"Promotion" of engines in CCC.

[Matthias Gemuh]

So the site sponsor does not want any engines "promoted" in CCC that Graham hates, right ?

If that persists, my days as CCC member are counted.

Matthias.

[Edward German]

So the site sponsor does not want any engines "promoted" in CCC that Graham hates, right ?

If that persists, my days as CCC member are counted.

Matthias.

I do not hope that this is so!

My days would be counted here!

Better then I open a separate board
and then write about chess that I want,
and of course with interesting analyses, etc.

(German: So wie man es von mir kennt!)

I am since 2000 a CCC member.

ED.

[karger]

I agree with Matthias completely concerning Graham and his opinions. John Karger

[Wayne Lowrance]

Good for Mr Banks, I support him.
Wayne

[Albert Silver]

Good for Mr Banks, I support him.
Wayne

It has nothing to do with Graham, so I'm not sure what the deal is.

[K I Hyams]

So the site sponsor does not want any engines "promoted" in CCC that Graham hates, right ?

If that persists, my days as CCC member are counted.

Matthias.

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 97&t=34801
Mr Banks seems to me to act as a promoter/have implicit faith in at least 3 “deities”.

[Matthias Gemuh]

So the site sponsor does not want any engines "promoted" in CCC that Graham hates, right ?

If that persists, my days as CCC member are counted.

Matthias.

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 97&t=34801
Mr Banks seems to me to act as a promoter/mouthpiece for at least 3 “deities”........................

2 of those 3 “deities” certainly did not contact the site sponsor to seek for the censorship.

Matthias.

[Nimzovik]

I personally fail to see the problem. The issue of ethics is of considerable importance here - namely the theft of intellectual property -hotly debated to be sure- and a person'(s) lively hood. There is a discussion of the clone engines in other area's of this forum which seems a reasonable solution to me.... Perhaps I am not understanding the problem?

[Albert Silver]

So the site sponsor does not want any engines "promoted" in CCC that Graham hates, right ?

If that persists, my days as CCC member are counted.

Matthias.

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 97&t=34801
Mr Banks seems to me to act as a promoter/mouthpiece for at least 3 “deities”........................

2 of those 3 “deities” certainly did not contact the site sponsor to seek for the censorship.

Matthias.

True. It was probably the companies the site sponsor works with.

[K I Hyams]

So the site sponsor does not want any engines "promoted" in CCC that Graham hates, right ?

If that persists, my days as CCC member are counted.

Matthias.

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 97&t=34801
Mr Banks seems to me to act as a promoter/mouthpiece for at least 3 “deities”........................

2 of those 3 “deities” certainly did not contact the site sponsor to seek for the censorship.

Matthias.

I assumed that to be the case. You have incorrectly identified the "deities" to whom I was referring. I am fully aware of the views of the other two CCC moderators and neither of them was included in the list.