Here is "Le Môle", a mountain in France (Haute Savoie).
Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:04 am
- Location: France
- Full name: Richard Delorme
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
Richard Delorme
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
The variations I analyze don't matter. What matters is that I understand what I need to do to win. And if I do it, then luck will not be involved, as I could beat you every single time, like with 1.g4.
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "4r3/5pk1/1q1r1p1p/1p1Pn2Q/1Pp4P/6P1/5PB1/R3R1K1 b - -"]
1... f5 2. Qd1 Rdd8 3. Re3 f4
[d]3rr3/5pk1/1q5p/1p1Pn3/1Pp2p1P/4R1P1/5PB1/R2Q2K1 w - -
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
Really?Ovyron wrote: ↑Sat May 09, 2020 4:13 pmThe variations I analyze don't matter. What matters is that I understand what I need to do to win. And if I do it, then luck will not be involved, as I could beat you every single time, like with 1.g4.
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "4r3/5pk1/1q1r1p1p/1p1Pn2Q/1Pp4P/6P1/5PB1/R3R1K1 b - -"]
1... f5 2. Qd1 Rdd8 3. Re3 f4
[d]3rr3/5pk1/1q5p/1p1Pn3/1Pp2p1P/4R1P1/5PB1/R2Q2K1 w - -
I didn't have this as a line of play. I suspect there is reason I didn't have this move in my analysis, so it shouldn't take long for me to bust this line of play...
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
Note that I got 3...f4 to a -2.50 score in less than an hour of analysis (from the root position before 1...f5) before the game started so this post of yours basically proves high depth useless here and big hardware unnecessaryZenmastur wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 10:07 pm I wanted to see what it looked like from your perspective, so I loaded 5-man syzygy and did a multi-PV 4 on the current board position to see what it would come up with if I let it run a while. I figure if you let your computer run for a couple of weeks the output will look something like this:
Notice that the score hasn't increased from your original score of -2.50.Code: Select all
[-2.50 ] Depth: 86/116 Nodes: 1969180574K Hash: 100% TB hits: 2135292945 Current:(4/41)
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
Well, I was of the opinion before we started that almost all moves win. So, the fact that this wasn't in my analysis might just mean it wins slower than the best move. I guess we'll see after I've analyzed it.Ovyron wrote: ↑Sat May 09, 2020 11:48 pmNote that I got 3...f4 to a -2.50 score in less than an hour of analysis (from the root position before 1...f5) before the game started so this post of yours basically proves high depth useless here and big hardware unnecessaryZenmastur wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 10:07 pm I wanted to see what it looked like from your perspective, so I loaded 5-man syzygy and did a multi-PV 4 on the current board position to see what it would come up with if I let it run a while. I figure if you let your computer run for a couple of weeks the output will look something like this:
Notice that the score hasn't increased from your original score of -2.50.Code: Select all
[-2.50 ] Depth: 86/116 Nodes: 1969180574K Hash: 100% TB hits: 2135292945 Current:(4/41)
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
So it never crossed your mind that it may be the fastest winning move and that after it anybody would easily win with it (specially people with slow hardware), huh?
The level of prejudice is incredible, but if this stands for a "move missed by guy on big hardware while guy on slow one finds it in less than one hour" example, I'm all for it!
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
It looks like a fast way to throw away your win, but I've only analyzed for about an hour.Ovyron wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 3:09 pmSo it never crossed your mind that it may be the fastest winning move and that after it anybody would easily win with it (specially people with slow hardware), huh?
The level of prejudice is incredible, but if this stands for a "move missed by guy on big hardware while guy on slow one finds it in less than one hour" example, I'm all for it!
-
- Posts: 10376
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
NoOvyron wrote: ↑Sat May 09, 2020 11:48 pmNote that I got 3...f4 to a -2.50 score in less than an hour of analysis (from the root position before 1...f5) before the game started so this post of yours basically proves high depth useless here and big hardware unnecessaryZenmastur wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 10:07 pm I wanted to see what it looked like from your perspective, so I loaded 5-man syzygy and did a multi-PV 4 on the current board position to see what it would come up with if I let it run a while. I figure if you let your computer run for a couple of weeks the output will look something like this:
Notice that the score hasn't increased from your original score of -2.50.Code: Select all
[-2.50 ] Depth: 86/116 Nodes: 1969180574K Hash: 100% TB hits: 2135292945 Current:(4/41)
This -2.50 score is only with 5-man syzygy tablebases.
Good hardware means using also 6 and maybe 7-man syzygy tablebases during the search.
The fact that high depth without more tablebases does not help does not mean that big hardware does not help because big hardware is not only high depth but also using more tablebases.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
I had the position before f5 was played at a very high score for black. I've never seen a game drawn from a position with the type of evaluation unless the winning side blundered. That move dropped the score into a range where it's possible to draw. That doesn't mean it is a draw but the possibility is there. So, it's clearly an inferior move. If he makes another move like that one a draw is likely assured. In the mean time I'm trying to optimize his probability of making a similar mistake, which takes a lot of extra calculation time.zullil wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 3:54 pmIt looks like a fast way to throw away your win, but I've only analyzed for about an hour.Ovyron wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 3:09 pmSo it never crossed your mind that it may be the fastest winning move and that after it anybody would easily win with it (specially people with slow hardware), huh?
The level of prejudice is incredible, but if this stands for a "move missed by guy on big hardware while guy on slow one finds it in less than one hour" example, I'm all for it!
True enough. It also means I can look at many variations that would normally take way too much time.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 4:42 pmNoOvyron wrote: ↑Sat May 09, 2020 11:48 pmNote that I got 3...f4 to a -2.50 score in less than an hour of analysis (from the root position before 1...f5) before the game started so this post of yours basically proves high depth useless here and big hardware unnecessaryZenmastur wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 10:07 pm I wanted to see what it looked like from your perspective, so I loaded 5-man syzygy and did a multi-PV 4 on the current board position to see what it would come up with if I let it run a while. I figure if you let your computer run for a couple of weeks the output will look something like this:
Notice that the score hasn't increased from your original score of -2.50.Code: Select all
[-2.50 ] Depth: 86/116 Nodes: 1969180574K Hash: 100% TB hits: 2135292945 Current:(4/41)
This -2.50 score is only with 5-man syzygy tablebases.
Good hardware means using also 6 and maybe 7-man syzygy tablebases during the search.
The fact that high depth without more tablebases does not help does not mean that big hardware does not help because big hardware is not only high depth but also using more tablebases.
e.g. the Multi-pv I did to deapth 86. I purposely crippled my hardware to make it act more like Ovyron's. Even so it took less than an hour. That's why it only showed -2.50. The “real” evaluation, using the full potential of the hardware was several times that value. Of course, this isn't good for me, but I knew that before we started, so no big surprise there.
1... f5 2. Qd1 Rdd8 3. Re3 f4 4.gxf4
[d]3rr3/5pk1/1q5p/1p1Pn3/1Pp2P1P/4R3/5PB1/R2Q2K1 b - - 0 4
Regards,
Zenmastur
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: Zenmastur vs Ovyron No it's not another GROB II!
Edit:
This should read "before f4 was played".
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.