02 pm**

Tony Thomas wrote:
Michael Sherwin wrote:I was expecting worse! The fact that only three engines from this group blanked Romi is interesting.
You dont want me to test it against premier engines, do you?

Don't get that evil Tony or michael will turn hid chick against you

Posted: **Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:45 am**

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:
Michael Sherwin wrote:I was expecting worse! The fact that only three engines from this group blanked Romi is interesting.
You dont want me to test it against premier engines, do you?
Don't get that evil Tony or michael will turn hid chick against you

Evil, what? Neither wont turn their hoe against me.

If I were to test it against Premier engines, I expect a score of 10-15%.

Posted: **Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:21 am**

Match results of a newer version is coming soon your way...Wait till I get home.

Posted: **Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:16 pm**

Tony Thomas wrote:Match results of a newer version is coming soon your way...Wait till I get home.

TalkChess.com

A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination

Re: A dangerous combination