If you're interested in the technical details behind the Fritz software's decision to resign, it really has everything to do with the engine's numerical evaluation. With "Early" selected, the Fritz program will resign if it sees it's behind by 4.8 pawn units (or more) three moves in a row. So you'll need to be ahead by about a Rook, or two minor pieces, or a minor and a couple of pawns, or some combination of material and positional criteria exceeding 4.8 pawns (and maintain that advantage for at least three consecutive turns) before Fritz calls it quits with the "Early" setting selected. With "Late" selected, you'll need to be ahead by a larger margin (although still for just three consecutive turns); the margin must be at least 6.5 pawns (or the material/positional equivalent) when you've clicked the radio button beside "Late".
It seems Rybka is in good form . Still possible for SF to do similar score as Houdini but it will be very hard now. I was hoping better result from SF.
pacifist wrote:It seems Rybka is in good form . Still possible for SF to do similar score as Houdini but it will be very hard now. I was hoping better result from SF.
Well I kind of agree. SF hasn't won in 12 games or so. But it's not over yet!
pacifist wrote:It seems Rybka is in good form . Still possible for SF to do similar score as Houdini but it will be very hard now. I was hoping better result from SF.
Well I kind of agree. SF hasn't won in 12 games or so. But it's not over yet!
If it did catch up, it would look like something went wrong.
pacifist wrote:Something is wrong : 10/13 the last 13 games? Settings are the same?
I saw near the beginning, that SF finds it hard to cope with Rybka 4. Any win, was just at great stress, not like it had the technique and was on top of it.
According to the way it appeared to me, when seeing early games, it is not surprising what has happened in the past 13 games. It's just that I HOPED it would be otherwise.