I just saw the last two games of Stoofvlees II a 11 and its was hitting 12.6 knps which is twice more than with a GTX 1650, to me that is great, but Scorpion was hitting three times more, closer to 37 knps
How close in strength is ScorpioNN to Stoofvlees II a10 ?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 5588
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: How close in strength is ScorpioNN to Stoofvlees II a10 ?
Who is 17 years old GM Gukesh 2nd at the Candidate in Toronto?
https://indianexpress.com/article/sport ... t-9281394/
https://indianexpress.com/article/sport ... t-9281394/
-
- Posts: 2872
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
- Location: Germany
- Full name: Werner Schüle
Re: How close in strength is ScorpioNN to Stoofvlees II a10 ?
Here is the Output of scorpio with my Card:
# nodes = 399689 <0% qnodes> time = 9060ms nps = 44115 eps = 0 nneps = 5183
# Tree: nodes = 64332 depth = 19 pps = 5172 visits = 46703
# qsearch_calls = 0 search_calls = 0
Daniel says nps does not mean much, I shall compare nneps. But TCEC shows the nps I think and I saw here 100-150 knps.
I thought TCEC uses much better grafic cards - so only 2x to gtx 1650 seems to be not great ??
# nodes = 399689 <0% qnodes> time = 9060ms nps = 44115 eps = 0 nneps = 5183
# Tree: nodes = 64332 depth = 19 pps = 5172 visits = 46703
# qsearch_calls = 0 search_calls = 0
Daniel says nps does not mean much, I shall compare nneps. But TCEC shows the nps I think and I saw here 100-150 knps.
I thought TCEC uses much better grafic cards - so only 2x to gtx 1650 seems to be not great ??
Werner
-
- Posts: 4185
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
Re: How close in strength is ScorpioNN to Stoofvlees II a10 ?
Hi Werner,
Yes, nps is meaningless as it counts also nodes where NN evaluation is not done.
TCEC shows the nneps/pps value which are almost the same.The difference between pps and nneps
is that pps includes cached nodes counts so pps could be 2-3x greater when there is a ponder hit.
I think it gets on average 70knps and in endgames closer to 150knps there.
Daniel
Yes, nps is meaningless as it counts also nodes where NN evaluation is not done.
TCEC shows the nneps/pps value which are almost the same.The difference between pps and nneps
is that pps includes cached nodes counts so pps could be 2-3x greater when there is a ponder hit.
I think it gets on average 70knps and in endgames closer to 150knps there.
Daniel
-
- Posts: 5588
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: How close in strength is ScorpioNN to Stoofvlees II a10 ?
Are you working on a newer version of ScorpioNN?, since it will have very tough competitors when it reach Division P against Houdini, Komodo, Alliestein, and mainly versus Stockfisk, and LCZero, In TCECDaniel Shawul wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 3:57 pm Hi Werner,
Yes, nps is meaningless as it counts also nodes where NN evaluation is not done.
TCEC shows the nneps/pps value which are almost the same.The difference between pps and nneps
is that pps includes cached nodes counts so pps could be 2-3x greater when there is a ponder hit.
I think it gets on average 70knps and in endgames closer to 150knps there.
Daniel
PS: How does the INT8 works ?
Who is 17 years old GM Gukesh 2nd at the Candidate in Toronto?
https://indianexpress.com/article/sport ... t-9281394/
https://indianexpress.com/article/sport ... t-9281394/