Let analyse this criminal approach. Assumed that it's correct against Vas in relation to Fruit, what I dont support or accept, for me it counts what Vas said about it, namely NOT what our Bob wants to insinuate! - then there is still a huge difference in the two cases.Milos wrote:However, it perfectly applies to Ippo/Rybka issue.bob wrote:Don't see where that applies here. It is not so "fundamentally transformed that it becomes a new work" when you can find duplicate blocks of code...
Ippo is exactly fundamentally transformed that it becomes a new work and Vas as the holder of the copyright of the work—from which such a “transformative derivative work” is derived—has absolutely no rights over it and of course he knows it. This perfectly explains his behavior.
Vas didnt harm Fabien in any thinkable respect. More, Fabien didnt even think of sueing Vas, he didnt care at all, despite the GPL blabla from Bob and comrades.
But these anon jerks of Hipa, they are criminals and this would be clear as soon as they would appear under a real name and legally relevant address. Talking about the Law in Europe. Not China or Russia. A third condition is that the income must be a bit higher than social transfer donations and welfare. So, the real source is pretty feasable. These anons are either kids, underaged as proxies, poor workless programmers or weak immigrants who are outcasts and therefore enjoy the freedom on the internet without having to fear social discrimination because they are already discriminate enough (NB I dont applaud their fate) -, so, yes this explains why a man of real and rational mind isnt wasting his time with such deranged people or bystanders who are trying to nag Vas with irrelevant questions and comments.
So basically, the question exists why people like you want to express a certain satisfaction about the mess the anon jerks had put Vas into. Whast is your personal motif? What has Vas done against you so that you appear in public like a supporter of criminals?
Just curious. But now you will dive away, correct?
Look, I am so honest that I declare, that if here or elsewhere something could be proven against Vas then I would convert but not due to a dirty campaign incl. character defamation.