Francesca MAD 0.25 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 33009
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Francesca MAD 0.25 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40

Post by Graham Banks » Thu Oct 03, 2019 9:12 pm

My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 33009
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Francesca MAD 0.25 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40

Post by Graham Banks » Thu Oct 03, 2019 9:14 pm

Code: Select all

CCRL 40/40 Rating List - Custom engine selection
1086555 games played by 2544 programs, run by 23 testers
Ponder off, General books (up to 12 moves), 3-4-5 piece EGTB
Time control: Equivalent to 40 moves in 40 minutes on Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4 GHz), about 15 minutes on a modern Intel CPU.
Computed on September 28, 2019 with Bayeselo based on 1'086'555 games
Tested by CCRL team, 2005-2019, http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/

Rank               Engine                Elo   +    -   Score  AvOp  Games
1 Francesca MAD 0.25 64-bit          2790  +25  -25  46.0%  +25.9   490
  Francesca MAD 0.24 64-bit          2756  +20  -20  54.1%  -26.7   800
  Francesca MAD 0.22 64-bit          2700  +19  -19  48.6%   +8.7   988
  Francesca MAD 0.21 64-bit          2666  +22  -22  55.3%  -36.8   684
  Francesca MAD 0.20 64-bit          2600  +27  -27  48.2%  +12.5   452
  Francesca MAD 0.19                 2558  +15  -15  48.6%   +9.3  1548
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz

User avatar
silentshark
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Francesca MAD 0.25 64-bit Gauntlet for CCRL 40/40

Post by silentshark » Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:04 pm

Thanks so much for running the gauntlet.

I'm struggling to make progress now. Probably need to look at the eval as that isn't very good..

Cheers,
Tom

Post Reply