Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon
Contact:

Re: Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Post by Guenther » Tue May 14, 2019 9:43 am

xr_a_y wrote:
Tue May 14, 2019 9:31 am
I checked some of the game, there are not that bad.
It would be sufficient to have depth lowered by some factor...
(cpu load due to too much concurrent games and other possibilities)

example vs. Minic
10. Bf4? discarded at depth 8 , 13.Bf2?? discarded at depth 7, both in less than 0.5 sec
(and Jonny is exremely fast in nps and reaches quite high depths normally despite being from 2010)


User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: France

Re: Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Post by xr_a_y » Tue May 14, 2019 9:56 am

Yes clearly something wrong but not like win on time or crash.

User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon
Contact:

Re: Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Post by Guenther » Tue May 14, 2019 10:12 am

xr_a_y wrote:
Tue May 14, 2019 9:56 am
Yes clearly something wrong but not like win on time or crash.
Of course wins on time or crashes would be checked for a reason.

More subtile errors could go unchecked (for a while), although one would expect
a check, if an established program suddenly loses 10 or 20 or more games
in a row vs. an equal opponent.
Moreover I would always run the full pgn (which we don't have now) against a depth stats program.
(e.g. search for the 'Devel' incident
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=65572&p=736948&hili ... em#p736948)

User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: France

Re: Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Post by xr_a_y » Tue May 14, 2019 11:37 am

I wasn't aware, and now even more thankful, that the testing process was so professional.
Thanks again to all testers.

User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 2780
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon
Contact:

Re: Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Post by Guenther » Tue May 14, 2019 11:52 am

xr_a_y wrote:
Tue May 14, 2019 11:37 am
I wasn't aware, and now even more thankful, that the testing process was so professional.
Thanks again to all testers.
Well, I am no CCRL tester, I only described what I would do, if it was my test ;-)

Sergio Martinez
Posts: 1598
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:35 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Re: Weird results Tunguska 1.1 vs Jonny 4.0

Post by Sergio Martinez » Sat May 18, 2019 9:37 pm

Certainly there are something bad here. I cant check now (out of home) but i will investigate it the monday.

I have seen these last games of Jonny were played in my Dual Xeon 5675. I leave some cores free there (Xeon has 12cores and I use 8-9 at same time max) so it cant be the reason.

I use Arena Gui (3.51), at the moment I dont know the reason why Jonny plays this way but i will try to repeat the games and I will tell you.

Thank you guys.
Member of the CCRL Group. Write me if you want I test your engine.

Post Reply