The brilliant chess move (61)

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Glarean
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Switzerland
Full name: Walter Eigenmann

The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by Glarean »

.

There's a new "Brilliant" in 'Glarean Magazin':

The Brilliant Chess Move #61 (Endgame):
http://glareanverlag.wordpress.com/2010 ... achzug-61/
Regards: Walter

White to move
Image

Solution: http://glareanverlag.wordpress.com/2010 ... achzug-61/
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by zullil »

[D]1k6/bPN2pp1/Pp2p3/p1p5/2pn4/3P4/PPR5/1K6 w - -
LiquidNitrogenOverclocker

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by LiquidNitrogenOverclocker »

What program drew that awesome looking 3D board?
Glarean
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Switzerland
Full name: Walter Eigenmann

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by Glarean »

LiquidNitrogenOverclocker wrote:What program drew that awesome looking 3D board?
Fritz

http://www.cblivestreams.de/Pitters1

Regards: Walter

.
muxecoid
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:54 am
Location: Israel

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by muxecoid »

Stockfish gives Rf2 score of +2.1 and does not need Na8!! Who needs Na8 when you can play Rf2, huh?

Out of curiosity I tried to run Stockfish with multiPV=20 (deeply analyze all moves). Na8 had -2.2 score most of the time. At depth 19 Ra8 got score of -0.5 but at depth 20 it fell to -2.2.

I thought that a lone king can not hold 3 pawns at once, I was wrong. :)
Jim Walker
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:31 am

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by Jim Walker »

I too learned a lesson from this position. :idea:
Glarean
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Switzerland
Full name: Walter Eigenmann

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by Glarean »

muxecoid wrote:Stockfish gives Rf2 score of +2.1 and does not need Na8!! Who needs Na8 when you can play Rf2, huh?
Everyone needs Na8, if Na8 is much better than Rf2...

Regards: Walter
BBauer
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:58 pm

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by BBauer »

Great position, if it is correct.
My little analysis:
1.Na8 Nxc2
2.Kxc2 f5
3.dxc4 a4
The move 3. ...a4 is not in your analysis.
Now stockfish gives a score of zero at depth 32.

Do you have an idea how to win after 3. ...a4 ?
Kind regards
your patzer Bernhard
Glarean
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Switzerland
Full name: Walter Eigenmann

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by Glarean »

BBauer wrote:Great position, if it is correct.
My little analysis:
1.Na8 Nxc2
2.Kxc2 f5
3.dxc4 a4
The move 3. ...a4 is not in your analysis.
Now stockfish gives a score of zero at depth 32.

Do you have an idea how to win after 3. ...a4 ?
Of course:
1.Na8 Nxc2
2.Kxc2 f5
3.dxc4 a4
4.a3 Game over 1:0
White wins against 3 Pawns
(Zugzwang: Bad Bishop)

Regards: Walter

.
jdart
Posts: 4366
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: The brilliant chess move (61)

Post by jdart »

Can you post the source game?