Page 1 of 1

FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese 2.2

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:27 pm
by fastgm
FGRL rating list - 60 sec + 0.6 sec

Stockfish 12 (+66 to Stockfish 11)
SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3 (+4 to SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.2)
Lc0 0.26.1 721990 (+243 to Lc0 CPU 11258-112x9-se)
Cheese 2.2 (+50 to Cheese 2.1)

http://www.fastgm.de

Re: FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:19 am
by jonkr
Thanks for testing. I was hoping for +15 but at least it wasn't negative =). I noticed it did better against some of the stronger opponents but not enough to assume anything more than luck. Possibly the gains were more situational and/or self-play specific than I expected this time.

Re: FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:28 am
by AndrewGrant
jonkr wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:19 am
Thanks for testing. I was hoping for +15 but at least it wasn't negative =). I noticed it did better against some of the stronger opponents but not enough to assume anything more than luck. Possibly the gains were more situational and/or self-play specific than I expected this time.
I tend not to look much at the 60s+0.6s list. Its too much about beating up the lower end of the field :)

The higher TC + CPU counts are the real meat of the rating lists. Its what I'm refreshing for.

Re: FGRL rating list, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 1. Stockfish 12, 8. SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.3, 56. Lc0 0.26.1 721990, Cheese

Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:58 am
by Terje
AndrewGrant wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:28 am
jonkr wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:19 am
Thanks for testing. I was hoping for +15 but at least it wasn't negative =). I noticed it did better against some of the stronger opponents but not enough to assume anything more than luck. Possibly the gains were more situational and/or self-play specific than I expected this time.
I tend not to look much at the 60s+0.6s list. Its too much about beating up the lower end of the field :)

The higher TC + CPU counts are the real meat of the rating lists. Its what I'm refreshing for.
Weiss 1.1 would be happy to be in any list hinthint :D