Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.
Moderators: hgm , Rebel , chrisw
Aser Huerga
Posts: 812 Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Spain
Post
by Aser Huerga » Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:43 pm
Standings after Round 8
Code: Select all
1 Bright 0.4a 2888 46.5/64
2 Spike 1.2 Turin 2839 34.5/64
3 Delfi 5.4 2788 33.5/64
4 Movei 00.8.438 (10 10 10) 2737 31.5/64 997.50
5 Colossus 2008b 2750 31.5/64 959.25
6 Alaric707 2763 30.0/64
7 WildCat 8 2736 27.5/64
8 E.T. Chess 13.01.08 2749 27.0/64
9 Deuterium 09.01.26.492 -2714- 26.0/64
(All ELOs referred to the last Chess Computer Rating List when tournament starts, except -XXXX- one, wich are referred to performance).
12 rounds, 36 games each round, for a total of 432 games.
Target engine:
Deuterium 09.01.26.492
I will post here some partial results and final standings. For a closer look:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=4799
Aser Huerga
Posts: 812 Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Spain
Post
by Aser Huerga » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:39 pm
Final Standings
Code: Select all
1 Bright 0.4a 2888 69.5/96
2 Delfi 5.4 2788 53.5/96
3 Spike 1.2 Turin 2839 50.5/96
4 Movei 00.8.438 (10 10 10) 2737 48.5/96
5 Alaric707 2763 47.5/96
6 Colossus 2008b 2750 44.5/96
7 E.T. Chess 13.01.08 2749 41.5/96 1975.50
8 WildCat 8 2736 41.5/96 1973.75
9 Deuterium 09.01.26.492 -2683- 35.0/96
(All ELOs referred to the last Chess Computer Rating List when tournament starts, except -XXXX- one, wich are referred to performance).
Code: Select all
Deuterium 09.01.26.492 : -86 96 (+ 21,= 28,- 47), 36.5 %
Alaric707 : 12 (+ 2,= 2,- 8), 25.0 %
Bright 0.4a : 12 (+ 0,= 3,- 9), 12.5 %
Colossus 2008b : 12 (+ 4,= 4,- 4), 50.0 %
Delfi 5.4 : 12 (+ 1,= 6,- 5), 33.3 %
E.T. Chess 13.01.08 : 12 (+ 4,= 3,- 5), 45.8 %
Movei 00.8.438 (10 10 10) : 12 (+ 5,= 2,- 5), 50.0 %
Spike 1.2 Turin : 12 (+ 1,= 4,- 7), 25.0 %
WildCat 8 : 12 (+ 4,= 4,- 4), 50.0 %
For a closer look:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=4799
Ferdy
Posts: 4833 Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines
Post
by Ferdy » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:21 pm
Aser Huerga wrote: Final Standings
Code: Select all
1 Bright 0.4a 2888 69.5/96
2 Delfi 5.4 2788 53.5/96
3 Spike 1.2 Turin 2839 50.5/96
4 Movei 00.8.438 (10 10 10) 2737 48.5/96
5 Alaric707 2763 47.5/96
6 Colossus 2008b 2750 44.5/96
7 E.T. Chess 13.01.08 2749 41.5/96 1975.50
8 WildCat 8 2736 41.5/96 1973.75
9 Deuterium 09.01.26.492 -2683- 35.0/96
(All ELOs referred to the last Chess Computer Rating List when tournament starts, except -XXXX- one, wich are referred to performance).
Code: Select all
Deuterium 09.01.26.492 : -86 96 (+ 21,= 28,- 47), 36.5 %
Alaric707 : 12 (+ 2,= 2,- 8), 25.0 %
Bright 0.4a : 12 (+ 0,= 3,- 9), 12.5 %
Colossus 2008b : 12 (+ 4,= 4,- 4), 50.0 %
Delfi 5.4 : 12 (+ 1,= 6,- 5), 33.3 %
E.T. Chess 13.01.08 : 12 (+ 4,= 3,- 5), 45.8 %
Movei 00.8.438 (10 10 10) : 12 (+ 5,= 2,- 5), 50.0 %
Spike 1.2 Turin : 12 (+ 1,= 4,- 7), 25.0 %
WildCat 8 : 12 (+ 4,= 4,- 4), 50.0 %
For a closer look:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=4799
Thanks Aser for this tourney.
Aser Huerga
Posts: 812 Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Spain
Post
by Aser Huerga » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:38 pm
Thanks Ferdinand, and sorry for the delay, I was on holidays the last days.
I was looking for positions where Deuterium showed differences in evaluation that turned to be wrong. I don't know if this could be useful and/or interesting to anyone, what do you think?
(First move is always Deuterium turn)
a) [D]2q3k1/1r1b2pp/pbr2pP1/2p4N/2P5/1P1Q1P2/P3R2P/3R2K1 w - - 1 46
Bb6 {+2.83/11 9} 46. Re7 {+1.33/13 14}
b) [D]8/6r1/p4k2/2PPpbp1/1P1p4/3B2P1/5P2/2B2K2 w - - 3 47
47. Ke2 {+1.43/13 11} e4 {+0.89/16 15}
c) [D]r1b2r1k/1p2p1b1/1qp5/4PpNB/3P1Q1P/pP6/P4KP1/1R1R4 b - - 0 25
Ra5 {-1.35/13 9} 26. Bf7 {+4.22/11 11}
d) [D]r4k1r/p3q2p/1P1Np1pP/4N3/2p3Q1/8/PP3P1P/R3K2b b Q - 0 21
axb6 {-0.07/11 2} 22. O-O-O {+2.52/10 5}
e) [D]6k1/r1pq1p2/1p3Ppp/rP1pP2P/p2Pn3/R2QN1P1/1PR5/6K1 b - - 0 35
gxh5 {-0.39/12 10} 36. Qe2 {+2.77/13 5}
I could add wich game position belongs:
f) [D]r5k1/p1pp2p1/1p5p/4p2n/2PnP2q/P1N2P2/1P5P/R2Q1RK1 w - - 0 18
18. b4 {-0.37/12 9} Rf8 {+2.20/12 11} (Game 407)
g) [D]1rb2rk1/2p1bppp/p1nq1n2/1p1Pp3/4P3/2N2NP1/PPQ2PBP/R1B2RK1 b - - 2 13
Na5 {-0.22/13 11} 14. Nxe5 {+1.24/11 8} (Game 423)
h) [D]8/5R1p/p7/P2p3p/1Ppb2kP/8/4K3/8 b - - 1 53
Bc3 {-0.17/16 7} 54. b5 {+2.38/14 4} (Game 424)
Ferdy
Posts: 4833 Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines
Post
by Ferdy » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:34 pm
Aser Huerga wrote: Thanks Ferdinand, and sorry for the delay, I was on holidays the last days.
I was looking for positions where Deuterium showed differences in evaluation that turned to be wrong. I don't know if this could be useful and/or interesting to anyone, what do you think?
(First move is always Deuterium turn)
a) 2q3k1/1r1b2pp/pbr2pP1/2p4N/2P5/1P1Q1P2/P3R2P/3R2K1 w - - 1 46
Bb6 {+2.83/11 9} 46. Re7 {+1.33/13 14}
b) 8/6r1/p4k2/2PPpbp1/1P1p4/3B2P1/5P2/2B2K2 w - - 3 47
47. Ke2 {+1.43/13 11} e4 {+0.89/16 15}
c) r1b2r1k/1p2p1b1/1qp5/4PpNB/3P1Q1P/pP6/P4KP1/1R1R4 b - - 0 25
Ra5 {-1.35/13 9} 26. Bf7 {+4.22/11 11}
d)r4k1r/p3q2p/1P1Np1pP/4N3/2p3Q1/8/PP3P1P/R3K2b b Q - 0 21
axb6 {-0.07/11 2} 22. O-O-O {+2.52/10 5}
e) 6k1/r1pq1p2/1p3Ppp/rP1pP2P/p2Pn3/R2QN1P1/1PR5/6K1 b - - 0 35
gxh5 {-0.39/12 10} 36. Qe2 {+2.77/13 5}
I could add wich game position belongs:
f) r5k1/p1pp2p1/1p5p/4p2n/2PnP2q/P1N2P2/1P5P/R2Q1RK1 w - - 0 18
18. b4 {-0.37/12 9} Rf8 {+2.20/12 11} (Game 407)
g) 1rb2rk1/2p1bppp/p1nq1n2/1p1Pp3/4P3/2N2NP1/PPQ2PBP/R1B2RK1 b - - 2 13
Na5 {-0.22/13 11} 14. Nxe5 {+1.24/11 8} (Game 423)
h)8/5R1p/p7/P2p3p/1Ppb2kP/8/4K3/8 b - - 1 53
Bc3 {-0.17/16 7} 54. b5 {+2.38/14 4} (Game 424)
There's nothing to sorry about, hope you enjoyed your holidays
These are all interesting to me, I will look into these positions further, I actually would like to replay the games.