Thanks for your help. Is this the exe I should use, rather than the previous one you posted.jhaglund2 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 7:44 pm Update: It compiles the same, without TB.
Crafty 25.3 - VS 2019 source http://www.filedropper.com/crafty-253-vs2019
Crafty 25.3 - 64 CPU
crafty.zip
Doesn't really matter. A better one will be done soon.Thanks for your help. Is this the exe I should use, rather than the previous one you posted.
I took a look at tbprobe.c, and that looks fine, so I downloaded some of those include files that didn't come with VS2019, and put them in my library folder. https://github.com/zenny-chen/simple-st ... r-VS-Clangbob wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:08 am OK, a few notes.
(1) the stdatomic.h error requires the definition of _cplusplus which I assume is a windows thing. Note that this changed since I went to the new syzygy support code that Ronald pointed me to. If that is defined, then it includes atomic.h which I assume (again) is a windows thing... This means that using a c++ compile will likely work for that file (tbprobe.c I think). Or you can find out what the standard C compiler defines as an identifying string and replace the cplussplus with that string.
Code: Select all
#ifdef __cplusplus
#include <atomic>
#else
#include <stdatomic.h>
#endif
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef uint8_t bool; //illegal
#include "tbprobe.h"
#ifdef __cplusplus
using namespace std;
#endifCode: Select all
typedef uint8_t; bool; // correct?This sounds good. The real problem was the transition from 25.0.1 to 25.2, replacing the EGTB.(2) many of the other errors seem to be around the RESTRICT password which was something Eugene Nalimov added to Crafty years ago. For all of the other errors (option.c, book.c and such) they were not changed from 25.2 to 25.3, so something changed in windows C compiler (big surprise there). If someone is interested in pursuing these, let me know. I have cleaned up the formats issues, and removed all the RESTRICTs everywhere. Still compiles clean on my gcc box and using clang on my MacBook... If you are interested, I can zip and email you the complete source and we can try a few compile cycles to see if these can be cleaned up for windows. (this is one reason I despise microsoft).
Also a good plan.BTW I believe those errors in option.c spin around using size_t and uint64_t in different places. Think I have fixed that as this really is a 64 bit only program anyway so size_t is not really needed and seems to aggravate MSVC as being different from uint64_t (which are both supposed to resolve to the same thing size-wise.)
Code: Select all
typedef bool uint8_t; //corrected;Only in C++-17, as std::bool. As I mentioned earlier, tbprobe.c is intended to be compiled either as C99 or C++. Either should work, although I have not tested C++17. I have compiled it with MSVC 2019 (C++) and it worked.