Next list as per January 29th, 2012
Code:
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Komodo 4.0 x64 : 3141 27 26 350 66.3 % 3023 46.9 %
2 Houdini 1.5 x64 : 3137 23 23 550 64.4 % 3035 40.7 %
3 Rybka 4.0 x64 : 3126 21 21 550 64.0 % 3026 48.4 %
4 Komodo 2.03 x64 : 3097 23 23 500 61.7 % 3014 45.4 %
5 Stockfish 2.0 x64 : 3087 22 22 500 61.2 % 3008 48.8 %
6 Critter 0.90 x64 : 3051 21 21 550 57.2 % 3001 46.0 %
7 Naum 4.2 x64 : 3019 17 17 800 53.0 % 2998 49.0 %
8 Chiron 1.1a x64 : 2984 29 30 300 42.3 % 3038 44.0 %
9 Spike 1.4 : 2982 23 23 500 46.8 % 3004 42.0 %
10 Deep Shredder 12 x64 : 2981 19 19 700 50.9 % 2975 45.9 %
11 Deep Sjeng ct 2010 : 2977 26 26 350 38.7 % 3057 48.9 %
12 Rybka 1.2f x64 : 2947 18 18 750 60.5 % 2873 45.9 %
13 Gull 1.2 x64 : 2936 25 25 450 40.0 % 3007 40.9 %
14 Deep Junior 12.5.0.3 x64 : 2929 25 25 400 54.1 % 2901 47.8 %
15 Spark 1.0 x64 : 2924 30 30 300 54.7 % 2892 40.7 %
16 Fritz 12 : 2921 21 21 550 47.2 % 2941 46.0 %
17 Hiarcs 13.1 : 2899 22 22 550 37.6 % 2986 41.8 %
18 Fritz 11 : 2889 30 30 300 57.8 % 2834 42.3 %
19 Deep Sjeng WC2008 x64 : 2864 21 21 650 42.5 % 2917 40.3 %
20 Loop 2007 x64 : 2812 27 27 350 47.7 % 2828 45.7 %
21 Spike 1.2 Turin : 2793 24 24 450 47.0 % 2814 44.7 %
22 Toga II 1.3.1 : 2771 30 30 350 36.6 % 2866 36.0 %
23 Fruit 2.2.1 : 2770 22 22 600 37.1 % 2862 37.8 %
24 Hiarcs 10 : 2758 26 26 400 41.6 % 2817 40.8 %
25 Bobcat 2.75 x64 : 2742 29 29 350 35.4 % 2846 39.4 %
26 Ktulu 8 : 2716 33 33 300 35.3 % 2821 34.0 %
* 6200 games
* Startrating 2944
* Fruit 2.2.1 set to a fixed rating of 2700
* EloStat 1.3 by Frank Schubert
Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
Condratulations although this time control is totally irrelevant to me as a chess player and as a tester....
Dr.D
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
Perhaps so, but it is the most relevant one for anyone who uses engines for analysis.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Condratulations although this time control is totally irrelevant to me as a chess player and as a tester....
Dr.D
-
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:35 pm
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
What is the official link for that list?
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
-
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
I guess this is a missunderstanding, because your header says 40/2 whichlkaufman wrote:Perhaps so, but it is the most relevant one for anyone who uses engines for analysis.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Condratulations although this time control is totally irrelevant to me as a chess player and as a tester....
Dr.D
practically means 40/2min in the tester world, instead of 40/120 or 40/2h,
which seems what you wanted to say and which is the original CEGT header
too.
Guenther
-
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
If you say 40/2 to any tournament chessplayer he will assume you mean two hours, not two minutes. None of the major testing organizations tests as fast a 40/2 minutes; the only 40/2 testing they do is two hours. So I think the caption is accurate, though I imagine you are not the only one who misunderstood.
-
- Posts: 5106
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:27 pm
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
There is also the results against Houdini 2 where one of our testers played 40/90 minutes and Komodo finished slightly ahead after 56 games. Not a very convincing sample, but it would take too much patience to play several thousand games at that level on a quad to see if this result was a fluke.lkaufman wrote:If you say 40/2 to any tournament chessplayer he will assume you mean two hours, not two minutes. None of the major testing organizations tests as fast a 40/2 minutes; the only 40/2 testing they do is two hours. So I think the caption is accurate, though I imagine you are not the only one who misunderstood.
-
- Posts: 4610
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
Well, I did not missunderstand you but the previous poster... and even whilelkaufman wrote:If you say 40/2 to any tournament chessplayer he will assume you mean two hours, not two minutes. None of the major testing organizations tests as fast a 40/2 minutes; the only 40/2 testing they do is two hours. So I think the caption is accurate, though I imagine you are not the only one who misunderstood.
I am a tournament player I disagree about the meaning in computerchess.
(The PGN standard even wants the sum in seconds)
Guenther
-
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Look who's number 1 at 40/2 on CEGT!
I thought the previous poster got it right and just doesn't care about anything except blitz chess. Perhaps I am wrong; only he can clarify this.