Page 1 of 1
FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese 2.2
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:27 pm
by fastgm
FGRL rating list -
60 sec + 0.6 sec
Stockfish 12 (
+66 to Stockfish 11)
SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3 (
+4 to SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.2)
Lc0 0.26.1 721990 (
+243 to Lc0 CPU 11258-112x9-se)
Cheese 2.2 (
+50 to Cheese 2.1)
http://www.fastgm.de
Re: FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:19 am
by jonkr
Thanks for testing. I was hoping for +15 but at least it wasn't negative =). I noticed it did better against some of the stronger opponents but not enough to assume anything more than luck. Possibly the gains were more situational and/or self-play specific than I expected this time.
Re: FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:28 am
by AndrewGrant
jonkr wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:19 am
Thanks for testing. I was hoping for +15 but at least it wasn't negative =). I noticed it did better against some of the stronger opponents but not enough to assume anything more than luck. Possibly the gains were more situational and/or self-play specific than I expected this time.
I tend not to look much at the 60s+0.6s list. Its too much about beating up the lower end of the field
The higher TC + CPU counts are the real meat of the rating lists. Its what I'm refreshing for.
Re: FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:58 am
by Terje
AndrewGrant wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:28 am
jonkr wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:19 am
Thanks for testing. I was hoping for +15 but at least it wasn't negative =). I noticed it did better against some of the stronger opponents but not enough to assume anything more than luck. Possibly the gains were more situational and/or self-play specific than I expected this time.
I tend not to look much at the 60s+0.6s list. Its too much about beating up the lower end of the field
The higher TC + CPU counts are the real meat of the rating lists. Its what I'm refreshing for.
Weiss 1.1 would be happy to be in any list
hinthint 