7-men Syzygy attempt

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2089
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Nordlandia » Mon Nov 26, 2018 7:23 pm

7-men vs 5-men is not mentioned here.

Any plausible elo edge?

Someone in tcec chat guestimated 7-men yields about 18 elo advantage over 5-men.

Would be nice if he can do some brief testing though.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... &range=A33

Dann Corbit
Posts: 9068
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA
Contact:

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Dann Corbit » Mon Nov 26, 2018 7:39 pm

Nordlandia wrote:
Mon Nov 26, 2018 7:23 pm
7-men vs 5-men is not mentioned here.

Any plausible elo edge?

Someone in tcec chat guestimated 7-men yields about 18 elo advantage over 5-men.

Would be nice if he can do some brief testing though.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... &range=A33
I think that the man count is not enough to study the question.
What is the speed of the disk subsystem and type of access?

Imagine, for instance, striped raid with gumstick SSDs. Imagine further that access is over the bus and not over the network. Imagine further a TB of RAM for TB cache.

Consider another system with JBOD and a 10MHz network link. And the machine using them has 4 cores and 4GB RAM. And the JBOD disk attachment does not have a RAM cache of any kind.

The value of the TB files is going to be a function of many variables. So a test to determine the strength added will really be a test of the configuration as well.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.

User avatar
jshriver
Posts: 1105
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA
Contact:

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by jshriver » Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:11 pm

yurikvelo wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:33 am
Is uTorrent/BitTortent compatible with this file set?
I would love to make a torrent and add to my http://oics.olympuschess.com/tracker site. However I do not have the storage available to even host a local copy as of yet.

duncan
Posts: 8156
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by duncan » Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:54 pm

Dann Corbit wrote:
Mon Nov 26, 2018 7:39 pm
Nordlandia wrote:
Mon Nov 26, 2018 7:23 pm
7-men vs 5-men is not mentioned here.

Any plausible elo edge?

Someone in tcec chat guestimated 7-men yields about 18 elo advantage over 5-men.

Would be nice if he can do some brief testing though.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... &range=A33
I think that the man count is not enough to study the question.
What is the speed of the disk subsystem and type of access?

Imagine, for instance, striped raid with gumstick SSDs. Imagine further that access is over the bus and not over the network. Imagine further a TB of RAM for TB cache.

Consider another system with JBOD and a 10MHz network link. And the machine using them has 4 cores and 4GB RAM. And the JBOD disk attachment does not have a RAM cache of any kind.

The value of the TB files is going to be a function of many variables. So a test to determine the strength added will really be a test of the configuration as well.
Does anybody know what the elo gains are in the best configuration tested so far?

User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2089
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Nordlandia » Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:03 am

Is it waste to purchase 10 TB HDD for storing WDL for simple adjudication with cutechess?

The idea is that engines probe 5-men during search + automatic 7-piece adjudication once 7 pieces remains on the board.

It will speed up endgames somewhat compared to 6-piece adjudication. But is worth the investment for just passive adjudication?

User avatar
Ozymandias
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:30 am

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Ozymandias » Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:04 am

Nordlandia wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:03 am
Is it waste to purchase 10 TB HDD for storing WDL for simple adjudication with cutechess?

The idea is that engines probe 5-men during search + automatic 7-piece adjudication once 7 pieces remains on the board.

It will speed up endgames somewhat compared to 6-piece adjudication. But is worth the investment for just passive adjudication?
Does cutechess even support 7-piece adjudication?
Also, weren't the DTZ the files you wanted for adjudication?

User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2089
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Nordlandia » Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:51 am

Ozymandias wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:04 am
Nordlandia wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:03 am
Is it waste to purchase 10 TB HDD for storing WDL for simple adjudication with cutechess?

The idea is that engines probe 5-men during search + automatic 7-piece adjudication once 7 pieces remains on the board.

It will speed up endgames somewhat compared to 6-piece adjudication. But is worth the investment for just passive adjudication?
Does cutechess even support 7-piece adjudication?
Also, weren't the DTZ the files you wanted for adjudication?
Cutechess support 7-piece adjudication. Wdl is needed.

User avatar
yurikvelo
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:53 pm

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by yurikvelo » Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:25 am

Nordlandia wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:03 am
Is it waste to purchase 10 TB HDD for storing WDL for simple adjudication with cutechess?

The idea is that engines probe 5-men during search + automatic 7-piece adjudication once 7 pieces remains on the board.

It will speed up endgames somewhat compared to 6-piece adjudication. But is worth the investment for just passive adjudication?
Syzygy author explains that WDL is not working correctly without WDZ. Compression scheme require all files (including 3-4-5-6-men)
I would love to make a torrent and add to my http://oics.olympuschess.com/tracker site. However I do not have the storage available to even host a local copy as of yet.
full Nalimov-6 set couldn't be converted to *.torrent, because of limit, so it was split in parts and uploaded to rutracker.org

User avatar
Ozymandias
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:30 am

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Ozymandias » Thu Nov 29, 2018 5:46 am

Nordlandia wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:51 am
Cutechess support 7-piece adjudication. Wdl is needed.
When did they upgrade cutechess? The last syzygy commit I could find dates back two years.

Is WDL all you need? In other words, can you do without DTZ, if you don't play past 7 pieces (ie. you adjudicate)? That would be a huge save in terms of HDD space... and money.

User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2089
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt

Post by Nordlandia » Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:53 am

Ozymandias wrote:
Thu Nov 29, 2018 5:46 am
Nordlandia wrote:
Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:51 am
Cutechess support 7-piece adjudication. Wdl is needed.
When did they upgrade cutechess? The last syzygy commit I could find dates back two years.

Is WDL all you need? In other words, can you do without DTZ, if you don't play past 7 pieces (ie. you adjudicate)? That would be a huge save in terms of HDD space... and money.
You mean HDD space... money and time ;)

10 TB HDDs is available at 300-350 dollars at the time being. Wdl ~ 10 TB.

Post Reply