Page 1 of 1

The Wrath Of Zeus- Round 36: It's Over w/ A Tiebreak Winner!

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:27 am
by geots
THE WRATH OF ZEUS

Intel Pentium 4
Single Processor- 2.8ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man tablebases
Ponder & Learning = OFF
Perfect 9.ctg book for all (with 12 move CCRL limit)
40 moves in 62 minutes repeating (adapted to CCRL 40/40)
RR = 4 cycles
All engines = 32 bit



Round 36

Zeus 1.29 v Homer 2.0 draw
Hamsters 0.0.6 v KnightX 1.92 (1-0)
Deuterium 06.08.25.04 v LittleThought 1.00 draw
BugChess2 1.4.1 v Popochin 2.9 draw
Arion 1.7 v Sage 2.2a (1-0)


Standings after Round 36

22.5- Homer 2.0 383.00
22.5- Sage 2.2a 379.75
20.5- Arion 1.7
19.5- Zeus 1.29
19.5- LittleThought 1.00
19.0- BugChess2 1.4.1
18.5- Popochin 2.9
15.5- KnightX 1.92
15.0- Deuterium 06.08.25.04
7.5- Hamsters 0.0.6


Homer wins this tournament via a very close tiebreak! Thanks to all the authors who made this tournament possible.


Games available for download after each round from:
http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/discussio ... php?t=1767

Re: The Wrath Of Zeus- Round 36: It's Over w/ A Tiebreak Win

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:57 am
by nthom
Thanks for the tourney!

Re: The Wrath Of Zeus- Round 36: It's Over w/ A Tiebreak Win

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:30 am
by geots
nthom wrote:Thanks for the tourney!


It was my pleasure, Nathan. I thoroughly enjoyed running it. Actually i believe the top 6 or 7 finishers really had just as good a chance as any to win it. You may want to consider changing the name from Little Thought to
"Lots Of" Thought. I was impressed with its play.

Best to you

Re: The Wrath Of Zeus- Round 36: It's Over w/ A Tiebreak Win

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:26 pm
by Tony Thomas
Nice victory by Homer, I wish you had used the newer version of Hamsters as well.

Re: The Wrath Of Zeus- Round 36: It's Over w/ A Tiebreak Win

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:36 am
by geots
Tony Thomas wrote:Nice victory by Homer, I wish you had used the newer version of Hamsters as well.

I would have if it had not been so late into the tournament. And the author advised me at that point just to stay with his 0.0.6. Looking forward, however, to getting a chance to run the newer version/versions.

Regards