Point is that if you say this it hasnt the same power as if it had been written in the verdict of a court case. So who cares what you are saying? You are no judge. Overall we must see that if something isnt ruled out in court there is no different way to make a private, sort of lynch verdict. Therefore I say, if you show no interest in a court case then there cant be something illegal of any sorts. There rest is campaigns to slowly defamate someone's name. I didnt know that this is the CC method of choice.bob wrote: And when A copies B but explicitly denies anything was copied... the term "poor ethical behaviour" is the first thing that comes to mind.
Therefore I repeat my call for a new acceptance of reality without private justice.