Re: Tapered Evaluation and MSE (Texel Tuning)
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:17 pm
Here is the phase distribution of the file ccrl-40-15-elo-3200.epd, computed with the formula above.
Phase 20,22,24 are about 45%. As pointed out already the error for mg positions should be larger
than the eg error, of course i can it measure too. For me it is still clear that the tuner wants to eleminate the mg-error
as much as possible.
Now, i will force a file that includes balanced phases and look into the results...
Code: Select all
Phase 0: [7252] 0.005
Phase 1: [5564] 0.004
Phase 2: [66899] 0.044
Phase 3: [20326] 0.013
Phase 4: [100173] 0.065
Phase 5: [30753] 0.020
Phase 6: [116946] 0.076
Phase 7: [30194] 0.020
Phase 8: [86460] 0.056
Phase 9: [21681] 0.014
Phase 10: [87846] 0.057
Phase 11: [19751] 0.013
Phase 12: [70576] 0.046
Phase 13: [14432] 0.009
Phase 14: [72276] 0.047
Phase 15: [15655] 0.010
Phase 16: [59808] 0.039
Phase 17: [19346] 0.013
Phase 18: [98192] 0.064
Phase 19: [16546] 0.011
Phase 20: [142588] 0.093
Phase 21: [15115] 0.010
Phase 22: [168848] 0.110
Phase 23: [13979] 0.009
Phase 24: [236174] 0.154
More than 5%...
Phase 4: [100173] 0.065
Phase 6: [116946] 0.076
Phase 8: [86460] 0.056
Phase 10: [87846] 0.057
Phase 18: [98192] 0.064
Phase 20: [142588] 0.093
Phase 22: [168848] 0.110
Phase 24: [236174] 0.154
than the eg error, of course i can it measure too. For me it is still clear that the tuner wants to eleminate the mg-error
as much as possible.
Now, i will force a file that includes balanced phases and look into the results...