Latest update here
Rybka 2.3.2 beta2 results after 305 games
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.live/
Shaun
CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:55 pm
- Location: Brighton - UK
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
Is it really appropriate to have a beta at the top of a rating list? I wish more games would be given to some engines that are released and in need of further testing.Shaun wrote:Latest update here
Rybka 2.3.2 beta2 results after 305 games
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.live/
Shaun
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A surprising new number one
Funnily enough, Glaurung 2-epsilon/4 is the first engine to break the 3100 barrier, with a 66.4% LOS over Rybka! Congratulations to Tord Romstad for this marvelous feat!
Some could talk about 6 games being too few, but hey, 66.4% is still much better than any other engine has ever (since Rybka's appearance) had in a published rating list.
Some could talk about 6 games being too few, but hey, 66.4% is still much better than any other engine has ever (since Rybka's appearance) had in a published rating list.
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
I think it's OK for blitz. Long time control testing where CPU time is at a premium is a different storyHarvey Williamson wrote: Is it really appropriate to have a beta at the top of a rating list? I wish more games would be given to some engines that are released and in need of further testing.
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
Hi Ray,Spock wrote:I think it's OK for blitz. Long time control testing where CPU time is at a premium is a different storyHarvey Williamson wrote: Is it really appropriate to have a beta at the top of a rating list? I wish more games would be given to some engines that are released and in need of further testing.
Maybe your right. perhaps the 'best' list should only include released engines!?
Best Wishes,
Harvey
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
That is certainly an idea to consider - maybe we could do something like that with the pure listHarvey Williamson wrote:
Hi Ray,
Maybe your right. perhaps the 'best' list should only include released engines!?
Best Wishes,
Harvey
-
- Posts: 10282
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
This is a big disappointment.
only 5 elo more than 2.3.1 and I suspect that it is only thanks to beating other rybkas.
It seems that beta2 is full of bugs because it seems that only fixing the bugs of 2.3.1 of seeing mate when there is no mate could give more rating points.
I hope it is not going to get released in this week and vas will send another beta to test before releasing it.
I expected a significant improvement.
Uri
only 5 elo more than 2.3.1 and I suspect that it is only thanks to beating other rybkas.
It seems that beta2 is full of bugs because it seems that only fixing the bugs of 2.3.1 of seeing mate when there is no mate could give more rating points.
I hope it is not going to get released in this week and vas will send another beta to test before releasing it.
I expected a significant improvement.
Uri
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:19 pm
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A surprising new number one
Hey, you are actually right! Here is the current list:Vempele wrote:Funnily enough, Glaurung 2-epsilon/4 is the first engine to break the 3100 barrier, with a 66.4% LOS over Rybka! Congratulations to Tord Romstad for this marvelous feat!
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html
A good moment for the CCRL to stop their efforts, IMHO.
Tord
-
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:55 pm
- Location: Brighton - UK
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
Hi Harvey,
We already exclude betas from our pure list
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.li ... _pure.html
So 2.3.2 beta2 is not there
Shaun
P.S. H11.2 give me something that will give Rybka slightly less of an easy time
We already exclude betas from our pure list
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.li ... _pure.html
So 2.3.2 beta2 is not there
Shaun
P.S. H11.2 give me something that will give Rybka slightly less of an easy time
Re: CCRL 40/4 - A new number one
Yes but - Best is what people browsing your lists for the 1st time will look at - they wont understand what pure means. If Vas releases anything its tested in days. Loop releases 2 official engines this week - how long till they are fully both tested?Shaun wrote:Hi Harvey,
We already exclude betas from our pure list
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.li ... _pure.html
So 2.3.2 beta2 is not there
Shaun
P.S. H11.2 give me something that will give Rybka slightly less of an easy time
Last edited by Harvey Williamson on Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.