Page 2 of 2
Re: Lc0 and future of rating lists
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:11 am
by Ras
carldaman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:43 amIs it totally correct to think of CCRL as equal hardware where you have 1, 2 and 4CPU entities competing and being rated together?
I think this is to measure how much Elo the parallel version of an engine gains.
Re: Lc0 and future of rating lists
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:33 am
by Graham Banks
Ras wrote: ↑Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:11 am
carldaman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:43 amIs it totally correct to think of CCRL as equal hardware where you have 1, 2 and 4CPU entities competing and being rated together?
I think this is to measure how much Elo the parallel version of an engine gains.
There are only 1CPU and 4CPU anyway, so must be years since he visited.
Re: Lc0 and future of rating lists
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:23 pm
by ThatsIt
carldaman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:43 am
[...snip...]
Why can't a GPU become something like a new category of hardware? I know a lot depends on the actual GPU, and benchmarking that can become tricky, but maybe a 'most common denominator' GPU could be used as a new category of engine hardware (?)
Thats what i called a "black box".
We will do so @ CEGT 40/4+... :
http://cegt.forumieren.com/t1082-testin ... 20-2-32930
There is absolutely no need to use a RTX-Card for testing
against 1-, 2-, or 4-CPU A/B-Engines on CPUs like ours.
A middle-rate
GPU will do.
Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT member)