Houdini 4 - StockfishRW 140312 Live Blitz Match

[mwyoung]

Houdini 4 default 1 Core
StockfishRW 140312 default 1 Core
I7 840 @ 3.1Ghz
GM book to 8 Moves
SSHD with 6 man tables

1 core blitz test TC= 3mins + 2sec.

View Live @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB6tS3Z2vv0

[felix]

The match is a mess. Maybe you need to take a look

[shrapnel]

The match is a mess. Maybe you need to take a look

Why ? Rotten 'fish' blitzing all over the place or what ?

[felix]

No answer after the engines are out the opening book

[Sedat Canbaz]

The match is a mess. Maybe you need to take a look

+1

Just I'd like to add...

I don't take very seriously those games :
- Who run matches via live broadcasting tools on same PC
- Who run multiply matches on same PC (running several engines or GUIs)
- Who are testing the engines with handicapped opening positions
- Who are testing the chess engines mainly with adapters...
vs...

*Due to (as I mentioned before):
-We cant't be sure how much the chess engines performance are suffering and affecting with such disadvantage/flaky conditions...!!!


Hope this helps...!!

Best,
Sedat

[mwyoung]

The match is a mess. Maybe you need to take a look

Houdini 4 refused to play the fish anymore without a appearance fee. Houdini has been paid, and the match restarted.

[mwyoung]

The match is a mess. Maybe you need to take a look

+1

Just I'd like to add...

I don't take very seriously those games :
- Who run matches via live broadcasting tools on same PC
- Who run multiply matches on same PC (running several engines or GUIs)
- Who are testing the engines with handicapped opening positions
- Who are testing the chess engines mainly with adapters...
vs...

*Due to (as I mentioned before):
-We cant't be sure how much the chess engines performance are suffering and affecting with such disadvantage/flaky conditions...!!!


Hope this helps...!!

Best,
Sedat

Yes you can, since we know how the programs perform under both conditions. The results are the same.

You tube broadcast of engine chess matches seems popular, and I have request for a number of matches. If you don't like them, don't watch them.

I have many people watch the matches and check on the status of the matches. My average view duration for each view is

Average Live View Duration
00:13:10

and that is long average time for people to watch a broadcast on You tube.

And have had thousands of views of my matches that I post and broadcast.

So the matches will continue, since that is the point of having a You tube Channel about computer chess.

[felix]

Is better than tv!

Thanks for the match

[Sedat Canbaz]

The match is a mess. Maybe you need to take a look

+1

Just I'd like to add...

I don't take very seriously those games :
- Who run matches via live broadcasting tools on same PC
- Who run multiply matches on same PC (running several engines or GUIs)
- Who are testing the engines with handicapped opening positions
- Who are testing the chess engines mainly with adapters...
vs...

*Due to (as I mentioned before):
-We cant't be sure how much the chess engines performance are suffering and affecting with such disadvantage/flaky conditions...!!!


Hope this helps...!!

Best,
Sedat

Yes you can, since we know how the programs perform under both conditions. The results are the same.

You tube broadcast of engine chess matches seems popular, and I have request for a number of matches. If you don't like them, don't watch them.

I have many people watch the matches and check on the status of the matches. My average view duration for each view is

Average Live View Duration
00:13:10

and that is long average time for people to watch a broadcast on You tube.

And have had thousands of views of my matches that I post and broadcast.

So the matches will continue, since that is the point of having a You tube Channel about computer chess.

No problem Mark

You have full right as you wish, it is your own live test!

Frankly,
I just wanted to express my opinion about ideal testing, for maximum engine performance,for better quality games...

And as I mentioned before,
I don't expect everyone to agree with my statements, if everybody agrees... that means I am doing it wrong!!

One thing more,
Someone's are interested in beauty, e.g Me in strength!

That's the difference!!

But however,
I respect your work and thanks for your efforts

Good luck with your tournaments,
Sedat

[tttony]

Big thanks Mark Young, do you have any kind of updated-site with the results at the moment?