1. g4 d5 2. g5
[d]rnbqkbnr/ppp1pppp/8/3p2P1/8/8/PPPPPP1P/RNBQKBNR b KQkq -
Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
Your beliefs create your reality, so be careful what you wish for.
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
As long as you don't suggest moves or discuss lines, I think so (for instance, Nelson Hernandez was kibitzing on the games of the World Correspondence Chess Championship at Rybka Forum, mainly about his database statistics, but he was commenting on the positions without hinting about what moves would be played or what lines to expect).
Your beliefs create your reality, so be careful what you wish for.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
Maybe a 5 move delay would be in order to remove some of the restrictions on what can be talked about.Ovyron wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:11 am As long as you don't suggest moves or discuss lines, I think so (for instance, Nelson Hernandez was kibitzing on the games of the World Correspondence Chess Championship at Rybka Forum, mainly about his database statistics, but he was commenting on the positions without hinting about what moves would be played or what lines to expect).
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
- Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
- Full name: Harvey Williamson
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
I would say yes as long as you are not suggesting what we should play next, just looking at alternatives to what we play etc....
If anyone is wondering why we are playing this game see this thread http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=72084
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
- Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
- Full name: Harvey Williamson
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
[pgn]1. g4 d5 2. g5 e5[/pgn]
Lot's of possible moves here. I briefly looked at h6 and e6 but e5 looks the most natural. g5 was not a move I was expecting so will be interesting.
Lot's of possible moves here. I briefly looked at h6 and e6 but e5 looks the most natural. g5 was not a move I was expecting so will be interesting.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
Harvey Williamson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:20 am [pgn]1. g4 d5 2. g5 e5[/pgn]
Lot's of possible moves here. I briefly looked at h6 and e6 but e5 looks the most natural. g5 was not a move I was expecting so will be interesting.
The first occurance I have of 2.g5 was by Henry Grob played in 1964. That makes it an appropriate move to play in this game!
I don't have the whole game though only the reference. Anyone have the game or an earlier game with this move?
Regards,
Regards
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
Who is Dylan Sharp?Harvey Williamson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:18 am
If anyone is wondering why we are playing this game see this thread http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=72084
Never mind. Just another pseudonym for Ovyron.
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
- Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
- Full name: Harvey Williamson
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
[pgn][Event "corr"]
[Site "corr"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Grob, Henry"]
[Black "Schnirel"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A00"]
[PlyCount "33"]
[EventDate "1964.??.??"]
[EventType "tourn (corr)"]
[EventRounds "9"]
[SourceTitle "Corr 2000"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2000.04.19"]
[SourceVersion "1"]
[SourceVersionDate "2000.04.19"]
[SourceQuality "1"]
1. g4 d5 2. g5 e5 3. h4 Bc5 4. c3 Nc6 5. b4 Bd6 6. Bg2 Nge7 7. b5 Na5 8. d3 c6
9. a4 a6 10. bxa6 Rxa6 11. Qc2 Bf5 12. Nd2 Ng6 13. Nb3 Nxb3 14. Qxb3 Rb6 15.
Qc2 Qe7 16. e3 h5 17. Ne2 1/2-1/2
[/pgn]
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Dylan Sharp Vs. Harvey Williamson (G4)
Stockfish-dev says -1.18 at depth 60. This is with Analysis Contempt = off.Harvey Williamson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:20 am [pgn]1. g4 d5 2. g5 e5[/pgn]
Lot's of possible moves here. I briefly looked at h6 and e6 but e5 looks the most natural. g5 was not a move I was expecting so will be interesting.