I had run the first commercial version 1.0 and then the experimental 1.01 ag. so many different engines- I was looking for a new opponent for this new and here to stay 1.01.
I knew that it was a slight elo drop from Vitruvius' other competition, but heck- Chiron is commercial and it did win the latest CCT 14. So I think it was an ok match.
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Chiron used Nalimov)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games
Code: Select all
1 Vitruvius_1.01C_x32 +200 +31/-5/=14 76.00% 38.0/50
2 Chiron 1.1a 32bit -200 +5/-31/=14 24.00% 12.0/50
Obviously Vitruvius is the stronger engine- but by 200 elo? Being 1 50-game match, I would certainly not be ready to assume that. Maybe it is that much stronger- maybe it isn't. At the moment it just "is what it is"- a 50 game match that Vitruvius won.
Of course there will be more to follow, and Gabriel (Gab) is taking care of the "long-game testing" for us.
Back to my cubby-hole, aptly named by my wife-
g
e
o
r
g
e