SPCC: Testrun of Minic 2.51 nascent nutrient finished

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, bob, hgm

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
pohl4711
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

SPCC: Testrun of Minic 2.51 nascent nutrient finished

Post by pohl4711 » Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:28 am

AB-testrun of Minic 2.51 Nascent_Nutrient nnue-net (own net, created by Minic itself) finished.

https://www.sp-cc.de

(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache or reload the website)

User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: France

Re: SPCC: Testrun of Minic 2.51 nascent nutrient finished

Post by xr_a_y » Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:33 pm

Thanks a lot testing !

If is it possible for you, can you please rename the corresponding line in your table to
MinicNNUE 2.51 nasc_nutr

Did you use "ForceNNUE=false" (that means hybrid eval) on this test ?

pohl4711
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Re: SPCC: Testrun of Minic 2.51 nascent nutrient finished

Post by pohl4711 » Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:15 pm

xr_a_y wrote:
Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:33 pm
Thanks a lot testing !

If is it possible for you, can you please rename the corresponding line in your table to
MinicNNUE 2.51 nasc_nutr

Did you use "ForceNNUE=false" (that means hybrid eval) on this test ?
I tested with default settings. Only the net was specified with the NNUEFile option. Plus setting of hash and threads=1.

Renaming? The names of engine plus name of nnue-net is already pretty long. So, I would prefer to keep the name as it is. Because, when a nnue-net name is part of the engine-name, I believe it is totally clear, that the engine is a nnue-using engine?!?
And a renaming would mean, I must rename Nemorion and Igel, too. I think, all members of the computerchess-community know, which engine use nnue-nets. And nnue-nets are just a new kind of evaluation-function. Nobody had the idea, to rename the first engines, which were using Lmr-pruning or Nullmove etc... (Rybka LMR? or Fritz Nullmove? No.)

User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: France

Re: SPCC: Testrun of Minic 2.51 nascent nutrient finished

Post by xr_a_y » Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:41 pm

pohl4711 wrote:
Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:15 pm
xr_a_y wrote:
Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:33 pm
Thanks a lot testing !

If is it possible for you, can you please rename the corresponding line in your table to
MinicNNUE 2.51 nasc_nutr

Did you use "ForceNNUE=false" (that means hybrid eval) on this test ?
I tested with default settings. Only the net was specified with the NNUEFile option. Plus setting of hash and threads=1.

Renaming? The names of engine plus name of nnue-net is already pretty long. So, I would prefer to keep the name as it is. Because, when a nnue-net name is part of the engine-name, I believe it is totally clear, that the engine is a nnue-using engine?!?
And a renaming would mean, I must rename Nemorion and Igel, too. I think, all members of the computerchess-community know, which engine use nnue-nets. And nnue-nets are just a new kind of evaluation-function. Nobody had the idea, to rename the first engines, which were using Lmr-pruning or Nullmove etc... (Rybka LMR? or Fritz Nullmove? No.)
I understand your position and the comparison to LMR.
As I'm quite new to chess engine community in a way, this is the first "revolution" i'm living.
I need time and probably to take a step back.

Thanks again for your interest.

Post Reply