Page 1 of 1

My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:24 pm
by Sylwy
Test conditions:
-TC=4'+2"
-Hash=256 MB
-GUI: Fritz 17 x64
-Books: Fritz17.ctg for both engines
-default settings for both engines
-1 thread-CPU=Intel i5-7400-3GHz (Kaby Lake)
-OS: Windows 10 Home
-TBS: 6-men Syzygy bases linked to Fritz17 GUI.

Image

Deep Sjeng c't 2010 has 2926 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).
Expected rating for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake is around 3004 Elo points (CCRL Blitz). +145 Elo points face to Seer 1.1_x64_skylake.
Seer 1.1 x64 has 2859 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).

Congratulations !

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:46 pm
by connor_mcmonigle
That's fantastic news. It would seem I succeeded in finally surpassing Deep Sjeng. Some other testers are reporting somewhat higher elo for 1.2.1 so it's possible Deep Sjeng might just be a tough nut to crack for Seer :D . As always, thanks for testing! The next release will hopefully be substantially faster.

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:08 pm
by Sylwy
connor_mcmonigle wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:46 pm 1.- It would seem I succeeded in finally surpassing Deep Sjeng.
2.-it's possible Deep Sjeng might just be a tough nut to crack for Seer :D .
1.-YES ! Congratulations, again !
2.-Deep Sjeng c't 2010 is my favourite engine on 32-bit. Very balanced.

Next week I'll post here my test (in the same conditions) for the buggy Seer 1.2 version. I don't know why..... but seems stronger.

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:03 pm
by connor_mcmonigle
Sylwy wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:08 pm
connor_mcmonigle wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:46 pm 1.- It would seem I succeeded in finally surpassing Deep Sjeng.
2.-it's possible Deep Sjeng might just be a tough nut to crack for Seer :D .
1.-YES ! Congratulations, again !
2.-Deep Sjeng c't 2010 is my favourite engine on 32-bit. Very balanced.

Next week I'll post here my test (in the same conditions) for the buggy Seer 1.2 version. I don't know why..... but seems stronger.
Hmm. I would blame it on small sample size :D If you add the results from this match to your 1.2 match, you'll probably end up with even better estimate of 1.2.1's strength as the only change with 1.2.1 is the ability to find the shortest path to mate. The circumstances under which 1.2 wouldn't mate the opponent were rare anyways. In testing, the improvement gained only ~5 elo over thousands of games.

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:13 pm
by gerhard
Hallo Connor

have included our engine in tournament with a lot of opponents
results will come next week

http://computer-chess.org/doku.php?id=c ... ments:face

Best Gerhard

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 9:55 pm
by connor_mcmonigle
gerhard wrote: Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:13 pm Hallo Connor

have included our engine in tournament with a lot of opponents
results will come next week

http://computer-chess.org/doku.php?id=c ... ments:face

Best Gerhard
Thanks!

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:34 pm
by Sylwy
Here is my test for Seer 1.2 x64-skylake chess engine. The same test conditions like for Seer 1.2.1 x64-skylake.

Image

Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake

Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:04 am
by connor_mcmonigle
Sylwy wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:34 pm Here is my test for Seer 1.2 x64-skylake chess engine. The same test conditions like for Seer 1.2.1 x64-skylake.

Image
Looks consistent with your results for Seer 1.2.1 which is good to see. Thanks for testing.